Patrones y funciones discursivas de seis encapsuladores nominales en español en la escritura académica de estudiantes universitarios

References

1. Adelstein, Andreína, y Victoria de los Ángeles Boschiroli
   2015 “Estatuto terminológico de nombres abstractos meronímicos de referencia general: descripción y propuesta de representación en diccionarios para la producción académica.” Debate Terminológico141: 30–24.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anthony, Laurence
   2022 AntConc Software Version 4.1.1. Tokyo: Waseda University.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Angel, y Paul Thompson
   2015 “Shell-nounhood in academic discourse. A critical state-of-the-art review.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics20 (3): 378–404. 10.1075/ijcl.20.3.05ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.3.05ben [Google Scholar]
4. Duque, Eladio
   2021 “Etiquetas de discurso en la enseñanza de español como lengua extranjera.” EnInternacionalización y enseñanza del español como LE/L2: plurilingüismo y educación intercultural, ed. porMarta Saracho-Arnáiz, y Herminda Otero-Duval, 854–873. Asociación de Español como Lengua Extranjera (ASELE).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Flowerdew, John
   2003 “Signalling nouns in discourse.” English for Specific Purposes22 (4): 329–346. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00017‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00017-0 [Google Scholar]
6. Flowerdew, John, y Richard W. Forest
   2015 Signalling nouns in English. A corpus-based discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135405
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135405 [Google Scholar]
7. Francis, Gill
   1994 “Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion.” EnAdvances in Written Text Analysis, ed. porMalcolm Coulthard, 83–101. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, y Magali Paquot
   2008 “Too chatty. Learner academic writing and register variation.” English Text Construction1 (1): 41–61. 10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
9. Halliday, M. A. K., y Ruqaiya Hasan
   1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hoey, Michael
    1993 “A common signal in discourse: how the word reason is used in texts.” EnTechniques of Description. Spoken and written discourse, ed. porJohn M. Sinclair, Michael Hoey, y Gwyneth Fox, 67–82. Abingdon, New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hyland, Ken
    2012 “Bundles in academic discourse.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics321: 150–169. 10.1017/S0267190512000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037 [Google Scholar]
13. Hyland, Ken
    2017 “Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?” Journal of Pragmatics1131: 16–29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 [Google Scholar]
14. Ignatieva, Natalia, y Cecilia Colombi
    (eds.) 2014 CLAE: Corpus del Lenguaje Académico del Español de México y los Estados Unidos: Un análisis sistémico funcional. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jiang, Feng (Kevin) y Hyland, Ken
    2018 “Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse.” Applied Linguistics39 (4): 508–531. 10.1093/applin/amw023
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw023 [Google Scholar]
16. López-Ferrero, Carmen
    2012 “Lexical connection: Semiterm grammatical patterns in Spanish.” Applied Linguistics33 (4): 428–449. 10.1093/applin/ams018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams018 [Google Scholar]
17. López Samaniego, Anna
    2011 La categorización de entidades del discurso en la escritura profesional. Las etiquetas discursivas como mecanismo de cohesión léxica. Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa. Universitat de Barcelona. hdl.hyle.net/10803/48757
    [Google Scholar]
18. López Samaniego, Anna
    2018 “La encapsulación nominal en el discurso académico-científico oral y escrito: patrones de aparición.” Caplletra. Revista Internacional de Filología641: 129–152. 10.7203/caplletra.64.11369
    https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.64.11369 [Google Scholar]
19. McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard y Tono, Yukio
    2006 Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London y New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. McEnery, Tony y Hardie, Andrew
    2012 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2000 English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: from corpus to cognition. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
22. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2018 “Shell nouns in English: a personal roundup.” Caplletra641: 109–128. 10.7203/caplletra.64.11368
    https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.64.11368 [Google Scholar]
23. Sinclair, John M.
    1993 “Written discourse structure.” EnTechniques of Description. Spoken and written discourse, ed. porJohn M. Sinclair, Michael Hoey, y Gwyneth Fox, 6–31. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Urizar Ocampo, Carolina, e Ignacio Rodríguez Sánchez
    2022 “Encapsuladores nominales hecho, tema, idea y problema en un corpus de escritura académica en español.” Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 40 (74): 153–191. 10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2022.74.1010
    https://doi.org/10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2022.74.1010 [Google Scholar]
25. Winter, Eugene
    1977 “A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse.” Instructional Science, 61: 1–92. 10.1007/BF00125597
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125597 [Google Scholar]
26. Wray, Alison
    2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]