1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that suitable preparation for the Erasmus experience can make a significant difference to students. Often, however, institutions have to battle to provide in-depth pre-departure training, and re-entry events or training are too seldom available. Following Erasmus there is rarely space in the curriculum of the home university for reflection, assessment and the integration of the experiences and multi-faceted learning that took place abroad. This article argues that the challenge is therefore to integrate meaningful reflections and assessment into more traditional modules, such as literature-based ones. Accordingly, this article presents some options of how to integrate re-entry reflections in the form of a module on travel literature as well as a voluntary re-entry module that can be offered to returning students irrespective of their course of study. Components of the Erasmus+ CONNECT training programme serve as an example of training material.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sar.18006.hof
2020-02-24
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D.
    (2015) Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C.
    (2002) Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaven, A., & Borghetti, C.
    (2018) Exploring intercultural learning and second language identities in the ERASMUS context. InJ. L. Plews & K. Misfeldt (Eds.), Second language study abroad: Programming, pedagogy, and participant engagement (pp.195–222). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑77134‑2_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77134-2_7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, P. E., & Plowright, D.
    (2010) A multi-dimensional model of reflective learning for professional development. Reflective Practice, 11(2), 245–58. 10.1080/14623941003665810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14623941003665810 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boud, D.
    (2001) Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90(Summer), 9–17. 10.1002/ace.16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.16 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I.
    (2007) Facilitating reflective learning in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brubaker, C.
    (2017) Re-thinking re-entry: new approaches to supporting students after study abroad. Die Unterrichtspraxis. A Journal of the American Association of Teachers of German, 50(2), 109–119. 10.1111/tger.12036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12036 [Google Scholar]
  8. Byram, M.
    (2009) Evaluation and/or assessment of intercultural competence. InA. Hu & M. Byram (Eds.), Interkulturelle Kompetenz und fremdsprachliches Lernen – Modelle, Empirie, Evaluation (pp.215–226). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Byram, M., & Dervin, F.
    (Eds.) (2008) Student, staff and academic mobility in higher education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrington, S., & Selva, G.
    (2010) Critical social theory and transformative learning: Evidence in pre-service teachers’ service-learning reflection logs. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 45–57. 10.1080/07294360903421384
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903421384 [Google Scholar]
  11. Civico, M.
    (2015) Ways to overcome reverse culture shock. Retrieved from theconcordian.com/2015/02/ways-to-overcome-reverse-culture-shock/ (12March12 2018).
  12. Cole, M., & Wertsch, J.
    (1996) Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250–256. 10.1159/000278475
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000278475 [Google Scholar]
  13. CONNECT
    CONNECT (2018) Intercultural learning network 4 Europe: Scientific evaluation of face to face curriculum, online curriculum and experience map (Final report). Retrieved from https://weconnecteurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CONNECT_Final-report_Scientific-evaluation.pdf (8March 2019).
  14. CONNECT Intercultural Learning Network
    CONNECT Intercultural Learning Network. (n.d.). Retrieved from the CONNECT website weconnecteurope.eu/ (6March 2019).
  15. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2018a) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages (15July 2019).
  16. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2018b) European Language Portfolio (ELP). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio (15July 2019).
  17. Dewey, J.
    (1916) Democracy and education. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. European Union
    European Union. (n.d.). Erasmus+ Mobile App. Retrieved from https://erasmusapp.eu/ (6March 2019).
  19. Feng, J.
    (2016) Improving intercultural competence in the classroom: A reflective development model. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 27(1), 4–22. 10.1080/08975930.2016.1172540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2016.1172540 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernández-Peña, R., Fuentes-Pumarola, C., Malagón-Aguilera, M., Bonmatí-Tomàs, A., Bosch-Farré, C., & Ballester-Ferrando, D.
    (2016) The evaluation of reflective learning from the nursing student’s point of view: A mixed method approach. Nurse Education Today, 44, 59–65. 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Colomer, J., Fernández Peña, R., & Pérez Burriel, M.
    (2016) Reflective learning in higher education: A qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1008–1022. 10.1080/03075079.2014.950563
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.950563 [Google Scholar]
  22. Granott, N.
    (1993) Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. InR. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp.183–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gullahorn, J. E., & Gullahorn, J. T.
    (1963) An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 33–47. 10.1111/j.1540‑4560.1963.tb00447.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00447.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U.
    (Eds.) (2015) Developing online language teaching research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137412263
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412263 [Google Scholar]
  25. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R.
