1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Spanish in Context
  4. Volume 23, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1571-0718
  • E-ISSN: 1571-0726
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines how the distribution of two common Mexican Spanish slang phrases — “no mames” (no shit) and “no manches” (no way) — is related to the gender of the speaker. We use data from Twitter and self-report surveys. We find that both men and women use “no mames” (perceived as vulgar) more than “no manches” (non-vulgar) overall on Twitter, but women use “no manches” more frequently than men. Speaker intuitions regarding the use of the phrases in face-to-face interactions provide evidence that many speakers might be unaware of the gendered distribution of the phrases as seen online. This study contributes to our understanding of slang, context, and gendered variation in everyday social life, showing that gender is a relevant factor in slang usage in an online context despite speakers being seemingly unaware of how gender conditions slang usage in everyday social interactions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
2026-08-20
2026-09-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babel, Anna. M.
    2014 “Stereotypes versus experience: Indexing regional identity in Bolivian Valley Spanish.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (5): 604–633. 10.1111/josl.12101
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul
    2014 Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamman, David, Eisenstein, Jacob, and Schnoebelen, Tyler
    2014 “Gender identity and lexical variation in social media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (2): 135–160. 10.1111/josl.12080
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080 [Google Scholar]
  4. boyd, danah
    2014 It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucholtz, Mary, and Hall, Kira
    2008 “All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12 (4): 401–431. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00382.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00382.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bucholtz, Mary
    2009 “From Stance to Style: Gender, Interaction, and Indexicality in Mexican Immigrant Youth Slang.” InJaffe, A. M. (Ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 146–170. New York: Oxford University Press. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kg5m8kb. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cummings, Laura L.
    2003 “Cloth-Wrapped People, Trouble, and Power: Pachuco Culture in the Greater Southwest.” Journal of the Southwest, 45 (3): 329–348.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. de Klerk, Vivian
    1990 “Slang: A male domain?” Sex Roles, 22 (9–10): 589–606. 10.1007/BF00288237
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288237 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckert, Penelope
    2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12 (4): 453–476. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  10. 2012 “Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 411: 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenstein, Jacob
    2015 “Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19 (2): 161–188. 10.1111/josl.12119
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12119 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2017 “Identifying Regional Dialects in Online Social Media.” InC. Boberg, J. Nerbonne, and D. Watt (Eds.), The Handbook of Dialectology, 11: 368–383. Wiley. 10.1002/9781118827628.ch21
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118827628.ch21 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gauthier, Michael
    2021 “‘Eww Wtf, What a Dumb Bitch’: A Case Study of Similitudes inside Gender-Specific Swearing Patterns on Twitter.” Corpora16 (1) (April 2021): 31–61. 10.3366/cor.2021.0208
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2021.0208 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gauthier, Michael, and Adrien Guille
    2017 “Gender and Age Differences in Swearing: A Corpus Study of Twitter.” InKristy Beers Fägersten and Karyn Stapleton (Eds.), Advances in Swearing Research: New languages and new contexts, 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.282.07gau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.282.07gau [Google Scholar]
  15. Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini, and Diansheng Guo
    2018 “Mapping Lexical Innovation on American Social Media.” Journal of English Linguistics, 46 (4): 293–319. 10.1177/0075424218793191
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424218793191 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haddican, Bill, and Daniel Erza Johnson
    2012 Effects on the Particle Verb Alternation across English Dialects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 18 (2): 31–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Honnibal, Matthew, and Mark Johnson
    2015 “An Improved Non-monotonic Transition System for Dependency Parsing.” Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1373–1378. 10.18653/v1/D15‑1162
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1162 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, Yuan, Diansheng Guo, Alice Kasakoff, and Jack Grieve
    2016 “Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 591: 244–255. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hughes, Susan E.
