1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study takes a Usage-Based approach to the learning of French multiword expressions (MWEs) in Study Abroad (SA). MWEs are conventionalized form-meaning mappings, for example (‘and so’) and (‘actually’), and are assumed to be learned through repeated exposure. Based on this assumption, the study adopted a pretest/posttest design to explore how quantity of out-of-class target-language (TL) contact predicted the development of MWE knowledge among 41 Swedish students during a semester in France. MWE knowledge was assessed by a modified cloze test based on transcriptions of informal language use (www.clapi.fr) and TL contact information was obtained through the Language Engagement Questionnaire (McManus, Mitchell, & Tracy-Ventura, 2014). Contrary to expectations, the findings showed that quantity of out-of-class TL contact did not predict gains in MWE knowledge and add further counterevidence for the role of sheer quantity of TL contact for linguistic development in SA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sar.18001.arv
2019-07-24
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamsson, N. , & Hyltenstam, K.
    (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Apéritif entre ami(e)s – chat , Icor, G. , & Schwartz, S.
    (2009) CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from clapi.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/V3_Corpus_Liste.php?interface_langue=FR
  3. Apéritif entre ami(e)s – Glasgow , Icor, G. , & Gay, J.
    (2009) CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from clapi.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/V3_Corpus_Liste.php?interface_langue=FR
  4. Apéritif entre ami(e)s – rupture , Icor, G. , & Duchanois, J.
    (2009) CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from clapi.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/V3_Corpus_Liste.php?interface_langue=FR
  5. Arvidsson, K.
    (submitted) The learning of multiword expressions in a second language in a Study Abroad context – the role of individual differences.
  6. Bachman, L. F.
    (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker-Smemoe, W. , Dewey, D. P. , Bown, J. , & Martinsen, R. A.
    (2014) Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 464–486. 10.1111/flan.12093
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12093 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. , & Bastos, M. T.
    (2011) Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. 10.1515/iprg.2011.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.017 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) Lextale_FR a fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53(1), 23–37. 10.5334/pb‑53‑1‑23
    https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-53-1-23 [Google Scholar]
  10. Campione, E. , Véronis, J. , & Deulofeu, J.
    (2005) The French corpus. In E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (Eds.), C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages (pp.111–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.15.05cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15.05cam [Google Scholar]
  11. Cobb, T.
    (n.d.). Text Lex Compare. Retrieved from www.lextutor.ca/cgi-bin/tl_compare
  12. CLAPI
    CLAPI (n.d.). Retrieved from clapi.icar.cnrs.fr
  13. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2014) Research on language development during study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp.313–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewey, D. P. , Bown, J. , & Eggett, D.
    (2012) Japanese language proficiency, social networking, and language use during study abroad: Learners’ perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 111–137. 10.3138/cmlr.68.2.111
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.68.2.111 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dörnyei, Z. , Durow, V. , & Zahran, K.
    (2004) Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp.87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.06dor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.06dor [Google Scholar]
  16. Edmonds, A.
    (2014) Conventional expressions: Investigating pragmatics and processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 69–99. 10.1017/S0272263113000557
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000557 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.63–103). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, (pp.49–73). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, N. C. , Simpson-Vlach, R. , & Maynard, C.
    (2008) Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Erman, B. , & Warren, B.
    (2000) The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1(20), 29–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Forsberg, F.
    (2010) Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(1), 25–51. 10.1515/iral.2010.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Forsberg, F. , & Fant, L.
    (2010) Idiomatically speaking: Effects of task variation on formulaic language in highly proficient users of L2 French and Spanish. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp.47–70). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Forsberg Lundell, F. , & Lindqvist, C.
    (2014) Lexical aspects of very advanced L2 French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 28–49. 10.3138/cmlr.1598
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1598 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. González-Fernández, B. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have?ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. 10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  27. Gustafsson, H. , & Verspoor, M.
    (2017) Development of chunks in Dutch L2 learners of English. In E. Tribushinina & J. Evers-Vermeul (Eds.), Usage-Based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching (pp.235–262). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501505492‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505492-011 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kinginger, C.
    (2009) Language learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230240766
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240766 [Google Scholar]
  29. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lemhöfer, K. , & Broersma, M.
    (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0146‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindqvist, C. , Gudmundson, A. , & Bardel, C.
    (2013) A new approach to measuring lexical sophistication in L2 oral production. In C. Bardel , C. Lindqvist , & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp.109–126). Paris: Eurosla Monographs.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McManus, K. , Mitchell, R. , & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2014) Understanding insertion and integration in a study abroad context: The case of English-speaking sojourners in France. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 19(2), 97–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller, G.A.
    (1956) The magic number even plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 91–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Milton, J.
    (2013) Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel , C. Lindqvist , & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp.57–78). Paris: Eurosla Monographs.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchell, R.
    (2015) The development of social relations during residence abroad. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 22–33. 10.1080/17501229.2014.995762
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.995762 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nattinger, J. R. , & DeCarrico, J. S.
    (1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nesselhauf, N.
    (2003) The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied linguistics, 24(2), 223–242. 10.1093/applin/24.2.223
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223 [Google Scholar]
  38. Paquot, M.
    (2017) L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research, 33(1), 13–32. 10.1177/0267658315620265
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315620265 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pérez-Vidal, C.
    (2017) Study abroad and ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, (pp.339–360). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑19
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-19 [Google Scholar]
  40. Read, J.
    (2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511732942
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schmidt, R. W.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmidt, R. W.
    (2012) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. InW. M. Chank, K. N. Chin, S. K. Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp.27–50). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614510932.27
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510932.27 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmitt, N.
    (2013) Formulaic language and collocation. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1–10). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schmitt, N. , Dörnyei, Z. , Adolphs, S. , & Durow, V.
    (2004) Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp.55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.05sch [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmitt, N. , & Redwood, S.
    (2011) Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier , G. Gilquin , & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. A tribute to professor Sylviane Granger (pp.173–208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.45.12sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch [Google Scholar]
  46. Segalowitz, N. , & Freed, B. F.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. 10.1017/S0272263104262027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
  47. Smiskova-Gustafsson, H.
    (2013) Chunks in L2 development: A usage-based perspective. Groningen University.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Taguchi, N. , Li, S. , & Xiao, F.
    (2013) Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2(1), 23–58. 10.1515/caslar‑2013‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2013-0021 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomasello, M.
    (2000) First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive linguistics, 11(1/2), 61–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolter, B. , & Gyllstad, H.
    (2013) Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482. 10.1017/S0272263113000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000107 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sar.18001.arv
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sar.18001.arv
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): L2 French , multiword expressions , target language contact and usage-based approach
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error