Aptitude measures in SLA

References

1. Bamford, K. W. , & Mizokawa, D. T.
   (1991) Additive-bilingual (immersion) education: Cognitive and language development. Language Learning, 41, 413–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1991.tb00612.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00612.x [Google Scholar]
2. Carroll, J. B.
   (1962) The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training research and education (pp.87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carroll, J. B.
   (1965) The contributions of psychological theory and educational research to the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 49(5), 273–281.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carroll, J.
   (1973) Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics2, 5–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carroll, J.
   (1979) Psychometric approaches to the study of language abilities. In C. J. Fillmore , D. Kempler , & W. -S. Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp.13–32). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑255950‑1.50008‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50008-1 [Google Scholar]
6. Carroll, J.
   (1981) Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp.83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carroll, J.
   (1991) Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp.11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carroll, J. , & Sapon, S.
   (1959) Modern language aptitude test. New York, NY: The Psychology Corporation.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carroll, J. , & Sapon, S.
   (1967) Modern language aptitude test – Elementary. New York, NY: The Psychology Corporation.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Collentine, J. , & Freed, B.
    (Eds.) (2004) Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Special Issue ofStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–356.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cooper, T. C.
    (1987) Foreign language study and SAT-verbal scores. Modern Language Journal, 71(4): 381–387 doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1987.tb00376.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1987.tb00376.x [Google Scholar]
12. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
    Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (2013) Defense language proficiency test 5 system: Familiarization guide for multiple-choice format. Retrieved from www.dliflc.edu/archive/documents/.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DeKeyser, R.
    (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dörnyei, Z. , & Skehan, P.
    (2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.589–630). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 [Google Scholar]
16. Doughty, C. J. , Campbell, S. G. , Bunting, M. F. , Bowles, A. , & Haarmann, H.
    (2007) The development of the High-Level Language Aptitude Battery. Technical Report: Center for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College Park.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Educational Testing Service
    Educational Testing Service (2013) Test fairness and validity. Retrieved from www.ets.org/gre/institutions/about/fairness/
    [Google Scholar]
18. Freed, B. , Segalowitz, N. , & Dewey, D.
    (2004) Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104262064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262064 [Google Scholar]
19. Humes-Bartlo, M.
    (1989) Variation in children’s ability to learn second languages. In K. Hyltenstam , & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp.41–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611780.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611780.004 [Google Scholar]
20. Interagency Language Roundtable
    Interagency Language Roundtable (1985) Interagency language roundtable skill level descriptions. Retrieved from www.govtilr.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Keesling, J. W.
    (1997) Language skill change project, relook: Final report (DLIFLC Technical Report No. 97–03). Monterey, CA: Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lett, J. A. , & O’Mara, F. E.
    (1990) Predictors of success in an intensive foreign language learning context: Correlates of language learning at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp.222–260). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Li, S.
    (2016) The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–842. doi: 10.1017/S027226311500042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042X [Google Scholar]
24. Linck, J. , Highes, M. , Campbell, S. , Silbert, N. , Tare, M. , Jackson, S. , Smith, B. , Wall, D. , Meyers, J. , Bunting, M. , & Doughty, C.
    (2012) Hi-LAB identifies successful high-proficiency language learners: results of the group discrimination study. Technical Report: Center for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College Park.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Linck, J. , Hughes, M. , Campbell, S. , Silbert, N. , Tare, M. , Jackson, S. , Smith, B. , Bunting, M. , & Doughty, C.
    (2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. doi: 10.1111/lang.12011
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011 [Google Scholar]
26. Lohman, D. F.
    (2004) Aptitude for College. In R. Zwick (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Miyake, A. , & Friedman, D.
    (1998) Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp.339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
28. O’Brien, I. , Segalowitz, N. , Freed, B. , & Collentine, J.
    (2007) Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(4), 557–581.
    [Google Scholar]
29. O’Mara, F. E. , Lett, J. A. , & Alexander, E. E.
    (1994) Language skill change project: Description and methods. (LSCP RI). Monterey, CA: Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Petersen, C. , & Al-Haik, A.
    (1976) The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 369–380.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pimsleur, P.
    (1996) Testing foreign language learning. In Valdman, A. (Ed.), Trends in language teaching (pp.175–214). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pimsleur, P.
    (1968) Language aptitude testing. In Davies, A. (Ed.), Language aptitude symposium: A linguistic approach (pp.98–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Robinson, P.
    (2013) Aptitude in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–5). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sawyer, M. , & Ranta, L.
    (2001) Aptitude, individual differences and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.219–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.013 [Google Scholar]
35. Schneiderman, E. I. , & Desmarais, C.
    (1988) The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research4(2), 91–109. doi: 10.1177/026765838800400201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765838800400201 [Google Scholar]
36. Schoonen, R. , Hulstijn, J. , & Bossers, B.
    (1998) Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension. An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71–106. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00033
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00033 [Google Scholar]
37. Segalowitz, N. , & Freed, B.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104262027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
38. Silva, J. M. , & White, L. A.
    (1993) Relation of cognitive aptitudes to success in foreign language training. Military Psychology, 5, 79–93. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp0502_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0502_1 [Google Scholar]
39. Skehan, P.
    (1986) Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp.81–94). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Skehan, P.
    (1991) Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275–98. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100009979
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009979 [Google Scholar]
41. Sparks, R. , & Ganschow, L.
    (1991) Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?Modern Language Journal, 75, 3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1991.tb01076.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01076.x [Google Scholar]
42. Sparks, R. , & Ganschow, L.
    (1993) Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking native and foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 77, 289–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1993.tb01974.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01974.x [Google Scholar]
43. Sparks, R. , & Ganschow, L.
    (1995) A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. Modern Language Journal79, 235–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1995.tb05436.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05436.x [Google Scholar]
44. Sparks, R. , Artzer, M. , Ganschow, L. , Sibenhar, D. , Plageman, M. , & Patton, J.
    (1998) Differences in native-language skills, foreign-language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high-, average-, and low-proficiency foreign language learners: Two studies. Language Testing, 15(2), 181–216.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Surface, E. A. , Dierdorff, E. C. , & Donnelly, J.
    (2004) Modeling second language proficiency change for US special operations personnel. Paper presented atthe 19th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
46. VanPatten, B.
    (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vatz, K. , Tare, M. , Jackson, S. R. , & Doughty, C. J.
    (2013) Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In G. Granena , & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp.274–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.35.11vat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.11vat [Google Scholar]
48. Walter, C.
    (2000) The involvement of working memory in reading in a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]