Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Studies on the impact of learning context in second language (L2) acquisition seldom look at learners and their learning journey from the very beginning. Consequently, it is difficult to know for certain whether the findings of study-abroad vs. at-home research are applicable to this group of learners. The present study examines six learners’ L2 developmental processes of three Chinese word order structures in two settings: China and Australia. The analysis of two longitudinal corpora showed no impact of the learning setting on the acquisition sequence. The impact, however, was found in learning efficiency. Measured by the number of hours of formal instruction, the three learners in Australia progressed faster than the three learners in China although the latter had received much more classroom instruction and were in an immersive environment. The findings suggest that learning an L2 at home is not inferior for early L2 grammatical development.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Carroll, S.
    (1999) Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15(4), 337–388. 10.1191/026765899674928444
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899674928444 [Google Scholar]
  2. Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A.
    (2002) Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52, 401–438. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00188
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00188 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Y.-R.
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clahsen, H.
    (1984) The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to second language acquisition. InR. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages (pp.219–242). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collentine, J.
    (2004) The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227–248. 10.1017/S0272263104262040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262040 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2009) Study abroad research: findings, implications and future directions. InM. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp.218–233). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  7. Collentine, J., & Freed, B.
    (2004) Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–171. 10.1017/S0272263104262015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262015 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeKeyser, R.
    (1986) From learning to acquisition? Foreign language development in a US classroom and during a semester abroad (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
  9. (1991) Foreign language development during a semester abroad. InB. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp.104–119). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2007) Study abroad as foreign language practice. InR. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language. Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.208–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Biase, B.
    (2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. InJ. Kessler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.197–220). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
    (1997) On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P.
    (2004) Context of learning and second language fluency in French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301. 10.1017/S0272263104262064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262064 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gao, X.
    (2005) Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Victoria University of Wellington.
  17. Gregg, K.
    (2006) Taking a social turn for the worse: The language socialization paradigm for second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 22(4), 413–442. 10.1191/0267658306sr274oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr274oa [Google Scholar]
  18. Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P.
    (2010) Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60(2), 5–24. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00598.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00598.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Håkansson, G., & Norrby, G. H. C.
    (2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60(3), 628–650. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00569.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00569.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
    (2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics30(4), 461–473. 10.1093/applin/amp048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  21. Housen, A., Schoonjans, E., Janssens, S., Welcomme, A., Schoonheere, E., & Pierrard, E.
    (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring the impact of contextual factors in instructed SLA – The role of language prominence. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49(2), 83–112. 10.1515/iral.2011.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Isabelli, C.
    (2000) Motivation and extended interaction in the study abroad context: Factors in the development of Spanish language accuracy and communication skills (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.
  23. Jiang, W.
    (2013) A Look at the word order in spoken Mandarin: A quantitative study (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Canberra.
  24. Krashen, S.
    (1980) The input hypothesis. InJ. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp.168–180). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lantolf, J. P.
    (2000) Sociocultural theory and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, C., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, B.
    (2016) A processing approach to the L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University, Canberra.
  30. Liu, X.
    (1981) 《实用汉语课本》第一册,第二册(第一版)北京:商务出版社。[Practical Chinese reader. Book 1 & Book 2 (1st ed.)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  31. (2015) 《新实用汉语课本》(第三版)北京:北京语言大学出版社。[New practical Chinese reader (3rd ed.)]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.
  32. Long, M.
    (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1997) Construct validity in SLA: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318–323. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05487.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05487.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L.
    (2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 81–99. 10.1075/aral.28.1.06man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.28.1.06man [Google Scholar]
  35. Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
    (1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135. 10.1017/S0272263100004137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004137 [Google Scholar]
  36. Milton, J., & Meara, P.
    (1995) How periods abroad affect vocabulary growth in a foreign language. ITL Review of Applied linguistics, 107–108, 17–34. 10.1075/itl.107‑108.02mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.107-108.02mil [Google Scholar]
  37. Möhle, D.
    (1984) A comparison of the second language speech of different native speakers. InH. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language production (pp.26–49). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pallotti, G.
    (2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361–382. 10.1093/applin/amm018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018 [Google Scholar]
  39. Perdue, C.
    (1996) Pre-basic varieties: The first stages of second language acquisition. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 2, 135–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pérez-Vidal, C., & Juan-Garau, M.
    (2011) The effect of context and input conditions on oral and written development: A study abroad perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49(2), 157–185. 10.1515/iral.2011.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.008 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pienemann, M.
    (1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214. 10.1017/S0272263100005015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005015 [Google Scholar]
  42. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses.Applied Linguistics, 1, 52–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
    (2005) Extending Processability Theory. InM. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.09pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.09pie [Google Scholar]
  46. Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
    (1999) A unified approach toward the development of Swedish as a L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 383–420. 10.1017/S0272263199003022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003022 [Google Scholar]
  47. Regan, V.
    (1995) The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. InB. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp.245–268). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.9.15reg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.9.15reg [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S.
    (1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. InR. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp.237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. 10.1017/S0272263104262027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
  50. Slobin, D. I.
    (1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sun, C.-F., & Givon, T.
    (1985) On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language61(2), 329–351. 10.2307/414148
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414148 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tarone, E.
    (2007) Sociolinguistic approaches to second language research 1997–2007. The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 837–848. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00672.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00672.x [Google Scholar]
  53. VanPatten, B.
    (1993) Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435–450. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1993.tb01179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb01179.x [Google Scholar]
  54. (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction. Chestnut Hill, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wen, X.
    (2006) Acquisition sequence of three constructions: An analysis of the Interlanguage of learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 41(3), 89–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ying, H.
    (1995) What sort of input is needed for intake?International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 175–194. 10.1515/iral.1995.33.3.175
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1995.33.3.175 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, Y.
    (2001) Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: a processability perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University, Canberra.
  58. (2005) Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. InM. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.155–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.30.07zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.30.07zha [Google Scholar]
  59. (2007) Testing the Topic Hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. InF. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2019) L2 acquisition of Chinese Object topicalization structures: Processability and information structure. InA. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues (pp.145–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, Y., & Liu, B.
    (2016) The ‘tense’ issue: Variable past tense marking by advanced end-state Chinese speakers of L2 English. InJ.-U. Kessler, A. Lenzing, & X. Liebner (Eds.), Developing, modelling and assessing second languages (pp.101–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/palart.5.05zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.5.05zha [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error