1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2405-5522
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5530
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of multiple speech acts during study abroad. Participants were 109 American learners of Chinese recruited from a study abroad program in China. They were divided into a higher proficiency (HP) group and a lower proficiency (LP) group based on their scores on a standardized Chinese proficiency test. The participants completed a computerized oral Discourse Completion Test (DCT) that assessed the production of compliment response, refusal, and request as pre- and posttests. The learners’ oral productions were analyzed according to measures of appropriateness rating and speech rate. Linguistic analysis was performed to examine changes in strategy preference and distribution across the three speech acts. Results revealed a complex relationship between proficiency, speech act type, pragmatic performance measure (e.g., appropriateness, speech rate), and ways that pragmatic changes are evaluated (e.g., developmental trajectory, amount of gain).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21014.li
2022-04-19
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
    (2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 42–65. 10.1093/applin/amr031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, J. L.
    (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z.
    (1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–263. 10.2307/3587583
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.
    (1993) Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 279–304. 10.1017/S0272263100012122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012122 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barron, A.
    (2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: How to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bella, S.
    (2011) Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: Effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1718–1740. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bialystok, E.
    (1993) Symbolic representation and attentional control. InG. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Ed.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp.43–57). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
    (Eds.) (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, R., & Yang, D.
    (2010) Responding to compliments in Chinese: Has it changed?Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1951–1963. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Y., & Liu, J.
    (2016) Constructing a scale to assess L2 written speech act performance: WDCT and e-mail tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 231–250. 10.1080/15434303.2016.1213844
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1213844 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diao, W.
    (2016) Peer socialization into gendered Mandarin practices in a study abroad context: Talk in the dorm. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 599–620. 10.1093/applin/amu053
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu053 [Google Scholar]
  12. Félix-Brasdefer, C.
    (2004) Interlanguage refusals: Linguistic politeness and length of residence in the target community. Language Learning, 54(4), 587–653. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00281.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00281.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Hong, W.
    (2011) Refusals in Chinese: How do L1 and L2 differ?Foreign Language Annals, 44(1), 122–136. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2010.01123.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01123.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D.
    (1995) Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics. University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin, L.
    (2012) When in China, do as the Chinese do? Learning compliment responding in a study abroad program. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(2), 211–240. 10.1515/caslar‑2012‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2012-0013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, H.
    (2013) The influence of social situations on fluency difficulty in Korean EFL learners’ oral refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 168–186. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee-Wong, S. M.
    (2000) Politeness and face in Chinese culture. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, S.
    (2012) The effects of input-based practice on pragmatic development of requests in L2 Chinese. Language Learning, 62(2), 403–438. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00629.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00629.x [Google Scholar]
  19. (2013) Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese. InN. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp.43–69). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.36.04li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.36.04li [Google Scholar]
  20. (2014) The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, 45, 103–116. 10.1016/j.system.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, S., & Taguchi, N.
    (2014) The effects of practice modality on the development of pragmatic performance in L2 Chinese. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 794–812. 10.1111/modl.12123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12123 [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, S., Taguchi, N., & Xiao, F.
    (2019) Variations in rating scale functioning in assessing pragmatic performance in L2 Chinese. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(3), 271–293. 10.1080/15434303.2019.1648473
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1648473 [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, J.
    (2006) Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsumura, S.
    (2003) Modeling the relationship among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 465–491. 10.1093/applin/24.4.465
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.465 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pérez Vidal, C., & Shively, R.
    (2019) L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp.355–371). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Phoocharoensil, S.
    (2012) L2 English compliment responses: An investigation of pragmatic transfer. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 276–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinto, D.
    (2005) The acquisition of requests by second language learners of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 2(1), 1–27. 10.1075/sic.2.1.01pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.2.1.01pin [Google Scholar]
  28. Ren, W.
    (2012) Pragmatic development in Chinese speakers’ L2 English refusals. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 63–87. 10.1075/eurosla.12.05ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.12.05ren [Google Scholar]
  29. (2015) L2 pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0734‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0734-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2019) Pragmatic development of Chinese during study abroad: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 137–149. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.017 [Google Scholar]
  31. Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C.
    (2014) Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based test battery. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04598‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04598-7 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sánchez-Hernández, A.
    (2018) Acculturation and pragmatic learning: International students in the United States. InC. Pérez Vidal, S. López-Serrano, J. Ament, & D. J. Thomas-Wilhelm (Eds.), Learning context effects: Study abroad, formal instruction and international immersion classrooms (pp.283–309). Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schauer, G.
    (2009) Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shardakova, M.
    (2005) Intercultural pragmatics in the speech of American L2 learners of Russian: Apologies offered by Americans in Russian. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 423–451. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.423 [Google Scholar]
  35. Shively, R.
    (2011) L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1818–1835. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.030 [Google Scholar]
  36. Su, Y., & Ren, W.
    (2017) Developing L2 pragmatic competence in Mandarin Chinese: Sequential realization of requests. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 433–457. 10.1111/flan.12263
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12263 [Google Scholar]
  37. Taguchi, N.
    (2006) Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16(4), 513–533. 10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag [Google Scholar]
  38. (2007) Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 113–135. 10.1093/applin/aml051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml051 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2008) The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: A comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 423–452. 10.1017/S0272263108080716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080716 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2012) Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847696106
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847696106 [Google Scholar]
  41. Taguchi, N., & Collentine, J.
    (2018) Language learning in a study-abroad context: Research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(4), 553–566. 10.1017/S0261444818000265
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000265 [Google Scholar]
  42. Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Xiao, F.
    (2013) Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study-abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2(1), 23–58. 10.1515/caslar‑2013‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2013-0021 [Google Scholar]
  43. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
    (2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S.
    (2016) Development of pragmatic knowledge in L2 Chinese: Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a study abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 775–796. 10.1111/modl.12349
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12349 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang, X., Taguchi, N., & Li, S.
    (2021) Social contact and speech act strategies in a Chinese study abroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 6(1), 3–31. 10.1075/sar.20002.tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.20002.tan [Google Scholar]
  46. Trosborg, A.
    (1995) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wen, X.
    (2014) Pragmatic development: An exploratory study of requests by learners of Chinese. InZ. Han (Ed.), Studies in Second Language Acquisition of Chinese (pp.30–56). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783092093‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092093-004 [Google Scholar]
  48. Winke, P., & Teng, C.
    (2010) Using task-based pragmatics tutorials while studying abroad in China. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 363–399. 10.1515/iprg.2010.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.016 [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiao, F.
    (2015a) Adult second language learners’ pragmatic development in the study-abroad context: A review. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 25, 132–149. 10.36366/frontiers.v25i1.349
    https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v25i1.349 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2015b) Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 557–581. 10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3
    https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Xiao, F., Taguchi, N., & Li, S.
    (2019) Effects of proficiency sub-skills on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese study abroad. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 469–483. 10.1017/S0272263118000128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000128 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, L., & Ke, C.
    (2021) Proficiency and pragmatic production in L2 Chinese study abroad. System, 98. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102475
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102475 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Y.
    (1995) Strategies in Chinese requesting. InG. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp.23–68). University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21014.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sar.21014.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): L2 Chinese; pragmatic development; proficiency; speech acts
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error