1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the perceptions of inclusive language among first- and second-generation Spanish speakers residing in North Carolina, USA, based on survey data collected from 337 speakers by undergraduates. The survey examines familiarity with innovative inclusive language forms (including -@, -x, and -e), as well as opinions about different forms (including standard morphology forms such as masculine default and noun doubling – i.e., ), and reported use of inclusive forms. A majority of participants expressed negative opinions of innovative forms, and very few reported actually using them in their speech. Acceptance varied based not only on participant social characteristics, but also on the morphology and the context in which the form is used. Exceptions to these trends, as well as the possible future development of inclusive language forms, receive additional attention. Research methodologies with undergraduates are also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00084.mic
2023-06-13
2025-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amador, Carmen
    2020No molesta el lenguaje inclusivo, lo que molesta es el feminismo. El Tribuno. https://www.eltribuno.com/jujuy/nota/2020-1-26-0-0-0--no-molesta-el-lenguaje-inclusivo-lo-que-molesta-es-el-feminismo
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anunciante
    Anunciante 2020#España| Tema cerrado: “Todes” no se acepta en la Real Academia Española. https://eldiverso.com/2020/01/09/espana-tema-cerrado-todesno-se-acepta-en-la-real-academia-espanola/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Battista Lo Bianco, Lucía
    2016¿Qué pasa cuando hablamos con “X” y con “E”?. La Izquierda Diario. www.laizquierdadiario.com/Que-pasa-cuando-hablamos-con-X-y-con-E
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Betti, Silvia
    2017 “Lenguas, culturas y sensibilidades en los Estados Unidos: Español y Spanglish en un mundo inglés.” Hispania100 (5): 35–40. 10.1353/hpn.2018.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2018.0006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carolina Demography
    Carolina Demography 2020North Carolina’s Hispanic Community: 2020 Snapshot. https://www.ncdemography.org/2021/02/05/north-carolinas-hispanic-community-2020-snapshot/ (Accessed25 May, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carvalho, Ilombe
    2019Lenguaje inclusivo ¿de dónde proviene?La Izquierda Diario. www.laizquierdadiario.mx/Lenguaje-inclusivo-de-donde-proviene
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbett, Greville
    2013 “Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems.” InThe World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byM. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmat. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DeGuzmán, María
    2017 “Latinx: ¡Estamos aquí!, or being “Latinx” at UNC-Chapel Hill.” Cultural Dynamics29 (3): 214–230. 10.1177/0921374017727852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374017727852 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Onís, Catalina
    2017 “What’s in an “x”?: An Exchange about the Politics of “Latinx.” Chiricú1 (2): 78–91. 10.2979/chiricu.1.2.07
    https://doi.org/10.2979/chiricu.1.2.07 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gómez, Rocío [Google Scholar]
  11. Guerra, Gilbert, and Gilbert Orbea
    2015The argument against the use of the term “Latinx”. The Phoenix. https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2015/11/19/the-argument-against-the-use-of-the-term-latinx/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guidelines for Inclusive Language
  13. Informe de la Real Academia Española sobre el lenguaje inclusivo y cuestiones conexas
    Informe de la Real Academia Española sobre el lenguaje inclusivo y cuestiones conexas 2020https://www.rae.es/sites/default/files/Informe_lenguaje_inclusivo.pdf
  14. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass31: 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, William
    2001Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Limerick, Philip
    2017 “Language contact in the US Southeast: The case of Spanish subject expression in an emerging bilingual community in Georgia.” Spanish in Context14 (1): 53–78. 10.1075/sic.14.1.03lim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.14.1.03lim [Google Scholar]
  17. Langeaux, Milagros Andrea
    2017 “El lenguaje inclusivo y la escritura académica en la universidad.” Actas de Periodismo y Comunicación3: (1). Retrieved from | perio.unlp.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/actas
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lindqvist, Anna, Aurora Renström, Emma, and Gustafsson Sendén, Marie
    2019 “Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies.” Sex Roles811: 109–117. 10.1007/s11199‑018‑0974‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynch, Andrew, and Kim Potowski
    2014 “La valoración del habla bilingüe en los Estados Unidos: Fundamentos sociolingüísticos y pedagógicos en “Hablando bien se entiende la gente.” Hispania91 (1): 32–46. 10.1353/hpn.2014.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2014.0025 [Google Scholar]
  20. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster 2019Merriam-Webster’s Words of the Year 2019. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/word-of-the-year/they
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Michnowicz, Jim, Alex Hyler, James Shepherd, and Sonya Trawick
    2018 “Spanish in North Carolina: English-origin loanwords in a newly forming Hispanic community.” InLanguage Diversity in the New South, ed. byJ. Reaser, E. Wilbanks, W. Wolfram and K. Wojcik, 289–305. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Moure, José Luis
