1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The field of study abroad (SA) research has paid scant attention to the perspectives of people with whom SA students interact in the host community (e.g., Kinginger, 2012), particularly to the perspectives of peers. This paper analyzes interviews conducted with eight English-speaking peers of Japanese SA students sojourning in Western Canada. Using membership categorization analysis (MCA) (Housley & Fitzgerald, 2015), it examines how peers used category-based rationales to claim or resist responsibilities related to the SA students’ language development. Findings point to the relevance of two local identity categories: friends and exchange students. Exchange students were constructed as responsible for ‘asking for help’ while peers constructed their own role as ‘helping when asked’. Peers also treated correction as an ‘unfriendly’ practice. In addition to providing insight into peers’ understandings of their roles in students’ learning, the analyses demonstrate how interview questions can shape the participants responses in meaningful ways.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sar.17018.sur
2019-02-28
2019-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S.
    (Eds.) (1998) Identities in talk. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anya, U.
    (2017) Racialized identities in second language learning: Speaking blackness in Brazil. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, C. D.
    (2004) Membership categorization and interview accounts. InD. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research. Theory, methods and practice. (2nd ed., pp.162–176). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, C. D., & Johnson, G.
    (1998) Interview talk as professional practice. Language and Education, 12(4), 229–242. 10.1080/09500789808666751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789808666751 [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P., & Brown, J.
    (2013) Second language identity in narratives of study abroad. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137029423
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029423 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E.
    (2006) Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Block, D.
    (2007) The rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). The Modern Language Journal, 91, 863–876. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00674.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00674.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
    (2008) All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 401–431. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00382.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00382.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gisladottir, R., Kendrick, K., Levinson, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2015) Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS ONE, 10(9). 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136100 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dings, A.
    (2014) Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 742–756. 10.1111/modl.12120
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12120 [Google Scholar]
  11. Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S.
    (2011) Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.95–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellwood, C.
    (2011) Undoing the knots: Identity transformations in a study abroad programme. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(9), 960–978. 10.1111/j.1469‑5812.2009.00559.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00559.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Evaldsson, A.-C.
    (2007) Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 377–404. 10.1080/08351810701471377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471377 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fukuda, C.
    (2014) Identities and linguistic varieties in Japanese: An analysis of language ideologies as participants’ accomplishments. Pragmatics, 24(1), 35–62. 10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.1.02fuk [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, M. H.
    (2006) The hidden life of girls. Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470773567
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773567 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, M. H., & Kyratzis, A.
    (2012) Peer language socialization. InA. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Handbook of language socialization (pp.365–390). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Greer, T., Brandt, A., & Ogawa, Y.
    (2013) Identity in intercultural interaction: How categories do things. The 2013 PanSIG Conference Proceedings (pp.155–164). JALT PanSIG.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, J.
    (2018) The ubiquity of epistemics : A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 14–56. 10.1177/1461445617734342
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734342 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hester, S., & Eglin, P.
    (Eds.) (1997) Culture in Action. Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hosoda, Y.
    (2006) Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25–50. 10.1093/applin/ami022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami022 [Google Scholar]
  21. Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R.
    (2015) Advances in membership categorisation analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Housley, W., & Smith, R. J.
    (2011) Mundane reason, membership categorization practices and the everyday ontology of space and place in interview talk. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 698–715. 10.1177/1468794111415960
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111415960 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishida, M.
    (2010) Development of interactional competence in L2 Japanese during study abroad: The use of modal expressions in recipient actions. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No.3415909).
  24. Jackson, J.
    (2008) Language, identity, and study abroad: Sociocultural perspectives. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jayyusi, L.
    (1984) Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenks, C.
    (2013) ‘Your pronunciation and your accent is very excellent’: Orientations of identity during compliment sequences in English as a lingua franca encounters. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 165–181. 10.1080/14708477.2013.770865
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.770865 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kinginger, C.
