Atenuación, género discursivo e imagen

References

1. Albelda, Marta
   . Este volumen. “Sobre la incidencia de la imagen en la atenuación pragmática”. Spanish in Context.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Albelda, Marta , Antonio Briz , Ana Cestero , Dorota Kotwica y Cristina Villalba
   2014 “Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español. ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN”. Oralia17: 1–44.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Argyle, Michael , Adrian Furnham y Jean Ann Graham
   1981 Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511558283
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558283 [Google Scholar]
4. Arundale, Robert B.
   2010 “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement”. Journal of Pragmatics42 (8): 2078–2105.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
5. Arundale, Robert B.
   2013a “Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research”. Journal of Pragmatics58: 12–26.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.009 [Google Scholar]
6. Arundale, Robert B.
   2013b “Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives”. Journal of Pragmatics58: 108–120.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013 [Google Scholar]
7. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
   2003 “Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics35(10–11): 1453–1469.10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00173‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X [Google Scholar]
8. Benet, Verónica y Niels G. Waller
   1995 “The Big Seven Factor Model for personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60 (4): 701–718.10.1037/0022‑3514.69.4.701
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.701 [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, Douglas y Susan Conrad
   2009 Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
10. Blake, Robert R. y Jane Mouton
    1964 The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bravo, Diana
    1996 La risa en el regateo: Estudio sobre el estilo comunicativo de negociadores españoles y suecos. Stockholm: Institutionen för spanska och portugisiska.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bravo, Diana
    1999 “¿Imagen positiva vs. Imagen negativa?: Pragmática social y componentes de face”. Oralia2: 155–184.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bravo, Diana
    2003 “Actividades de cortesía, imagen social y contextos socioculturales: una introducción”. EnLa perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: identidad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantesed. por Diana Bravo , 98–108. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bravo, Diana
    2004 “Tensión entre universalidad y relatividad en las teorías de cortesía”. EnPragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en españoled. por Diana Bravo y Antonio Briz , 15–37. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Brown, Penelope y Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
16. Calvi, Maria Vittoria
    2010 “Los géneros discursivos en la lengua del turismo: una propuesta de clasificación”. Ibérica19: 9–32.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Coleman, Nicole V. y Patti Williams
    2013 “Feeling like my self: Emotion profiles and social identity”. Journal of Consumer Research40 (2): 203–222.10.1086/669483
    https://doi.org/10.1086/669483 [Google Scholar]
18. Cupach, William R. y Tadasu Todd Imahori
    1993 “Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships”. EnIntercultural Communication Competenceed. por Richard L. Wiseman y Jolene Koester , 112–131. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Domenici, Kathy y Stephen W. Littlejohn
    2006 Facework: Bridging Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fant, Lars
    1992 “Scandinavians and Spaniards in negotiation”. EnCulture and Management in the Field of Ethnology and Business Administrationed. por Annick Sjögren y Lena Janson , 125–153. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. Institute of International Business.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gao, Ge
    1998 “An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for OTHER in chinese interpersonal communication”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations22 (4): 467–482.10.1016/S0147‑1767(98)00019‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00019-4 [Google Scholar]
22. Giltrow, Janet y Dieter Stein
    2009 Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.188
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.188 [Google Scholar]
23. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction”. Psychiatry: Journal of the Study of Interpersonal Processes18 (3): 213–231.10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
24. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gudykunst, William B. , Yuko Matsumoto , Stella Ting-Toomey , Tsukasa Nishida , Kwangsu Kim y Sam Heyman
    1996 “The influence of cultural individualism-​collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures”. Human Communication Research22 (4): 510–543.10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1996.tb00377.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x [Google Scholar]
26. Haugh, Michael
    2009 “Face and interaction”. EnFace, Communication, and Social Interactioned. por Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini y Michael Haugh , 1–30. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hernández Flores, Nieves
    1999 “Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversation: the case of advice”. Pragmatics9 (1): 37–49.10.1075/prag.9.1.04her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.04her [Google Scholar]
28. Hernández Flores, Nieves
    2002 La cortesía en la conversación española entre familiares y amigos. La búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario. Aalborg: University of Aalborg.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hernández Flores, Nieves
    2013 “Actividad de imagen: caracterización y tipología en la interacción comunicativa”. Pragmática Sociocultural1 (2): 175–198.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ho, David Yau-Fai
    1994 “Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement”. EnThe Challenge of Faceworked. por Stella Ting-Toomey , 269–285. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Holtgraves, Thomas M.
