1887
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since the turn of the 21st century, research on phonation (the production of sound via the vibration of the vocal folds, also known as voice quality) has increased significantly. However, non-modal phonation is highly understudied in Spanish. Therefore, this study comprises a sociophonetic analysis of voice quality in Spanish, examining voice quality categorically from sociolinguistic interview speech conducted with 41 native monolingual Chilean Spanish speakers. The aim of the present paper is to interrogate how phonation varies among residents of Santiago, Chile. Specifically, it asks: what is the sociolinguistic distribution of non-modal voice quality in Chilean Spanish? How does this distribution align with work on voice quality in Spanish and in other languages? Results indicate that non-modal voice quality is used by speakers to mark prosodic boundaries such as phrase finality, aligning with robust cross- linguistic findings. Non-modal phonation is also incorporated when speakers are reporting speech, as well as when they are speaking about emotionally-charged subjects. I draw connections between these findings and those of other dialects of Spanish, and show that utterance-final devoicing, while often associated with “tierras altas” dialects of Spanish, may be more frequent in other dialects than previously indicated. I argue that further examinations of non-modal phonation should also examine third-wave approaches of attitude, emotion, and stance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00109.bol
2024-04-16
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdelli-Beruh, Nassima B., Lesley Wolk, and Dianne Slavin
    2014 “Prevalence of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Male American English Speakers.” Journal of Voice: Official Journal of the Voice Foundation28 (2): 185–90. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acton, Eric K.
    2021 “Pragmatics and the Third Wave: The Social Meaning of Definites.” InSocial Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, ed. byLauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva, 105–26. Cambridge University Press. https://www.emich.edu/english/documents/faculty/pragmatics_and_the_third_wave.pdf. 10.1017/9781108578684.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108578684.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Airas, M., P. Alku, and M. Vainio
    2007 “Laryngeal Voice Quality Changes in Expression of Prominence in Continuous Speech.” InProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Models and Analysis of Vocal Emissions for Biomedical Applications (MAVEBA 2007), 135–38. Florence, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong, Meghan E., Nicholas Henriksen, and Christian DiCanio
    2015 “Sociophonetic Analysis of Young Peninsular Spanish Women’s Voice Quality.” InHispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013, ed. byRachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras, and Elena Valenzuela, 293–312. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ihll.4.15arm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.15arm [Google Scholar]
  5. Ball, Martin, John Esling, and Craig Dickson
    1995 “The VoQS System for the Transcription of Voice Quality.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association25 (2): 71–80. 10.1017/S0025100300005181
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005181 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed- Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blankenship, Barbara
    2002 “The Timing of Nonmodal Phonation in Vowels.” Journal of Phonetics, no.30: 163–91. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0155
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0155 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolyanatz, Mariška, Abril Jiménez, and Isabella Silva DePue
    2024 “Acoustic Correlates of Subtypes of Irony in Chilean Spanish.” Languages9(1): 22–31. 10.3390/languages9010022
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9010022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Browman, Catherine, and Louis Goldstein
    1990 “Tiers in Articulatory Phonology, With Some Implications for Casual Speech.” InPapers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, ed. byJohn Kingston and Mary Beckman, 341–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  11. Catford, John
    1977Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chafe, Wallace
    1993 “Prosodic and Functional Units of Language.” InTalking Data:Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. byJane Edwards and Martin Lampert, 33–44. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chong, Adam J., Megan Risdal, Ann Aly, Jesse Zymet, and Patricia Keating
    2020 “Effects of Consonantal Constrictions on Voice Quality.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America148 (1): EL65–71. 10.1121/10.0001585
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001585 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coupland, Nikolas, and Adam Jaworski
    1997 “Relevance, Accommodation and Conversation: Modeling the Social Dimension of Communication” 16 (2–3): 233–58. 10.1515/mult.1997.16.2‑3.233
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.2-3.233 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crowhurst, Megan J.