    2020Sobre el lenguaje inclusivo. Una nota del Presidente de la Academia Argentina de Letras. www.aal.edu.ar/?q=node/637/
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Noe-Bustamonte, Luis, Lauren Mora and Mark Lopez
    2020 “About one-in-four U.S. Hispanics have heard of Latinx, but just 3% use it. https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2020/08/11/views-on-latinx-as-a-pan-ethnic-term-for-u-s-hispanics/
  24. Pew Hispanic Center
    Pew Hispanic Center 2014Demographic profile of Hispanics in North Carolina, 2014. www.pewhispanic.org/states/state/nc/ (accessedMay 25, 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Quintero, Paula José
    2019Yo, tú, elle, nosotres, vosotres, elles. El lenguaje inclusivo: ¿tiene algo que ofrecer? Psyciencia. https://www.psyciencia.com/lenguaje-inclusivo-investigaciones/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Reyes, Raul
    2017To be Latinx or not to be Latinx? For some Hispanics that is the question. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/be-latinx-or-not-be-latinx-some-hispanics-question-n817911
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ronquest, Rebecca, Jim Michnowicz, Eric Wilbanks, and Claudia Cortés
    2020 “Examining the (mini-)variable swarm in the Spanish of the Southeast.” InHispanic linguistics: Current issues and new directions, ed. byA. Morales-Front, M. Ferreira, R. Leow and C. Sanz, 303–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.26.15ron
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.15ron [Google Scholar]
  28. Ruiz Mantilla, Jesús
    2019El lenguaje inclusivo tensa a ‘todes’ en Argentina. El País. https://elpais.com/cultura/2019/03/30/actualidad/1553959465_205850.html
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Salinas Jr, Cristobal
    2020 “The Complexity of the “x” in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o Students Relate to, Identify With, and Understand the TermLatinx.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. 10.1177/1538192719900382
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719900382 [Google Scholar]
  30. Salinas Jr, Cristobal, and Adele Lozano
    2017 “Mapping and recontextualizing the evolution of the term Latinx: An environmental scanning in higher education.” Journal of Latinos and Education18: (4). 10.1080/15348431.2017.1390464
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2017.1390464 [Google Scholar]
  31. Scharrón del Rió, María, and Alan Aja
    2015The Case FOR ‘Latinx’: Why Intersectionality Is Not a Choice. https://www.latinorebels.com/2015/12/05/the-case-for-latinx-why-intersectionality-is-not-a-choice/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Steinmetz, Katy
    2019This Is Why Singular ‘They’ Is Such a Controversial Subject. Time. https://time.com/5748649/word-of-year-they-merriam-webster/
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Trudgill, Peter
    1988 “Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect.” En- glish World-Wide9 (1): 33–49. 10.1075/eww.9.1.03tru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.9.1.03tru [Google Scholar]
  34. U. S. Census Bureau
    U. S. Census Bureau (2010) The Hispanic population: 2010. www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf (1 September, 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. U. S. Census Bureau
    U. S. Census Bureau 2019Quick facts: North Carolina. RetrievedMay 25, 2019, fromhttps://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/NC,US/RHI725219
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Herk, Gerard, Paul DeDecker, and Jennifer Thorburn
    2014 “Undergraduate-Conducted Surveys: Balancing Learning and Data Collection.” Methods in DialectologyXV1, 11–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Herk, Gerard
    2008 “The very Big Class Project: Collaborative Language Research in Large Undergraduate Classes.” American Speech83 (2): 222–230. 10.1215/00031283‑2008‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-014 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vidal-Ortiz, Salvador, and Juliana Martínez
    2018 “Latinx thoughts: Latinidad with an X.” Latino Studies16 (3): 384–395. 10.1057/s41276‑018‑0137‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-018-0137-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolfram, Walt, Mary Kohn, and Erin Callahan-Price
    2011 “Southern-bred Hispanic English: An emerging socioethnic variety.” InSelected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. byJ. Michnowicz and R. Dodsworth, 1–13. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zentella, Ana Celia
    2018 “LatinUs* and linguistics Complaints, conflicts, and contradictions – The anthro-political linguistics solution.” InQuestioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry Papers in honor of Ricardo Otheguy, ed. byN. L. Shin and D. Erker, 189–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.76.09zen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.76.09zen [Google Scholar]
  41. Zimman, Lal
    2017 “Transgender language reform: some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language.” Journal of Language and Discrimination1(1): 84–105. 10.1558/jld.33139
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.33139 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00084.mic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00084.mic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): inclusive language; Sociolinguistics; Spanish in the US
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error