1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Employing an ecological framework, this study explores learners’ visual representation of their language learning practices and environments beyond the classroom in an Australian context. Specifically, this study’s aim is to better understand the features of individual language learning environments, the role of self-reflection, and the affordances involved in the construction of these environments. One hundred and seventy international students enrolled in English Language Intensive Courses for Overseas Students (ELICOS) in Sydney drew mind maps on “Activities to improve my English in Australia.” The mind maps were analyzed thematically using NVivo 11 software and subsequent themes were developed. Findings showed individual differences in features of language learning environments, learners’ perceptions of their affordances, and insight into the degree of learner agency as seen from the visualization. This article closes by discussing the implications for using such visual materials in second language pedagogy in order to understand student language learning beyond the classroom.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21003.kas
2022-10-03
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M.
    (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, H. W.
    (2010) What shapes short-term study abroad experiences? A comparative case study of students’ motives and goals. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(5), 452–470. 10.1177/1028315309334739
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315309334739 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aro, M.
    (2016) In action and inaction: English learners authoring their agency. InP. Kalaja, A. M. F. Barcelos, M. Aro, & M. Ruohotie-Lyhty (Eds.), Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.48–65). Springer. 10.1057/9781137425959_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137425959_4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aronin, L., & Singleton, D.
    (2012) Affordances theory in multilingualism studies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 311–331. 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3 [Google Scholar]
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics
    Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) Census QuickStats. Reviewed on3 June 2022fromwww.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/2016%20QuickStats
  6. Bagnoli, A.
    (2009) Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547–570. 10.1177/1468794109343625
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barron, B.
    (2004) Learning ecologies for technological fluency in a technology-rich community. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1–36. 10.2190/1N20‑VV12‑4RB5‑33VA
    https://doi.org/10.2190/1N20-VV12-4RB5-33VA [Google Scholar]
  8. (2006) Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224. 10.1159/000094368
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368 [Google Scholar]
  9. Benson, P.
    (2021) Language learning environments: Spatial perspectives on SLA. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benson, P., Chappell, P., & Yates, L.
    (2018) A day in the life: Mapping international students’ language learning environments in multilingual Sydney. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 20–32. 10.29140/ajal.v1n1.21
    https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v1n1.21 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benson, P., & Reinders, H.
    (Eds.) (2011) Beyond the language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230306790
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790 [Google Scholar]
  12. Borg, S., Birello, M., Civera, I., & Zanatta, T.
    (2014) The impact of teacher education on pre-service primary English language teachers. British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Briggs, J.
    (2015) Out-of-class language contact and vocabulary gain in a study abroad context. System, 53, 129–140. 10.1016/j.system.2015.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B.
    (1995) The mind map book. BBC Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, S., & Gomes, C.
    (2017) Digital journeys: A perspective on understanding the digital experiences of international students. Journal of International Students, 7(2), 347–466. 10.32674/jis.v7i2.385
    https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i2.385 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chik, A.
    (2019) Becoming and being multilingual in Australia. InP. Kalaja & S. Melo-Pfeifer (Eds.), Visualising multilingual lives: More than words (pp.15–32). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788922616‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922616-006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chik, A., Benson, P., & Moloney, R.
    (Eds.) (2018) Multilingual Sydney. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351215541
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351215541 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coleman, J. A.
    (2013) Researching whole people and whole lives. InC. Kinginger (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of language learning in study abroad (pp.17–44). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.37.02col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.37.02col [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) Social circles during residence abroad: What students do, and who with. InR. Mitchell, N. Tracy-Ventura, & K. McManus (Eds.), Social interaction, identity and language learning during residence abroad (pp.33–52). EuroSLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Coleman, J. A., & Chafer, T.
    (2010) Study abroad and the internet: Physical and virtual context in an era of expanding telecommunications. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 19, 151–167. 10.36366/frontiers.v19i1.278
    https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v19i1.278 [Google Scholar]
  21. Creswell, J. W.
    (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Davies, M.