    2018 “The Influence of Varying Vowel Phonation and Duration on Rhythmic Grouping Biases among Spanish and English Speakers.” Journal of Phonetics661 (January): 82–99. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dabkowski, Meghan Frances
    2020 “A Sociophonetic Investigation of Mexico City Spanish Vowel Reduction.” InSelected Papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. byIrene Vogel, 93–108. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com/catalog/rllt.16.07dab. 10.1075/rllt.16.07dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.07dab [Google Scholar]
  17. Davidson, Lisa
    2021 “The Versatility of Creaky Phonation: Segmental, Prosodic, and Sociolinguistic Uses in the World’s Languages.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science12 (3): e1547. 10.1002/wcs.1547
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1547 [Google Scholar]
  18. Delforge, Ann Marie
    2008 “Unstressed Vowel Reduction in Andean Spanish.” InSelected Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 107–24. www.lingref.com/cpp/lasp/3/paper1718.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Den, Yasuharu, and Hanae Koiso
    2015 “Factors Affecting Utterance-Final Vowel Devoicing in Spontaneous Japanese.” InProceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed.The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Paper 582.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dilley, L., S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, and M. Ostendorf
    1996 “Glottalization of Word-Initial Vowels as a Function of Prosodic Structure.” Journal of Phonetics24 (4): 423–44. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0023 [Google Scholar]
  21. Du Bois, John
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–82. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. dubois.faculty.linguistics.ucsb.edu/DuBois_2007_Stance_Triangle_M.pdf. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  22. Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolillo
    1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” InTalking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. byJane Edwards, and Martin Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eckert, Penelope
    2012 “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology41 (1): 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2019 “The Limits of Meaning: Social Indexicality, Variation, and the Cline of Inferiority.” Language95 (4): 751–76. 10.1353/lan.2019.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072 [Google Scholar]
  25. Epstein, Melissa A.
    2003a “Voice Quality and Prosody in English.” Doctoral dissertation, UCLA. phonetics.linguistics.ucla.edu/research/mae_diss.pdf
  26. 2003b “Voice Quality and Prosody in English.” InProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. byM. J. Solé, and Daniel Recasens i Vives, 2405–8. Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Esling, John
    1978 “The Identification of Features of Voice Quality in Social Groups.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association8 (1–2): 18. 10.1017/S0025100300001699
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300001699 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2017 “The Laryngeal Articulator’s Influence on Voice Quality and Vowel Quality.” Fattori Sociali e Biologici Nella Variazione Fonetica, no.3: 13–26. 10.17469/O2103AISV000001
    https://doi.org/10.17469/O2103AISV000001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Esposito, Christina
    2003 “Santa Ana Del Valle Zapotec Phonation.” MA Thesis, UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Esposito, Christina, and Sameer ud Dowla Khan
    2020 “The Cross-Linguistic Patterns of Phonation Types.” Language and Linguistics Compass14 (12): e12392. 10.1111/lnc3.12392
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12392 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fant, G., and A. Kruckenberg
    1989 “Preliminaries to the Study of Swedish Prose Reading and Reading Style.” Quarterly Progress and Status Report30 (2): 1–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Garellek, Marc
    2019 “The Phonetics of Voice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Phonetics, ed. byWilliam F. Katz and Peter F. Assmann, 1st ed., 75–106. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. | Series: Routledge handbooks in linguistics: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429056253‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056253-5 [Google Scholar]
  33. Garellek, Marc, and Patricia A. Keating
    2015 “Phrase-Final Creak: Articulation, Acoustics, and Distribution.” Presented at the2015 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland, OR, Portland, Oregon. https://idiom.ucsd.edu/~mgarellek/files/Garellek_Keating_2015_LSA.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gil Fernández, Juana
    2007Fonética Para Profesores de Español: De La Teoría a La Práctica. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gobl, Christer, and Ailbhe Ní Chasaide
    2003 “The Role of Voice Quality in Communicating Emotion, Mood and Attitude.” Speech Communication401: 189–212. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(02)00082‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00082-1 [Google Scholar]
  36. González, Carolina, Christine Weissglass, and Daniel Bates
    2022 “Creaky Voice and Prosodic Boundaries in Spanish: An Acoustic Study.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics15 (1): 33–65. 10.1515/shll‑2022‑2055
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2022-2055 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gordon, Matthew, and Peter Ladefoged
    2001 “Phonation Types: A Cross-Linguistic Overview.” Journal of Phonetics29 (4): 383–406. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0147
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147 [Google Scholar]