    2002 Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kim, Min-Sun , John E. Hunter , Akira Miyahara , Ann-Marie Horvath , Mary Bresnahan y Hei-Jin Yoon
    1996 “Individual- vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles”. Communication Monographs63: 29–49.10.1080/03637759609376373
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376373 [Google Scholar]
33. Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama
    1991 “Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”. Psychological Review98 (2): 224–253.10.1037/0033‑295X.98.2.224
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 [Google Scholar]
34. Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama
    1994 “A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20: 568–57910.1177/0146167294205013
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205013 [Google Scholar]
35. Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama
    2010 “Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Science5 (4): 420–430.10.1177/1745691610375557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557 [Google Scholar]
36. McCrae, Robert R. , y Paul Costa
    1990 Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Miller, Lynn Carol , Michael J. Cody y Margaret L. McLaughlin
    1994 “Situations and goals as fundamental constructs”. EnHandbook of Interpersonal Communicationed. por Mark L. Knapp y Gerald R. Miller , 162–197. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Morisaki, Seiichi y William B. Gudykunst
    1994 “Face in Japan and the United States”. EnThe Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issuesed. por Stella Ting-Toomey , 47–94. Albany: State University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Oetzel, John
    1999 “The influence of situational features on perceived conflict styles and self-construals in work groups”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations23 (4): 679–695.10.1016/S0147‑1767(99)00015‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00015-2 [Google Scholar]
40. Oetzel, John , Stella Ting-Toomey , Tooko Masuoto , Yumiko Yokochi , Xiaohui Pan , Jiro Takai y Richard Wilcox
    2001 “Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States”. Communication Monographs68 (3): 235–258.10.1080/03637750128061
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128061 [Google Scholar]
41. Oyserman, Daphna
    2001 “Self-concept and identity”. EnThe Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychologyed. por Abraham Tesser y Norbert Schwarz , 499–517. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Putnam, Linda , y Poole, Marshall S.
    1987 “Conflict and negotiation”. EnHandbook of Organizational Communication: An interdisciplinary perspectiveed. por Fredric Jablin , Linda Putnam , Karlene Roberts y Lyman Porter , 459–499. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rahim, Afzalur
    1983 “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”. Academy of Management Journal26: 368–376.10.2307/255985
    https://doi.org/10.2307/255985 [Google Scholar]
44. Rahim, Afzalur
    1992 Managing Conflict in Organizations (2a. edición). Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Roccas, Sonia , Lilach Sagiv , Shalom H. Schwartz y Ariel Knafo
    2002 “The Big Five personality factors and personal values”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28 (6): 789–801.10.1177/0146167202289008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008 [Google Scholar]
46. Sabah, Senay
    2017 “The impact of self-construal and self-concept clarity on socially motivated consumption: the moderating role of materialism”. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science27: 31–45.10.1080/21639159.2016.1265321
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2016.1265321 [Google Scholar]
47. Schlenker, Barry y Beth Pontari
    2000 “The strategic control of information: impression management and self-presentation in daily life”. EnPsychological Perspectives on Self and Identityed. por Tesser, Abraham , Jerry M. Suls y Richard B. Felson , 199–232. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10357‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10357-008 [Google Scholar]
48. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    1992 “Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 1–65.10.1016/S0065‑2601(08)60281‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 [Google Scholar]
49. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    2006 “A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications”. Comparative Sociology5 (2–3): 137–182.10.1163/156913306778667357
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357 [Google Scholar]
50. Schwartz, Shalom H. y Anat Bardi
    2001 “Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology32 (3): 268–290.10.1177/0022022101032003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002 [Google Scholar]
51. Schwartz, Shalom H. y Wolfang Bilsky
    1990 “Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58 (5): 878–891.10.1037/0022‑3514.58.5.878
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878 [Google Scholar]
52. Simon, Bernd
    2004 Identity in modern society. A social psychological perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Singelis, Theodore M.
    1994 “The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20 (5): 580–591.10.1177/0146167294205014
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014 [Google Scholar]
54. Singelis, Theodore M. y William J. Brown
    1995 “Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior”. Human Communication Research21: 354–389.10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1995.tb00351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00351.x [Google Scholar]
55. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2005 “(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships”. Journal of Politeness Research1 (1): 95–119.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
56. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of identity and the analysis of face”. Journal of Pragmatics39: 639–656.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
57. Sternberg, Robert y Diane M. Dobson
    1987 “Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52: 794–812.10.1037/0022‑3514.52.4.794
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.794 [Google Scholar]
58. Thomas, Kenneth W. y Ralph H. Kilmann
    1974 Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Mountain View, Cal.: Xicom.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Thurén, Britt-Marie
    1988 Left hand left behind The changing Gender System of a Barrio in Valencia, Spain. Stockholm: Stockholms Studies in Social Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Ting-Toomey, Stella
    1988 “Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory”. EnTheories in Intercultural Communicationed. por Young Yun Kim y William B. Gudykunst , 213–235. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Ting-Toomey, Stella
    1997 “Intercultural conflict competence”. EnCompetence in Interpersonal Conflicted. por William R. Cupach y Daniel J. Canary , 120–147. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Ting-Toomey, Stella
    2005 “Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries”. EnTheorizing about Intercultural Communicationed. por William B. Gudykunst , 211–233. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ting-Toomey, Stella y Atsuko Kurogi
    1998 “Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations22: 187–225.10.1016/S0147‑1767(98)00004‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2 [Google Scholar]
64. Ting-Toomey, Stella , John G. Oetzel y Kimberlie Yee-Jung
    2001 “Self-construal types and conflict management styles”. Communication Reports14 (2): 87–104.10.1080/08934210109367741
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210109367741 [Google Scholar]
65. Triandis, Harry C.
    1995 Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]