Introduction

References

1. Arche, María J., Antonio Fábregas, and Rafael Marín
   2019 The Grammar of Copulas Across Languages, Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198829850.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829850.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Camacho, José
   2015 “What do Spanish copulas have in common with Tibetan evidentials?” InNew Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar, ed. byIsabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina, Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics51, 173–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.5.07cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.07cam [Google Scholar]
3. Cuza, Alejandro, and Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
   2018 “The distribution of copulas ser and estar in Spanish/Catalan bilinguals.” InLanguage Acquisition and Contact in the Iberian Peninsula, ed. byAlejandro Cuza, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, 63–90. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501509988‑004
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501509988-004 [Google Scholar]
4. den Dikken, Marcel, and Teresa O’Neill
   2017 “Copular Constructions in Syntax.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.137
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.137 [Google Scholar]
5. Deo, Ashwini, Sara Sánchez-Alonso, and María Mercedes Piñango
   2017 “Alternative circumstances of evaluation and the ser/estar distinction in Spanish.” Yale University. URLhttps://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003543
6. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria
   2018a “Ser y estar con adjetivos. Afinidad y desajuste de rasgos.” Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística481: 57–114. 10.31810/RSEL.48.3
   https://doi.org/10.31810/RSEL.48.3 [Google Scholar]
7. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria
   2018b “Evidential commitment and feature mismatch in Spanish estar constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics1281: 102–115. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.004 [Google Scholar]
8. Geist, Ljudmila
   2006 “Copular Sentences in Russian vs. Spanish at the Syntax–Semantics Interface.” InProceedings of the Sinn und Bedeutung 10. (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 44), ed. byC. Ebert and C. Endriss, 99–110. 10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.303
   https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.303 [Google Scholar]
9. Guijarro Fuentes, Pedro
   2019 (ed.). Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition, Probus, Special Issue:Volume31, Issue2.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
    2020 “Variación dialectal en las oraciones copulativas en español: los adjetivos de edad y tamaño.” InElementos de variación y diversidad lingüística: qué es una palabra, ed. byEsther Hernández Hernández and Pedro Martín Butragueño, 219–244. CSIC/COLMEX.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
    2021 Ser y estar dentro y fuera del español. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Leonetti, Manuel
    2018 (coord.). Nuevas aportaciones sobre ser y estar, Special issue Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística481, 219–244.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pérez-Jimenez, Isabel, Manuel Leonetti, and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
    2015 (ed.). New perspectives on the study of Ser and estar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5 [Google Scholar]
14. Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel, Silvia Gumiel Molina, and Norberto Moreno Quibén
    2018 “Ser y estar en las lenguas romances ibéricas.” Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística481: 107–151.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Roy, Isabelle
    2013 Non-verbal predication. Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Sánchez-Alonso, Sara, Ashwini Deo, and María Mercedes Piñango
    2019 “Variability in ser/estar Use Across Five Spanish Dialects: An Experimental Investigation.” Ms. Huskins Laboratories, Yale University.
    [Google Scholar]