1887
Volume 16, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this study two techniques were used to analyze the linguistic rhythm of Mexican Spanish/English bilinguals in Los Angeles (California): (i)-nPVI, consisting of measurements of durations of successive pairs of vowels, and (ii)-voicing ratios, consisting of a function that calculates the voiced and voiceless portions of the signal. The speech of forty-nine participants in five groups was examined: (G1)-twelve native speakers of English, (G2)-eight Mexican Sp/Eng adult bilinguals who have been in L.A. since childhood, (G3)-eleven Mexican Sp/Eng young bilinguals descendants of immigrants and born in L.A., (G4)-seven Mexican Sp/Eng adult bilinguals who moved to L.A. as adults and (G5)-eleven native speakers of Spanish who have stayed in L.A. for a short period of time. Both methodologies indicate that G1 and G2 show English-like rhythm in both languages while G4 and G5 present Spanish-like rhythm. G3 accommodates rhythm depending on the language. Results reveal how rhythm can suffer attrition and transfer processes depending on the age or length of exposure to the L2. The study also highlights the unique linguistic situation of Los Angeles where members of the Mexican community have different levels of exposure to the Spanish and English languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00045.rob
2020-01-17
2020-07-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, David
    1967Elements of General Phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilar, L. Machuca
    1995 “Intentionality in the speech act and phonetic reduction phenomena”. InProceedings of XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, Paul and David Weenink
    2009 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.1.17) [Computer program]. RetrievedOctober 9, 2009, fromwww.praat.org/
  4. Brookes, Mike
    2003 VOICEBOX – MATLAB Toolbox for Speech Processing. Retrieved fromwww.ee.ic.ac.uk/hp/staff/dmb/voicebox/voicebox.html
  5. Carter, Phillip M.
    2005 “Quantifying Rhythmic Differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English.” InTheoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 272), ed. by Randall Gess and Edward J. Rubin , 63–75. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.272.05car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.272.05car [Google Scholar]
  6. Carter, Phillip M. and Tonya Wolford
    2016 “Cross-generational prosodic convergence in South Texas Spanish”. Spanish in Context13: 29–52. 10.1075/sic.13.1.02car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.1.02car [Google Scholar]
  7. Dasher, Richard and Dwight Bolinger
    1982 “On Pre-accentual Lengthening.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association12: 58–69. 10.1017/S0025100300002462
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300002462 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dauer, Richard
    1983 “Stress-timing and Syllable-timing Reanalyzed.” Journal of Phonetics11: 51–62. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30776‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30776-4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dellwo, Volher , Adrian Fourcin and Evelyn Abberton
    2007 “Rhythmical Classification Based on Voice Parameters”. International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Deterding, David
    2001 The Measurement of Rhythm: A Comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics29: 217–230. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0138
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0138 [Google Scholar]
  11. Flor, Ashley and Amanda Bogart
    2009 Second Language Rhythm. Poster presented at theUniversity of Southern California Undergraduate Research Symposium 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fought, Carmen
    2003Chicano English in Context. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230510012
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grabe, Esther and Ee Low
    2002 “Durational Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis.” InPapers in Laboratory Phonology7, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner , 377–401. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197105.515
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.515 [Google Scholar]
  14. Grabe, Esther , Brechtje Post and Ian Watson
    1999 “The Acquisition of Rhythmic Patterns in English and French.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1201–1204. San Francisco.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gut, Ulrike
    2003 “Prosody in Second Language Speech Production: The Role of the Native Language.” Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen32: 133–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris, Michael J. and Stefan Th. Gries
    2011 “Measures of Speech Rhythm and the Role of Corpus-based Word Frequency: A Multifactorial Comparison of Spanish(-English) Speakers.” International Journal of English Studies11(2): 1–22. 10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149621
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149621 [Google Scholar]
  17. Labov, William
    1972 The social motivation of a sound change. InSociolinguistic Patterns. ed. by William Labov , 1–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lope Blanch, Juan
    1963 “Sobre las Vocales Caedizas del Español Mexicano.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica17: 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Low, Ee
    1998 Prosodic Prominence in Singapore English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  20. Low, Ee and Esther Grabe
    1995 “Prosodic Patterns in Singapore English.” Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences3: 636–639, Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Low, Ee , Esther Grabe and Francis Nolan
    2000 “Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English.” Language and Speech43: 377–401. 10.1177/00238309000430040301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309000430040301 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nava, Emily
    2010 Connecting Phrasal and Rhythmic Events: Evidence from Second Language Speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
  23. Nava, Emily and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta
    2009 “Order of Acquisition of Prosodic Prominence Patterns: Evidence from L1Spanish/L2English Speech.” Proceedings of the 3rd Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Rourke, Erin
    2008 “Correlating Speech Rhythm: Evidence from Two Peruvian Dialects.” Selected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (Canada): October19–22 2006 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Perissinotto, Giorgio
    1975Fonología del Español Hablado en la Ciudad de México. Guanajuato, Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pike, Kenneth L.
    1945The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prieto, Pilar & Paolo Roseano
    (eds.) 2010Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Lincom Europa: München.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ramus, Franck , Marina Nespor and Jaques Mehler
    1999 “Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm in the Speech Signal.” Cognition73: 265–292. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00058‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X [Google Scholar]
  29. Shousterman, Cara
    2014 “Speaking English in Spanish Harlem: The Role of Rhythm”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics20 (2): 157–168.
  30. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
    2001Sociolingüística y Pragmática del Español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas, Erik
    2010Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Thomas, Erik and Phillip M. Carter
    2003 “A First Look at Rhythm in Southern African American and European American English.” New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV, 32): Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. White, Laurence and Sven L. Mattys
    2007 “Calibrating Rhythm: First Language and Second Language Studies.” Journal of Phonetics35: 501–522. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00045.rob
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00045.rob
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bilingualism , rhythm and Spanish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error