  38. Grieser, Jessica A.
    2019 “Investigating Topic-Based Style Shifting in the Classic Sociolinguistic Interview.” American Speech94 (1): 54–71. 10.1215/00031283‑7322011
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-7322011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hall-Lew, Lauren, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva
    2021 “Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theoretical Foundations.” InSocial Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, ed. byLauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore, and Robert Podesva, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108578684.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108578684.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Heinze, Georg, Christine Wallisch, and Daniela Dunkler
    2018 “Variable Selection – A Review and Recommendations for the Practicing Statistician.” Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift60 (3): 431–49. 10.1002/bimj.201700067
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700067 [Google Scholar]
  41. Henton, Caroline, and Anthony Bladon
    1988 “Creak as a Sociophonetic Marker.” InLanguage, Speech, and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, ed. byLarry M. Hyman, and Charles Li, 3–29. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ishi, Carlos Toshinori, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita
    2007 “Acoustic and EGG Analysis of Pressed Phonation.” InProceedings of ICPhS, Saarbrucken.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2010 “Analysis of the Roles and the Dynamics of Breathy and Whispery Voice Qualities in Dialogue Speech.” EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing 2010 (1): 1–12. 10.1155/2010/528193
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/528193 [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson, Keith
    2004 “Massive Reduction in Conversational American English.” InProceedings of the Workshop on Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis, ed. byKiyoko Yoneyama and Kikuchi Maekawa, 29–54. Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jurgec, Peter
    2007 “Creaky Voice in Slovene.” InIII Congreso Internacional de Fonética Experimental, ed. byManuel González González, Elisa Fernández Rei, and Begoña González Rei, 407–20. Santiago de Compostela, Spain. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7804840
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim, Ji Young
    2017 “Voice Quality Transfer in the Production of Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish.” InSelected Papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. bySilvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar, and Adriana Soto-Corominas, 191–207. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11. London, Ontario, Canada: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com/catalog/rllt.11.09kim. 10.1075/rllt.11.09kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.09kim [Google Scholar]
  47. Klatt, Dennis H., and Laura C. Klatt
    1990 “Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Voice Quality Variations among Female and Male Talkers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America87 (2): 820–57. 10.1121/1.398894
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398894 [Google Scholar]
  48. Koenig, Laura, Susanne Fuchs, Annette Gerstenberg, and Moriah Rastegar
    2020 “Formant and Voice Quality Changes as a Function of Age in Women.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America148 (4): 2471–2471. 10.1121/1.5146840
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5146840 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kreiman, Jody, Bruce R. Gerratt, Marc Garellek, Robin Samlan, and Zhaoyan Zhang
    2014 “Toward a Unified Theory of Voice Production and Perception.” Loquens1 (1): e009. 10.3989/loquens.2014.009
    https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.009 [Google Scholar]
  50. Krieman, Jody
    1982 “Perception of Sentence and Paragraph Boundaries in Natural Conversation.” Journal of Phonetics101: 163–75. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30955‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30955-6 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kuang, Jianjing, and Patricia Keating
    2014 “Vocal Fold Vibratory Patterns in Tense versus Lax Phonation Contrasts.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America136 (5): 2784–97. 10.1121/1.4896462
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4896462 [Google Scholar]
  52. Laver, John
    1980The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lehiste, Ilse
    1965 “Juncture.” InProceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 172–200. Münster: S. Karger. tscheer.free.fr/interface/Lehiste%201965%20-%20Juncture.pdf. 10.1159/000426940
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000426940 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lieberman, Philip
    1967Intonation, Perception, and Language. Vol.381. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. McKinnon, Sean
    2018 “A Sociophonetic Analysis of Word-Initial Vowel Glottalization in Monolingual and Bilingual Guatemalan Spanish.” Presented at theHispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Texas, Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    2011 “The Semiotic Hitchhiker’s Guide to Creaky Voice: Circulation and Gendered Hardcore in a Chicana/o Gang Persona: Creaky Voice, Circulation, and Gendered Hardcore in a Chicana/o Gang Persona.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology21 (2): 261–80. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2011.01110.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01110.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Murray, Iain R., and John L. Arnott
    1993 “Toward the Simulation of Emotion in Synthetic Speech: A Review of the Literature on Human Vocal Emotion.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America93 (2): 1097–1108. 10.1121/1.405558
