1887
Volume 14, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Study of speech and written texts has provided significant insight regarding linguistic variation and its social correlates. Variation in the or of language, however, remains a relatively understudied phenomenon. With this in mind, we present a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the variation observed in the Linguistic Landscape (LL) of Pilsen, Chicago. A community undergoing perceived processes of gentrification, Pilsen is an active site of economic, sociocultural change as well as newly intensified language contact. To investigate Pilsen’s displayed language variation, we implement a series of logistic regression models that analyze the distribution of both language and contextual framing observed on signs in four key areas in Pilsen. In doing so, we present an informed means with which to understand the sociolinguistic context of Pilsen as a community undergoing change and provide a replicable framework for future study of LLs that experience similar dynamics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.14.3.01lyo
2017-12-30
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, Rowland
    2004 “The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban renaissance?” European Journal of Housing Policy4(1): 107–131. doi: 10.1080/1461671042000215479
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461671042000215479 [Google Scholar]
  2. Backhaus, Peter
    2007Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo, vol.136. Bristol: Multilingual matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker, Valerie & Howard Giles
    2004 “English-only policies: Perceived support and social limitation.” Language & Communication24(1): 77–95. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00030‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00030-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barni, Monica & Massimo Vedovelli
    2012 “Linguistic Landscapes and Language Policies.” InLinguistic Landscapes, multilingualism and social change, ed. by Christine Hélot , Monica Barni , Rudi Janssens , & Carla Bagna , 27–38. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard, Elisabet
    2015 “Opinion: “White People Out of Pilsen” a cry against rising taxes, rent.” Extra: Two Languages, Extra Voz. Retrieved fromhttps://extranews.net
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ben-Rafael, Eliezer , Elana Shohamy , Muhammad Hasan Amara , and Nira Trumper-Hecht
    2006 “Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel.” InLinguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism, ed. by Durk Gorter , 7–30. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Betancur, John
    2011 “Gentrification and Community Fabric in Chicago.” Urban Studies, 48(2): 383–406. doi: 10.1177/0042098009360680
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009360680 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackwood, Robert
    2015 “Ll explorations and methodological challenges: Analysing France’s regional languages.” Linguistic Landscape1(1–2): 38–53. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.1‑2.03bla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.03bla [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucholtz, Mary
    2003 “Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics7(3): 398–416. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00232
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00232 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse studies7(4–5): 585–614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carvalho, Ana M.
    2014 “Sociolinguistic continuities in language contact situations: The case of Portuguese in contact with Spanish along the Uruguayan-Brazilian border.” InPortuguese/Spanish Interfaces, ed. by Patricia Amaral & Ana M.aria Carvalho , 263–294. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, Joe , Bhaskar Karambelkar , and Yihui Xie
    2017 “Create Interactive Web Maps with the JavaScript ‘Leaflet’ Library. R package version 1.1.0.” https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaflet
  13. Cenoz, Jasone & Durk Gorter
    2009 “Language economy and linguistic landscape.” InLinguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, ed. by Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter , 55–69. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cenoz, Jasone & Gorter, Durk
    2006 “Linguistic landscape and minority languages.” International Journal of Multilingualism3(1): 67–80. doi: 10.1080/14790710608668386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386 [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi, Jinny K.
    2004 “La planificación lingüística y la revaloración del guaraní en el Paraguay: Comparación, evaluación e implicación.” Language Problems & Language Planning28: 241–259. doi: 10.1075/lplp.28.3.02cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.28.3.02cho [Google Scholar]
  16. Coupland, Nikolas
    2012 “Bilingualism on display: The framing of Welsh and English in Welsh public spaces.” Language in Society41(01): 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0047404511000893
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000893 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dailey, Rene M. , Howard Giles , and Laura Jansma
    2005 “Language attitudes in an anglo-hispanic context: The role of the linguistic landscape.” Language & Communication25(1): 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2004.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2004.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Edelman, Loulou and Durk Gorter
    2010 “Linguistic Landscapes and the market.” InLanguage and the Market, ed. by Kelly-Holmes & Gerlinde Mautner , 96–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑29692‑3_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29692-3_9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Escobar, Anna María
    2000Contacto social y lingüístico: el español en contacto con el quechua en el Perú. Lima: Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Field, Andy , Jeremy Miles , and Zoë Field
    2012Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Freeman, Lance
    2011There goes the hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Glenn, Ezra Haber
    2016Download, Manipulate, and Present American Community Survey and Decennial Data from the US Census. R package version 2.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=acs
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodman, Steven
    2008 “A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions.” InSeminars in hematology45(3): 135–140. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Granda, Germán de
    1999Español y lenguas indoamericanas en hispanoamérica: estructuras, situaciones y transferencias. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hall, Stuart
    1994 “Cultural Identity and Diaspora. Identity: Community, Culture, Difference.” InColonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: a Reader, ed. by Patrick Williams & Laura Chrisman , 392–401. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hendlin, Yogi , Stacey Anderson , and Stanton Glantz
    2010 “‘Acceptable rebellion’: marketing hipster aesthetics to sell Camel cigarettes in the US.” Tobacco control19(3): 213–222. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032599
    https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.032599 [Google Scholar]
  28. Huebner, Thom
    2009 “A framework for linguistic analysis of linguistic landscapes.” InLinguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, ed. by Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter , 70–87. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hult, Francis M.