    (2011) Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 62(3), 279–301. 10.1007/s10734‑010‑9387‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6 [Google Scholar]
  23. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2007) Study abroad as foreign language practice. InR. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.208–226). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., Baker, W., Martinsen, R. A., Gold, C. G., & Eggett, D.
    (2014) Language use in six study abroad programs: An exploratory analysis of possible predictors. Language Learning, 64(1), 36–71. 10.1111/lang.12031
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12031 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dufva, H., & Aro, M.
    (2015) Dialogical view on language learners’ agency: Connecting intrapersonal with interpersonal. InP. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp.37–53). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Durbidge, L.
    (2019) Technology and L2 engagement in study abroad: Enabler or immersion breaker?System, 80, 224–234. 10.1016/j.system.2018.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Emmison, M.
    (2011) Conceptualizing visual data. InD. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R., & Carmichael, P.
    (2007) The design and use of a mapping tool as a baseline means of identifying an organization’s active networks. International journal of Research & Methods in Education, 30(2), 127–147. 10.1080/17437270701383271
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701383271 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fryer, M., & Roger, P.
    (2018) Transformations in the L2 self: Changing motivation in a study abroad context. System, 78, 158–172. 10.1016/j.system.2018.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hall, R.
    (2009) Towards a fusion of formal and informal learning environments: The impact of the read/write web. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(1), 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Holliday, A.
    (2010) Analyzing qualitative data. InB. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp.98–110). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jackson, J.
    (2013) The transformation of ‘a frog in the well’: A path to a more intercultural, global mindset. InC. Kinginger (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of language learning in study abroad (pp.179–206). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.37.08jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.37.08jac [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015) Preparing students for the global workplace: The impact of a semester abroad. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 76–91. 10.1080/14708477.2014.985307
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985307 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jackson, J., & Oguro, S.
    (Eds.) (2017) Intercultural interventions in study abroad. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315276595
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276595 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., Palvianen, A., & Dufva, H.
    (2011) From milk cartons to English roommates: Context and agency in L2 learning beyond the classroom. InP. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp.47–58). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230306790_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kashiwa, M.
    (2019) Ecologies of language learning and teaching: Teacher cognition of language learning environments beyond the classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University.
  37. Kashiwa, M., & Benson, P.
    (2018) A road and a forest: Conceptions of in-class and out-of-class learning in the transition to study abroad. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1–23. 10.1002/tesq.409
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.409 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kinchin, I. M.
    (2014) Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: A critical analysis of recent reviews. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 62(1), 39–49. 10.1080/07377363.2014.872011
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2014.872011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kinginger, C.
    (2008) Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 1–124. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00821.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00821.x [Google Scholar]
  40. (2010) American students abroad: Negotiation of difference?Language Teaching, 43, 216–227. 10.1017/S0261444808005703
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005703 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. V.
    (2008) Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. InP. A. Duff & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.) (pp.17–28). Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_194
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_194 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lai, C.
    (2015) Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: Accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265–284. 10.1080/17501229.2014.918982
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.918982 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2017) Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lai, C., & Gu, M.
    (2011) Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. 10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417 [Google Scholar]
  45. Magnan, S. S., & Back, M.
    (2007) Social interaction and linguistic gain during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 43–61. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2007.tb02853.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02853.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Maréea, T. J., van Bruggenb, J. M., & Jochemsc, W. M. G.
    (2013) Effective self-regulated science learning through multimedia-enriched skeleton concept maps. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 16–30. 10.1080/02635143.2013.782283
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.782283 [Google Scholar]
  47. Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L.
    (Eds.) (2011) The Sage handbook of visual research methods. Sage. 10.4135/9781446268278
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278 [Google Scholar]
  48. Menezes, V.
    (2011) Affordances for language learning beyond the classroom. InP. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp.59–71). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230306790_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Morfidi, E., Mikropoulos, A., & Rogdaki, A.