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405558 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe, and Christer Gobl
    2004 “Voice Quality and F0 in Prosody: Towards a Holistic Account.” InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, 189–96. Nara, Japan. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004‑44
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2004-44 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ogden, Richard
    2001 “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association31 (1): 139–52. 10.1017/S0025100301001116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301001116 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ortiz, Héctor, Marcela Fuentes, and Lluïsa Astruc
    2010 “Chilean Spanish Intonation.” InTranscription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, ed. byPilar Prieto and Paolo Roseano, 255–1. LINCOM Studies in Phonetics. Munich: LINCOM Europa. prosodia.upf.edu/home/arxiu/activitats/4th_workshop/protegit/transcription_intonation_spanish_prieto_roseano_lincom.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Podesva, Robert
    2007 “Phonation Type as a Stylistic Variable: The Use of Falsetto in Constructing a Persona.” Journal of Sociolinguistics11 (4): 478–504. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00334.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x [Google Scholar]
  62. 2013 “Gender and the Social Meaning of Non-Modal Phonation Type.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society371: 427–48. 10.3765/bls.v37i1.832
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v37i1.832 [Google Scholar]
  63. Podesva, Robert J., and Patrick Callier
    2015 “Voice Quality and Identity.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics351 (March): 173–94. 10.1017/S0267190514000270
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000270 [Google Scholar]
  64. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2018 “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/
  65. Redi, Laura, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
    2001 “Variation in the Realization of Glottalization in Normal Speakers.” Journal of Phonetics29 (4): 407–29. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0145
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0145 [Google Scholar]
  66. Rogers, Brandon, and Christina Mirisis
    2018 “Voiceless Stop Lenition and Reduction as Social Phenomena in Concepción, Chile.” Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics7 (2): 187–215. 10.7557/1.7.2.4401
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4401 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sadowsky, Scott
    2021 “EMIS: Sistema de estratificación socioeconómica para la investigación lingüística.” InChilean Spanish Linguistics: Studies on variation, innovation, contact, and identity, ed. byBrandon M. A. Rogers and Mauricio A. Figueroa Candia, 367–96. Vernon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Shmueli, Galit
    2010 “To Explain or to Predict?” Statistical Science25 (3). 10.1214/10‑STS330
    https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sicoli, Mark A.
    2010 “Shifting Voices with Participant Roles: Voice Qualities and Speech Registers in Mesoamerica.” Language in Society39 (4): 521–53. 10.1017/S0047404510000436
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000436 [Google Scholar]
  70. Slifka, Janet
    2006 “Some Physiological Correlates to Regular and Irregular Phonation at the End of an Utterance.” Journal of Voice20 (2): 171–86. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  71. Smith, Caroline L.
    2003 “Vowel Devoicing in Contemporary French.” Journal of French Language Studies13 (2): 177–94. 10.1017/S095926950300111X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095926950300111X [Google Scholar]
  72. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd ed.Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  73. Taylor, Sammi, Christopher Dromey, Shawn L. Nissen, Kristine Tanner, Dennis Eggett, and Kim Corbin-Lewis
    2020 “Age-Related Changes in Speech and Voice: Spectral and Cepstral Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR63 (3): 647–60. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR‑19‑00028
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00028 [Google Scholar]
  74. Torreira, Francisco, and Mirjam Ernestus
    2011 “Realization of Voiceless Stops and Vowels in Conversational French and Spanish.” Laboratory Phonology2 (2). 10.1515/labphon.2011.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.012 [Google Scholar]
  75. Trittin, Pamela Jean, and Andrés de Santos y Lleó
    1995 “Voice Quality Analysis of Male and Female Spanish Speakers.” Speech Communication16 (4): 359–68. 10.1016/0167‑6393(95)00004‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(95)00004-8 [Google Scholar]
  76. Trudgill, Peter
    1974The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Wickham, Hadley
    2009 “Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.” R. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98141‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wilce, J. M.
    1997 “Discourse, Power, and the Diagnosis of Weakness: Encountering Practitioners in Bangladesh.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly11 (3): 352–74. 10.1525/maq.1997.11.3.352
    https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1997.11.3.352 [Google Scholar]
  79. Yuasa, I. P.
    2010 “Creaky Voice: A New Feminine Voice Quality for Young Urban-Oriented Upwardly Mobile American Women?” American Speech85 (3): 315–37. 10.1215/00031283‑2010‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-018 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00109.bol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.00109.bol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chilean Spanish; phonation; sociophonetics; voice quality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error