1887
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance. Approaches across linguistic subfields
 
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00038.gut
2019-08-27
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arvaniti, Amalia
    . to appear. “The autosegmental-metrical model of intonational phonology.” InProsodic Theory and Practice ed. by Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Jonathan Barnes eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckman, Mary E. & Janet B. Pierrehumbert
    1986 “Intonational structure in Japanese and English.” Phonology Yearbook3: 255–309. 10.1017/S095267570000066X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckman, Mary E. & Julia Hirschberg
    1994 ToBI annotation conventions. Available (December 2017) atwww.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi
  4. Beckman, Mary E., Julia Hirschberg & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
    2005 “The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework.” InProsodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. bySun-Ah Jun, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohn, Abigail J., Cécile Fougeron & Marie K. Huffman
    2012The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elordieta, Gorka
    2003 “The Spanish intonation of Speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics2: 67–95. 10.5565/rev/catjl.44
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.44 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elordieta, Gorka & Nagore Calleja
    2005 “Microvariation in accentual alignment in Basque Spanish.” Language and Speech48: 397–439. 10.1177/00238309050480040401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480040401 [Google Scholar]
  8. Escandell Vidal, María Victoria
    1998 “Intonation and procedural encoding: The case of Spanish interrogatives.” InCurrent issues in relevance theory, ed. byVilly Rouchota & Andreas H. Jucker, 169–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.58.09esc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.58.09esc [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldsmith, John A.
    1976 Autosegmental Phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. [Reprinted 1979, Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York & London: Garland Publishing].
  10. Ladd, D. Robert
    1996Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
    1980 The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
  12. Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Mary E. Beckman & D. Robert Ladd
    2000 “Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science.” InPhonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. byNoel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr, & Gerard Docherty, 273–303. Oxford University Press. [Reprinted in Abigail C. Cohn, Cécile Fougeron & Marie K. 2011. Handbook of laboratory phonology, 17–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Cynthia G. Clopper
    2010 “What is LabPhon? And where is it going?” Laboratory Phonology10: 113–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, Yi
    2005 “Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions.” Speech communication46: 220–251. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00038.gut
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error