    (2000) An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development48(3), 23–48. 10.1007/BF02319856
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856 [Google Scholar]
  26. Holfter, G., & Rieder, M.
    (2018a) “Things I would have liked to know before” – How to Enhance the Erasmus Experience. GFL – German as a Foreign Language, 1, 68–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2018b) CONNECT Re-entry Module 1, slide 19. Retrieved from https://weconnecteurope.eu/project-results/ (27June 2018).
  28. Holmes, P., Bavieri, L., Ganassin, S., & Murphy, J.
    (2016) Interculturality and the study abroad experience: students’ learning from the IEREST materials. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 452–469. 10.1080/14708477.2016.1168054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1168054 [Google Scholar]
  29. IEREST
    IEREST (2015) Intercultural education resources for Erasmus students and their teachers. Koper: Annales University Press. Retrieved from humbox.ac.uk/4536/1/IEREST_manual_for_web.pdf (6March 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. InterCultur
    InterCultur (2017) Mentors training. Retrieved from https://weconnecteurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Manual_Mentor.pdf (27June 2019).
  31. Jackson, J.
    (2006) Ethnographic preparation for short-term study and residence in the target culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), 77–98. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kolb, D. A.
    (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A.
    (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. 10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
    https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 [Google Scholar]
  34. Koong, C., Yang, T., Wu, C., Li, H., & Tseng, C.
    (2014) An investigation into effectiveness of different reflective learning strategies for learning operational software. Computers & Education, 72(C), 167–186. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Krzaklewska, E., & Skórska, P.
    (2013) Culture shock during ERASMUS exchange – Determinants, processes, prevention. InB. Feyen & E. Krzaklewska (Eds.), The ERASMUS phenomenon – Symbol of a new European generation? (pp.105–126). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lewin, K.
    (1951) Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Little, D.
    (2005) The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321–336. 10.1191/0265532205lt311oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt311oa [Google Scholar]
  38. Lysgaard, S.
    (1955) Adjustment in a foreign society: Norwegian Fulbright grantees visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin, 7, 45–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Moon, J. A.
    (1999) Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Cogan Page.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2004) A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oberg, K.
    (1960) Culture shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177–182. 10.1177/009182966000700405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009182966000700405 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pawar, M.
    (2017) Reflective learning and teaching in social work field education in international contexts. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 198–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pérez-Encinas, A., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J., & Josek, M.
    (2017) Problematic areas of host university support services for short-term mobility students. Journal of International Students, 7(4), 1030–1047.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez Burriel, M., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Fernández, R., & Colomer, J.
    (2013) Reflective learning in higher education: A mixed quantitative-qualitative analysis of students’ appraisals. Proceedings of the 6th international conference of education, research and innovation (pp.384–391). Seville: IATED.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pusch, M. D.
    (Ed.) (1979) Multicultural education: A cross cultural training approach. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rodgers, C.
    (2002) Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Voices inside schools. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253. 10.17763/haer.72.2.5631743606m15751
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.2.5631743606m15751 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ryan, M.
    (2013) The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2): 144–55. 10.1080/13562517.2012.694104
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.694104 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ryan, M., & Ryan, M.
    (2013) Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2): 244–57. 10.1080/07294360.2012.661704
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.661704 [Google Scholar]
  49. Savicki, V.
    (2008) Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schön, D.
    (1983) The reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Terry, E.
    (2017) Battling the post-Erasmus blues: Culture shock, again?Retrieved from meetinghalfway.eu/2017/02/battling-the-post-erasmus-blues-culture-shock-again/ (12March 2018).
  52. Turner, S., & Beddoes, L.
    (2007) Using reflective models to enhance learning: Experiences of staff and students. Nurse Education in Practice, 7(3): 135–140. 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.04.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  53. VuHuong, J.
    (2016) How to deal with reverse culture-shock after returning from abroad. Retrieved from https://erasmusu.com/en/erasmus-hanoi/erasmus-experiences/how-to-deal-with-reverse-culture-shock-after-returning-from-abroad-421205 (12March 2018).
  54. Weidemann, A., Straub, J., & Nothnagel, S.
    (Eds.) (2010) Wie lehrt man interkulturelle. Kompetenz? Theorien, Methoden und Praxis in der Hochschulausbildung. Ein Handbuch. Bielefeld: Transcript. 10.14361/9783839411506
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839411506 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sar.18006.hof
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error