1887
image of Impersonal expressions in Texas Spanish
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Impersonal expressions in Spanish are expressed in various forms, including use of impersonal or with the indefinite and a third-person verb conjugation. Other forms of expression are becoming more frequent in both monolingual and bilingual contexts (Hurtado 2015; Guirado 2011; Morales 1995). The current study analyzes the forms of impersonal expression in three generations of eighteen total Spanish speakers in Texas. The pragmatic functions of first-person plural and second-person singular forms are analyzed based on their use for generalization, focalized generalization, speaker concealment, or inclusive defocalization (Pulido Astorga and Rivadeneira Valenzuela 2017). Results demonstrate the wide usage of various reference impersonals, signaling deictic extension (Fernández 2008). Furthermore, complementary distribution of forms across discursive function was identified, demonstrating the need for a comprehensive consideration at the discourse-pragmatic level for all reference impersonal forms. This study represents an initial step in the pragmatic consideration of impersonal expressions in US Spanish.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.21028.mil
2025-01-16
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abu-Bader, Soleman H.
    2017Using statistical methods in social science research with a complete SPSS guide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barberà, Gemma, and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
    2017 “Backgrounded agents in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): Passives, middles, or impersonals?” Language (): –. 10.1353/lan.2017.0057
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0057 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, Douglas
    1988Variation across speech and writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
    2003 “Arbitrary readings of 3PL pronominals.” InProceedings of the Conference “sub7-Sinn und Bedeutung”, ed. byMatthias Weisgerber, –. Konstanz, Germany: Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2006 “‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop.” InArguments and Agreement, ed. byPeter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer, and Fred Weerman, –. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Cock, Barbara
    2021 “Intersubjective impersonals in context: A multivariate analysis of Spanish uno and se in spoken language.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernández, Susana
    2008 “Generalizaciones y evidencialidad en español.” Revue Romance, (): –. 10.1075/rro.43.2.04fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.43.2.04fer [Google Scholar]
  8. 2013 “Impersonality in Spanish personal pronouns.” InDeixis and pronouns in Romance languages, ed. byKirsten Jeppersen Kragh, and Jan Lindschouw, –. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.136.06fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.136.06fer [Google Scholar]
  9. Flores-Farrán, Nydia
    2009 “Are you referring to me? The variable use of UNO and YO in oral discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.024 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime
    2008 “Not so impersonal: Intentionality in the use of pronoun uno in contemporary Spanish political discourse.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
    2013La impersonalidad gramatical: Descripción y norma (4th ed.). Madrid: Arco Libros S. L.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guirado, Krístel
    2011 “Uso impersonal de tú y uno en el habla de Caracas y otras ciudades.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hurtado, Luz Marcela
    2015 “El predominio de uno en Bogotá, Colombia: ¿Estrategia para desfocalizar o para subjetivizar?” Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología ():–. 10.19130/iifl.adel.1333
    https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.adel.1333 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ibáñez, Cristina Villalba
    2018 “Primera persona del plural en los juicios orales. Valor representativo y estrategia atenuante.” RILCE: Revista de Filología Hispánica (): –. 10.15581/008.34.3.1056‑80
    https://doi.org/10.15581/008.34.3.1056-80 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer
    1990 “Impersonal uses of personal pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90004‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W [Google Scholar]
  16. Lapidus, Namoi, and Ricardo Otheguy
    2005 “Overt nonspecific Ellos in Spanish in New York.” Spanish in Context (): –. 10.1075/sic.2.2.03lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.2.2.03lap [Google Scholar]
  17. MacDonald, Jonathan
    2017 “An implicit projected argument in Spanish impersonal and passive se constructions.” Syntax (): –. 10.1111/synt.12146
    https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12146 [Google Scholar]
  18. Malchukov, Andrej, and Akio Ogawa
    2011 “Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach.” InImpersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. byAndrej Malchukov, and Anna Siewierksa, –. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.124.02mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.02mal [Google Scholar]
  19. Martínez Caro, Elena
    2003Impersonal uses of personal pronouns in English and Spanish: Evidence from newspaper discourse. 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Madrid, España.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Morales, Ámparo