    1992 “Expletives of Lower Working-Class Women.” Language in Society, 21 (2). 10.1017/S004740450001530X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001530X [Google Scholar]
  20. Ilbury, Christian
    2020 “‘Sassy Queens’: Stylistic orthographic variation in Twitter and the enregisterment of AAVE.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24 (2): 245–264. 10.1111/josl.12366
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12366 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis: Mixed-effects variable rule analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (1): 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Joinson, Adam
    1999 “Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31 (3): 433–438. 10.3758/BF03200723
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, Taylor
    2015 “Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using ‘Black Twitter.’” American Speech, 90 (4): 403–440. 10.1215/00031283‑3442117
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3442117 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kiesling, Scott Fabius
    2004 Dude. American Speech, 79 (3): 281–305. 10.1215/00031283‑79‑3‑281
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kapron-King, Anna, and Yang Xu
    2021 A diachronic evaluation of gender asymmetry in euphemism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.02083. 10.18653/v1/2021.lchange‑1.5
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.lchange-1.5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic patterns. U. Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Labov, Teresa
    1992 “Social and Language Boundaries among Adolescents.” American Speech, 67 (4): 339. 10.2307/455845
     https://doi.org/10.2307/455845 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lopez, Jaime
    1996 Chilanga Banda. Recorded by Cafe Tacvba on “Avalancha de éxitos” [Compact Disc]. Mexico: Warner Music.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Macaulay RKS
    Macaulay RKS 1977 Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Univ. Edinb. Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    2008 Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470693728
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693728 [Google Scholar]
  31. Murray, Thomas E.
    2012 “Swearing as a function of gender in the language of midwestern American college students.” InL. F. Monaghan and J. E. Goodman (Eds) A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings, 233–41. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Nelsen, Edward A., and Edward Rosenbaum
    1972 “Language Patterns Within the Youth Subculture: Development of Slang Vocabularies.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 18 (3): 273–285.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman, and James W. Pennebaker
    2008 “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes, 45 (3): 211–236. 10.1080/01638530802073712
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ortega, Adolfo
    1991 Caló orbis: Semiotic aspects of a Chicano language variety. P. Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Palacios, Niktelol
    2002 “Algunos marcadores discursivos característicos del habla de los adolescentes mexicanos.” Iztapalapa: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23 (53): 225–247.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramírez-Cruz, Héctor
    2017 “¡No manches, güey! Service encounters in a Hispanic American intercultural communication setting.” Journal of Pragmatics, 1081: 28–47. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rao, Delip, David Yarowsky, Abhishek Shreevats, and Manaswi Gupta
    2010 “Classifying latent user attributes in twitter.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents — SMUC ’10, 37. 10.1145/1871985.1871993
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1871985.1871993 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roth-Gordon, Jennifer
    2007 “Youth, slang, and pragmatic expressions: Examples from Brazilian Portuguese.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11 (3): 322–345. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00326.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00326.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, Aaron, and Joanna Brenner
    2013 “72% of Online Adults are Social Networking Site Users.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/08/05/72-of-online-adults-are-social-networking-site-users/
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2006 Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Bridget L. Jankowski
    2019 “Golly, gosh, and oh my god! What North American dialects can tell us about swear words.” American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage, 94 (2): 195–222. 10.1215/00031283‑7251241
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-7251241 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thelwall, Mike
    2008 “Fk yea I swear: cursing and gender in MySpace.” Corpora3 (1): 83–107. 10.3366/E1749503208000087
     https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000087 [Google Scholar]
  43. Trudgill, Peter
    1972 “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.” Lang. Soc. 11:179–95. 10.1017/S0047404500000488
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, Wenbo, Lu Chen, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, and Amit P. Sheth
    2014 ‘Cursing in English on Twitter’, Proceedings of the17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 415–25. ACM. Baltimore, Maryland, USA. February 2017. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/2531602.2531734
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531734 [Google Scholar]
  45. Waseem, Zeerak, and Dirk Hovy
    2016 “Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter.” InProceedings of the NAACL Student Research Workshop, 88–93, San Diego, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wolfram, Walter A.
    1969 A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Cent. Appl. Ling.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Zentella, Anna Celia
    2017 “‘Dime con quién hablas, y te diré quién eres’: Linguistic (In)security and Latina/o Unity.” InJ. Flores and R. Rosaldo (Eds.), A Companion to Latina/o Studies, 25–38. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781405177603.ch3
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405177603.ch3 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
Loading
Gendered variation in Mexican slang
Spanish in Context 23, 213 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.23011.sie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gender; Mexican Spanish; slang; surveys; Twitter

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error