    2014 “Drive-thru linguistic landscaping: Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space.” International Journal of Bilingualism18(5): 507–523. doi: 10.1177/1367006913484206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484206 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaworski, Adam & Crispin Thurlow
    2010 “Introducing Semiotic Landscapes.” InSemiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, ed. by Adam Jaworski & Crispin Thurlow , 1–40. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaworski, Adam , & Simone Yeung
    2010 “Life in the Garden of Eden: The naming and imagery of residential Hong Kong.” InLinguistic landscape in the city, ed. by Elana Shohamy , Eliezer Ben-Rafael , and Monica Barni , 153–181. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kahle, David & Hadley Wickham
    . ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal, 5(1), 144–161. URLjournal.r-project.org/archive/2013-1/kahle-wickham.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kallen, Jeffrey
    2010 “Changing landscapes: Language, space and policy in the Dublin Linguistic Landscape.” InSemiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, ed. by Adam Jaworski & Crispin Thurlow 41–58. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Labov, William
    1963 “The social motivation of a sound change.” Word19: 273–309. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2001Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors, vol.2. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Landry, Rodrigue & Bourhis, Richard
    1997 “Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study.” Journal of language and social psychology16(1): 23–49. doi: 10.1177/0261927X970161002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leeman, Jennifer & Gabrielle Modan
    2010 “Selling the city: Language, ethnicity and commodified space.” InLinguistic landscape in the city, ed. by Elana Shohamy , Eliezer Ben-Rafael , and Monica Barni 182–198. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ley, David
    2003 “Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification”. Urban studies40(12): 2527–2544. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000136192
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lou, Jackie J.
    2016The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Otheguy, Ricardo & Zentella Ana Celia
    2012Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737406.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737406.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pons Rodríguez, Lola
    2012El paisaje lingüístico de Sevilla. Sevilla: Diputación de Sevilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Potowski, Kim & Matts, Janine
    2008 “MexiRicans: Interethnic Language and Identity.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education7(2): 137–160. doi: 10.1080/15348450801970688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450801970688 [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2016 “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/.
  44. Scheff, Thomas
    2005 “The Structure of Context: Deciphering Frame Analysis.” Sociological theory23(4): 368–385. doi: 10.1111/j.0735‑2751.2005.00259.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00259.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmich, Mary
    2015, January28. “Pilsen coffee shop becomes target of anti-gentrification.” Chicago Tribune. Retrieved fromwww.chicagotribune.com
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Scollon, Ronald , and Suzanne Scollon
    2003Discourse in place. London / New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  47. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
    1994Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, Neil
    1996The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Spitzer, Leo
    1999 “Back through the future: Nostalgic memory and critical memory in a refuge from Nazism.” InActs of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present, ed. by Bal Mieke , Jonathan Crewe , and Leo Spitzer , 87–104Hanover: University Press of New England.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Spivak, Gayatri
    1988 “Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography.” InSelected Subaltern Studies, ed. by Ranajit Guha & Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak , 3–32. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2015Making Waves: The Story of Variationist Sociolinguistics. Wiley-Blackwell Publishers. doi: 10.1002/9781118455494
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118455494 [Google Scholar]
  53. U.S. Census Bureau
    U.S. Census Bureau 2016, January30. American FactFinder fact sheet: Cook County, I.L.RetrievedJanuary 30, 2016, fromcenstats.census.gov.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Walker, Kyle
    2016 tigris: Load Census TIGER/Line Shapefiles into R. R package version 0.3.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tigris
  55. Wiechmann, Daniel & Arne Lohmann
    2013 “Domain minimization and beyond: Modeling prepositional phrase ordering”. Language Variation and Change, 25(01): 65–88. doi: 10.1017/S0954394512000233
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000233 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilson, David , Jared Wouters and Dennis Grammenos
    2004 “Successful Protect-Community Discourse: Spatiality and Politics in Chicago’s Pilsen Neighborhood.” Environmental Planning36(7): 1173–1190. doi: 10.1068/a36121
    https://doi.org/10.1068/a36121 [Google Scholar]
  57. Woolard, Kathryn
    1998 Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology8(1): 3–29. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sic.14.3.01lyo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.14.3.01lyo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): authenticy , Chicago , frame analysis , gentrification , Linguistic Landscapes and quantitative methods
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error