Review of Adriana Bolívar. 2018. Political Discourse as Dialogue. A Latin American Perspective

References

1. Fairclough, Norman
   2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
2. García Negroni, María Marta
   2009 “Dialogismo y polifonía enunciativa. Apuntes para una reelaboración de la distinción discurso/historia”. Páginas de Guarda. Revista de Lenguaje, Edición y Cultura Escrita (7): 15–31.
   [Google Scholar]
3. García Negroni, María Marta
   1988 “La Destinación en el Discurso Político: una categoría múltiple.” Lenguaje en ContextoI (1/2): Buenos Aires85–111.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Halliday, Michael
   1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Halliday, Michael and Christian Matthiessen
   2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd. Ed.). London: Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Halperin Donghi, Tulio
   2011 Historia contemporánea de América Latina. Buenos Aires/Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lakoff, George
   1991 “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf”. Peace Research23: 25–32.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Oppenheimer, Andrés
   2015 “What Trump has in common with Hugo Chávez”. Accessed23 July 2018. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/article28665166.html
9. Sigal, Silvia and Eliseo Verón
   2010 Perón o Muerte. Los fundamentos discursivos del fenómeno peronista. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer
    Eds. 2001 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9780857028020
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]