1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study analyzes mood alternation in Spanish spoken in Georgia among first-generation Mexican immigrants. Using sociolinguistic interview data, tokens of the subjunctive and indicative in dependent clauses were examined, particularly in the following syntactic contexts: and . We argue that mood selection in the contexts under study is determined by the evaluation of the proposition in the dependent clause. We then use this data to inform theories of possible world semantics (i.e., Anand and Hacquard 2013Giannakidou and Mari 2021Villalta 2008) to better understand mood alternation. Moreover, while many U.S. Spanish varieties may demonstrate what Silva-Corvalán (1994, 91) refers to as “a reduced system that made it more difficult to distinguish between more or less possible situations in a hypothetical world,” we show that cases of alternation in the present data still differentiate speaker meaning and evaluation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.20043.bov
2023-02-20
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard
    2013 “Epistemics and attitudes”. Semantics and Pragmatics6.81, pp.1–59. 10.3765/sp.6.8
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, Hilary
    2009 “A sociolinguistic study of sustained Veneto-Spanish bilingualism in Chipilo, Mexico.” Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
  3. Blake, Robert
    1985 “From research to the classroom: notes on the subjunctive.” Hispania681: 166–173. 10.2307/341634
    https://doi.org/10.2307/341634 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bookhammer, Kevin
    2013 “The Variable Grammar of the Spanish Subjunctive in Second- generation Bilinguals in New York City.” Doctoral Dissertation, The City University of New York.
  5. Bove, K.
    (2020) Negation and Veridicality: Mood in Yucatec Spanish. Lingua. 2411:102858. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102858
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102858 [Google Scholar]
  6. DeMello, George
    1995 “Tense and mood after no sé si.” Hispanic Review631: 555–572. 10.2307/474742
    https://doi.org/10.2307/474742 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elizaicín, Adolfo
    2004 “Las fronteras del español con el portugués en América.” Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana41:105–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Farkas, Donka
    1992 “On the semantics of subjunctive complements.” InRomance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory: Selected papers from the XX Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. byPaul Hirschbühler and E. F. K. Koerner, 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.91.07far
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91.07far [Google Scholar]
  9. 2003 “Assertion, Belief and Mood Choice.” presented atESSLLI, Conditional and Unconditional Modality Workshop, Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fernández Ulloa, Teresa
    1996 “Particularidades del castellano del País Vasco.” Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada341:95–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Finanger, Elizabeth
    2011 “Time Reference and Lexical Effects in Mood Choice Following Spanish Epistemic Adverb quizá(s): A Dialectal Comparison.” InSelected Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. byJim Michnowicz and Robin Dodsworth, 90–102. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. García, Christina
    2011 “Distinguishing Two “Synonyms”: A Variationist Analysis of quizá and quizás in Six Spanish Dialects.” InSelected Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. byJim Michnowicz and Robin Dodsworth, 103–112. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Giannakidou, Anastasia
    1998Polarity Sensitivity as (Non) Veridical Dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.23 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 “Evaluative subjunctive as nonveridicality.” InTense, mood, and modality: new answers to old questions, ed. byBlaszack, J. Chicago: CUP. 10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Alda Mari
    2021Truth and Veridicality in Grammar and Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226763484.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226763484.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Granada, Germán
    1979 “Calcos sintácticos del guaraní en el español de Paraguay.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica281: 267–286. 10.24201/nrfh.v28i2.1738
    https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v28i2.1738 [Google Scholar]
  17. Haverkate, Henk
    2002The Synatx, Semantics, and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.96
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.96 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heim, Irene
    1992 “Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs.” Semantics91:183–221. 10.1093/jos/9.3.183
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/9.3.183 [Google Scholar]
  19. Limerick, Philip P.
    2022Corpus of Spanish in Georgia (CSG). Available athttps://corpusofspanishingeorgia.omeka.net
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lunn, Patricia
    1989 “The Spanish subjunctive and relevance.” InStudies in Romance Linguistics, ed. byCarl Kirschner and Janet Decesaris, 249–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.60.16lun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.60.16lun [Google Scholar]
  21. Lynch, Andrew
    1999 “The subjunctive in Miami Cuban Spanish: Bilingualism, contact, and language variability.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  22. Mari, Alda
    2016 “Assertability conditions of epistemic and fictional attitudes and mood variation.” Proceedings of SALT261. 10.3765/salt.v26i0.3782
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3782 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martínez-Mira, M. I.
    2009 “Spanish heritage speakers in the southwest: Factors contributing to the maintenance of the subjunctive in concessive clauses.” Spanish in context6 (1): 105–126. 10.1075/sic.6.1.07mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.6.1.07mar [Google Scholar]
  24. Montrul, Silvina
    2002 “Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition5 (1): 39–68. 10.1017/S1366728902000135
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000135 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2009 “Incomplete acquisition of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish heritage speakers.” The International Journal of Bilingualism13 (2): 239–269. 10.1177/1367006909339816
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339816 [Google Scholar]
  26. Portner, Paul
    2018Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Portner, Paul, and Aynat Rubinstein
    2013 “Mood and contextual commitment.” InSemantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XXII1, ed. byA. Chereches, 461–487. Fort Washington, PA.: CLC Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rooth, Mats
    1985 “Association with Focus.” Doctoral Dissertation. Mass: University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  29. 1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics11: 75–116. 10.1007/BF02342617
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schwenter
    2008 “Epistemic Adverbs and Mood Choice in Three Spanish Dialects.” Paper presented atNew Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 37, Houston: Rice University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
    1994Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Villalta, Elisabeth
    2008 “Mood and gradability: an investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish.” Linguistics and Philosophy311: 467–522. 10.1007/s10988‑008‑9046‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9046-x [Google Scholar]
  33. Viner, Kevin M.
    2018 “The optional Spanish subjunctive mood grammar of New York City heritage bilinguals.” Lingua210–2111: 79–94. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  34. von Fintel, Kai, and Anthony S. Gillies
    2007 “An opinionated guide to epistemic modality.” InOxford Studies in Epistemology 2, ed. byTamar Gendler and John Hawthorne, 32–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Waltermire, Mark
    2014 “The social conditioning of mood variation in the Spanish of Albuquerque, New Mexico.” InThe Influence of English on U.S. Spanish, Issue8 (1) ofSociolinguistic Studies, ed. byMark Waltermire, 111–137. London: Equinox. 10.1558/sols.v8i1.111
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v8i1.111 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2017 “Mood variation after expressions of uncertainty in Spanish.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics10 (2): 349–372. 10.1515/shll‑2017‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0011 [Google Scholar]
  37. Woehr, Richard
    1972 “‘Acaso,’ ‘Quizá(s),’ ‘Tal vez’: Free Variants?” Hispania55 (2): 320–327. 10.2307/338322
    https://doi.org/10.2307/338322 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sic.20043.bov
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.20043.bov
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): mood selection; possible world semantics; U.S. Spanish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error