1887
Volume 16, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Mandarin Chinese and Spanish are the first two languages in the world by number of speakers. The interaction between speakers and thus between the two languages increases day by day. There are more and more Chinese students who study Spanish and Spanish students who study Chinese. At the same time, difficulties arise from the teaching-learning process, particularly with regard to phonetics, and more specifically the intonation, as they are two typologically-different languages. However, there exist very few comparative studies between them.

This article seeks to explore the global declination of intonation groups in Spanish and Mandarin Chinese and we found similarities and differences between these two languages. To do this, we created a corpus of 278 isolated and unmarked sentences and 140 neutral paragraphs in Mandarin Chinese (totally 651 sentences), while in Spanish we used data from previous studies. The corpus was recorded by nine native speakers, three men and six women.

We approached this study from a phonetic point of view and used the Garrido model (Garrido 199620012010) to compare the declination effect on the two languages according to different factors such as sentence type, the position of the intonation group within the utterance and length of the group.

We also proposed for future study some possible methods for teaching Chinese and Spanish intonation as a second language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00049.yao
2020-01-17
2020-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.
    Praat: doing phonetics by computer. www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. [Last access: 22-04-2018]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Collier, R.
    1975 “Physiological correlates of intonation patterns.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America58: 249–255. 10.1121/1.380654
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380654 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper, W. E. and Sorensen, J. M.
    1981Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8093‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8093-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fant, L.
    1984 “Estructura informativa en español. Estudio sintáctico y entonativo.” Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Stockholm: Almqvist y Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrido, J. M.
    1996 Modelling Spanish Intonation for Text–to–Speech Applications. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  6. 2001 “La estructura de las curvas melódicas del español: propuesta de modelización.” LEA: Lingüística Española Actual23 (2): 173–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010 “A tool for automatic F0 stylisation, annotation and modelling of large corpora.” Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gussenhoven, C.
    2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiang, P. y Chen, A.
    2011 “Representation of Mandarin intonations: boundary tone revisited.” NACCL 23, Vol.1: 97–109. University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ladd, D. R.
    1984 “Declination: a review and some hypotheses.” Phonology YearbookVol.1: 53–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, M.
    2002 “普通话语句的韵律结构和基频高低线构建 [Prosodic Structure and Lines of F0 Top and Bottom of Utterances in Chinese].” 《当代语言学》 [Contemporary Linguistics] 4 (4): 254–265. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2004 “On production and perception of boundary tone in Chinese intonation.” TAL 2004, Beijing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2006 “Interrogative vs. declarative and the boundary tone in Standard Chinese.” 《中国语文》 [Chinese Language] 4: 364–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Maeda, S.
    1976 A Characterization of American English Intonation. PhD thesis, MIT.
  15. Navarro, T.
    1944Manual de entonación española. Madrid: Guadarrama 1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Prieto, P. , Nibert, H. and Shih, C.
    1995 “The absence or presence of a declination effect on the descent of F0 peaks?: Evidence from Mexican Spanish.” InGrammatical Theory and Romance Languages, ed. by K. Zagona , 197–207. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Prieto, P. , Shih, C. and Nibert, H.
    1996 “Pitch downtrend in Spanish.” Journal of Phonetics24: 445–473. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0024 [Google Scholar]
  18. Shen, X.
    1990The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese. California: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shih, C.
    2000 “A declination model of Mandarin Chinese.” InIntonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology, ed. by A. Botinis , 243–268. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4317‑2_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_11 [Google Scholar]
  20. Thorsen, N.
    1980 “Intonation Contours and Stress Group Patterns in Declarative Sentences of Varying Length in ASC Danish.” Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen14: 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yao, J.
    2015 Estudio comparativo de las curvas melódicas del español y del chino mandarín. PhD thesis, Universidad Internacional de Menéndez Pelayo.
  22. Yuan, J. and Liberman, M.
    2010 “F0 Declination in English and Mandarin broadcast news speech.” INTERSPEECH 2010: 134–137. Makuhari, Chiba.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan, J. , Shih, C. and Kochanski, G. P.
    2002 “Comparison of declarative and interrogative intonation in Chinese.” Speech Prosody 2002: 711–714. Aix–en–Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00049.yao
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00049.yao
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): F0 declination , intonation groups , language teaching , Mandarin Chinese and Spanish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error