    (2009) Language learning and study abroad. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230240766
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240766 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2012) Langauge socialization in study abroad. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–7). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2013) Identity and language learning in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 339–358. 10.1111/flan.12037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12037 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kurhila, S.
    (2005) Different orientations to grammatical correctness. InK. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp.143–158). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230287853_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maheux-Pelletier, G., & Golato, A.
    (2008) Repair in membership categorization in French. Language in Society, 37, 689–712. 10.1017/S0047404508080998
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080998 [Google Scholar]
  32. Masuda, K.
    (2011) Acquiring interactional competence in a study abroad context: Japanese language learners’ use of the interactional particle ne. The Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 519–540. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01256.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01256.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Mori, J.
    (2012) Tale of two tales: Locally produced accounts and memberships during research interviews with a multilingual speaker. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 489–506. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01399.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01399.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Mossman, T.
    (2012) “They’re different from who I am:” Making relevant identities in the middle through talk-in-interaction. TESL Canada, 29(6), 103–123. 10.18806/tesl.v29i0.1112
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i0.1112 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ohara, Y., & Saft, S.
    (2003) Using conversation analysis to track gender ideologies in social interaction: Toward a feminist analysis of a Japanese phone-in consultation TV program. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 153–172. 10.1177/0957926503014002855
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002855 [Google Scholar]
  36. Park, J.-E.
    (2007) Co-construction of nonnative speaker identity in cross-cultural interaction. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 339–360. 10.1093/applin/amm001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pellegrino-Aveni, V.
    (2005) Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620584
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620584 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pomerantz, A., & Mandlebaum, J.
    (2005) Conversation analytic approach to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction. InK. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp.149–171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rawlins, W. K.
    (1992) Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. Hawthorne, NY: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. (Vols.1–2edited byG. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sharrock, W. W.
    (1974) On owning knowledge. InR. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected reading (pp.45–53). Middlesex: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shively, R. L.
    (2015) Developing interactional competence during study abroad: Listener responses in L2 Spanish. System, 48, 86–98. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2016) An activity theoretical approach to social interaction during study abroad. L2 Journal, 8(2), 51–75. 10.5070/L28228670
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L28228670 [Google Scholar]
  45. Steensig, J., & Drew, P.
    (2008) Introduction. Questioning and affiliation / disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 5–15. 10.1177/1461445607085581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607085581 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stokoe, E.
    (1998) Talking about gender: The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse. Discourse & Society, 9(2), 217–240. 10.1177/0957926598009002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009002005 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2012) Categorial systematics. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 345–354. 10.1177/1461445612441543
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441543 [Google Scholar]
  48. Talmy, S., & Richards, K.
    (2011) Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 1–5. 10.1093/applin/amq045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq045 [Google Scholar]
  49. Waring, H. Z.
    (2009) Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00526.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Watson, D. R.
    (1978) Categorization, authorization and blame: Negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113. 10.1177/003803857801200106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wernicke-Heinrichs, M.
    (2013) Authenticating “non-native speaker teacher” professional identity in French as a second language (FSL) education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
  52. Whitehead, K. A.
    (2009) “Categorizing the categorizer:” The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 325–342. 10.1177/019027250907200406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200406 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wilkinson, S.
    (1998) On the nature of immersion during study abroad: Some participant perspectives. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4, 121–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2011) Constructing ethnicity statistics in talk-in-interaction: Producing the “White European.” Discourse & Society, 22(3), 343–361. 10.1177/0957926510395446
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395446 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilkinson, S., & Hall, C.
    (2002) The omnipresent classroom during summer study abroad: American students in conversation with their French hosts. The Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 157–173. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00142
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00142 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wong, J.
    (2005) Sidestepping grammar. InK. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp.159–173). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230287853_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_10 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sar.17018.sur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sar.17018.sur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): correction , interviews , membership categorization analysis , morality , peer interaction and reflexivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error