    1995 “The loss of the Spanish impersonal particle se among bilinguals: A descriptive profile.” InSpanish in the four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism, ed. byCarmen Silva-Corvalán, –. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Moreno, Juan Carlos
    1990 “Impersonal constructions in Spanish.” InWorking with Functional Grammar: Descriptive and Computational Applications, ed. byMike Hannay, and Elseline Vester, –. Providence, RI: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110859904.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859904.31 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ordoñez, Francisco, and Esthela Treviño
    2016 “Agreement and DOM with impersonal se: A comparative study of Mexican and Peninsular Spanish.” InThe Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, ed. byMary Kato and Francisco Ordoñez, –. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Patten, Eileen
    2016 “The nation’s Latino population is defined by its youth.” Pew Research Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Posio, Pekka
    2012 “Who are “we” in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and reference of first person plural subject pronouns.” Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 “You and we: Impersonal second person singular and other referential devices in Spanish sociolinguistic interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  26. Predelli, Stefano
    2004 “The Impersonal ‘you’ and Other Indexicals.” Disputatio ():–. 10.2478/disp‑2004‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2004-0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pulido Astorga, Paulina, and Marcela Rivadeneira Valenzuela
    2017 “En la vida teníh que luchar para salir adelante. Variación pragmático-discursiva y sociolingüística en los usos no deícticos de la segunda persona del singular en el español de Chile.” Onomázein: Revista de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción (): –. 10.7764/onomazein.37.03
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.37.03 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ramírez, Dora
    2007 “Subject Personal Pronouns and Impersonal Sentences in Adult Colombian Immigrants’ Spanish.” InSelected Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. byJonathan Holmquist, Augusto Lorenzino, and Lotfi Sayhai, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Raposo, Eduardo, and Juan Uriagereka
    1996 “Indefinite Se.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (): –. 10.1007/BF00133363
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133363 [Google Scholar]
  30. Serrano, María José
    2013 “El pronombre tú como recurso objetivador en español: Variación textual y discursiva.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics ():–. 10.7557/1.2.1.2519
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.1.2519 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2021 “Gradual objectivity. Variation in the use of objectivizing second-person singular tú in Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.029 [Google Scholar]
  32. Siewierska, Anna
    2008 “Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies.” InCurrent Trends in Contrastive Linguistics, ed. byMaría de los Ángeles Gómez-González, Lachlan Mackenzie, and Elsa González Alvárez, –. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie [Google Scholar]
  33. 2011 “Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. Third-person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe.” InImpersonal Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. byAndrej Malchukov, and Anna Siewierksa, –. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.124.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie [Google Scholar]
  34. Siewierska, Anna, and Maria Papastahi
    2011 “Towards a typology of third person plural impersonals.” Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/ling.2011.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018 [Google Scholar]
  35. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
    1994Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198242871.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198242871.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen, and Andrés Enrique-Arias
    2017Sociolingüística y pragmática del español (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Speshilova, Yulia, and Nikolett F. Gulyás
    2014 “Impersonals and passives in contemporary Udmurt.” Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Suñer, Margarita
    1976 “Demythologizing the impersonal “se” in Spanish.” Hispania (): –. 10.2307/339502
    https://doi.org/10.2307/339502 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2006 “The Sociolinguistic Interview.” InAnalysing Sociolinguistic Variation, Sali Tagliamonte, –. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Vila, María Rosa
    1987 “La segunda persona gramatical en función no deíctica.” Revista Española de Lingüística(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zobel, Sarah
    2016 “On the (in)definiteness of impersonal pronouns.” Linguistica (Ljubljana) ():–. 10.4312/linguistica.56.1.363‑374
    https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.56.1.363-374 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.21028.mil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.21028.mil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: US Spanish ; impersonality ; pragmatics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error