Análisis cognitivo-discursivo y situacional de las formas de tratamiento en función de sujeto y de objeto en español

References

1. Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
   2006 Variación morfosintáctica e interacción social: Análisis del paradigma de los clíticos verbales españoles en los medios de comunicación. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
   2017 “The participants as objects: Variation and meaning of first- and second-person objects in Spanish”. Studia Linguistica71 (2): 1–37.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel y María José Serrano
   2010 “The cognitive bases of linguistic style”. Sociolinguistic Studies4: 115–144. doi: 10.1558/sols.v4i1.115
   https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v4i1.115 [Google Scholar]
4. Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel y María José Serrano
   2013 Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun Subjects. Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0448‑6
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0448-6 [Google Scholar]
5. Ardehali, Paula Elizabeth
   1990 “Pronoun exchange as a barometer of social change”. Dialectal Anthropology15: 82–86.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ariel, Mira
   1990 Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ariel, Mira
   2001 “Accessibility theory: An overview”. En Ted Sanders , Joost Schilperoord y Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.29–87. doi: 10.1075/hcp.8.04ari
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.04ari [Google Scholar]
8. Blas Arroyo, José Luis
   2000 “Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political electoral debate”. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1–27. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00040‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00040-5 [Google Scholar]
9. Blas Arroyo, José Luis
   2005 Sociolingüística del español. Desarrollos y perspectivas en el estudio de la lengua española en contexto social. Madrid: Cátedra.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman
    1960 “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. En Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge: Massachussets University Press, 253–276.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Charaudeau, Patrick y Dominique Maingueneau
    2005 Diccionario de análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Croft, William y Allan D. Cruse
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
13. García, Erica. C.
    2009 The Motivated Syntax of Arbitrary Signs: Cognitive Constraints on Spanish Clitic Clustering. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sfsl.61
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.61 [Google Scholar]
14. García-Miguel, José Miguel
    2015 “Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach”. Folia Linguistica49: 205–256. doi: 10.1515/flin‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
15. Goldberg, Adele
    1995 Constructions: A Construction-grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gundel, Jeanette. K. , Hedberg, Nancy y Ron Zacharski
    1993 “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language69: 274–307. doi: 10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2013 “Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms”. En Dik Bakker y Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp.197–226. doi: 10.1515/9783110331127.197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.197 [Google Scholar]
18. Hummel, Martin
    2010 “Reflexiones metodológicas y teóricas sobre el estudio de las formas de tratamiento en el mundo hispanoablante, a partir de una investigación en Santiago de Chile”. En Martin Hummel , Bettina Kluge y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. México: El Colegio de México, pp.103–162.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kendall, Martha B.
    1981 “Toward a semantic approach to terms of address. A critique of deterministic models in Sociolinguistics”. Language in Communication1 (2–3): 237–254. doi: 10.1016/0271‑5309(81)90014‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(81)90014-8 [Google Scholar]
20. Kerbrat Orecchioni, Catherine
    1992 Les interactions verbales. París: A Colin
    [Google Scholar]
21. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2009 Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
23. Martiny, Thierry
    1996 “Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach”. Language Sciences18 (3–4): 765–775. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(96)00046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00046-0 [Google Scholar]
24. Medina López, Javier
    2009 “El tú del presidente. La ruptura del rol social”. Revista Española de Lingüística39 (1): 77–109.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Montgomery, Martin
    2011 “The accountability interview, politics and change in the UK public service broadcasting”. En Mats Ekström y Marianna Patrona (Eds.), Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.33–35. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.42.06mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.42.06mon [Google Scholar]
26. Mühlhäusler, Peter y Rom Harré
    1990 Pronouns and People. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
27. NGRAE: Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua
    NGRAE: Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua 2009 Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Obeng, Samuel G.
    1997 “Language and politics: indirectness in political discourse”. Discourse and Society8 (1): 49–83. doi: 10.1177/0957926597008001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008001004 [Google Scholar]
29. Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto
    2016 “Discourse, cognition and society”. En Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto (eds.) Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Serrano, María José
    2001 “La deixis social en los usos pronominales de cortesía en español”. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique9–10: 265–280.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Serrano, María José
    2012 El sujeto pronominal usted/ustedes y su posición: variación y creación de estilos comunicativos. Spanish in Context9 (1): 109–131. doi: 10.1075/sic.9.1.05ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.9.1.05ser [Google Scholar]
32. Serrano, María José
    2016 “La variación sintáctica”. En Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica. Londres: Routledge, pp.809–821.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Serrano, María José
    2017 “Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada30 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Serrano, María José
    2018 “Going beyond address forms: Variation and style in the use of the second-person pronouns tú and usted ”. Pragmatics27 (1): 87–11510.1075/prag.27.1.04ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.04ser [Google Scholar]
35. Siewierska, Anna
    2014 Person. Cambridge: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
    2006 “Image building through modality: The case of political interviews”. Discourse and Society7(3): 389–415. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007003005 [Google Scholar]
37. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    1996 “Reconsidering power and distance”. Journal of Pragmatics26:1–24. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00047‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00047-X [Google Scholar]
38. Stewart, Miranda
    2003 “‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular pronoun tú”. Journal of Pragmatics35: 191–206. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00083‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00083-8 [Google Scholar]
39. Watts, Richard , Sachiko, Ide y Konrad Ehrlich
    1992 “Linguistic politeness and politic behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality”. En Richard Watts et al. (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.21–42.
    [Google Scholar]