    (2018) Using concept mapping to improve poor readers’ understanding of expository text. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 271–286. 10.1007/s10639‑017‑9600‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9600-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Murray, G., & Fujishima, N.
    (2013) Social language learning spaces: Affordances in a community of learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 140–159. 10.1515/cjal‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O.
    (2006) Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. 10.3102/00346543076003413
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413 [Google Scholar]
  52. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B.
    (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173469 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nunan, D., & Richards, J. C.
    (Eds.) (2015) Language learning beyond the classroom. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315883472
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883472 [Google Scholar]
  54. Palfreyman, D. M.
    (2006) Social context and resources for language learning. System, 34(4), 352–370. 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2014) The ecology of learner autonomy. InG. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp.175–191). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137290243_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290243_10 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pearson, M., & Somekh, B.
    (2003) Concept-mapping as a research tool: A study of primary children’s representations of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 5–22. 10.1023/A:1023970123406
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023970123406 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pole, C. J.
    (Ed.) (2004) Seeing is believing? Approaches to visual research. Elsevier. 10.1016/S1042‑3192(2004)7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3192(2004)7 [Google Scholar]
  58. Poole, D. L., & Davis, T. S.
    (2006) Concept mapping to measure outcomes in study abroad programs. Social Work Education, 25(1), 61–77. 10.1080/02615470500477920
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500477920 [Google Scholar]
  59. Reinders, H.
    (2014) Personal learning environments for supporting out-of-class language learning. English Teaching Forum, 52(4), 14–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Reinders, H., & Benson, P.
    (2017) Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–578. 10.1017/S0261444817000192
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000192 [Google Scholar]
  61. Reinders, H., & White, C.
    (2011) Special issue commentary: Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Reynolds-Case, A.
    (2013) The value of short-term study abroad: An increase in students’ cultural and pragmatic competency. Foreign Language Annals, 46(2), 311–322. 10.1111/flan.12034
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12034 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rose, G.
    (2012) Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (3rd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sockett, G.
    (2014) The online informal learning of English. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137414885
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414885 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stanczak, G. C.
    (Ed.) (2007) Visual research methods: Image, society, and representation. Sage. 10.4135/9781412986502
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986502 [Google Scholar]
  66. Steffensen, S. V.
    (2013) Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. InS. J. Cowley & F. Vallee-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain (pp.195–221). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑5125‑8_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tanaka, K.
    (2007) Japanese students’ contact with English outside of the classroom during study abroad. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 36–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Tattersall, C., Watts, A., & Vernon, S.
    (2007) Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nursing Times, 103(26), 32–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Toffoli, D.
    (2020) Informal learning and institution-wide language provision: University language learners in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑37876‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37876-9 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tzeng, J.-Y.
    (2010) Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 128–147. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2009.01404.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01404.x [Google Scholar]
  71. Umino, T., & Benson, P.
    (2016) Communities of practice in study abroad: A four-year study of an Indonesian student’s experience in Japan. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (4), 757–774. 10.1111/modl.12351
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12351 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wheeldon, J.
    (2010) Mapping mixed methods research: Methods, measures, and meaning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 87–102. 10.1177/1558689809358755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809358755 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wheeldon, J., & Ahlberg, M. K.
    (2012) Visualizing social science research: Maps, methods, & meaning. Sage. 10.4135/9781483384528
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384528 [Google Scholar]
  74. White, C., & Bown, J.
    (2018) Emotion in the construction of space, place and autonomous learning opportunities. InG. Murray & T. Lamb (Eds.), Space, place and autonomy in language learning (pp.29–43). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Whiting, M., & Sines, D.
    (2012) Mind maps: Establishing ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 20(1), 21–27. 10.7748/nr2012.09.20.1.21.c9304
    https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.09.20.1.21.c9304 [Google Scholar]
  76. Withagen, R., de Poel, H. J., Araujo, D., & Pepping, G.-J.
    (2012) Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 250–258. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21003.kas
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21003.kas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error