1887
image of Mexican terms of address
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In everyday interaction, interlocutors normally want to be socially seen in the best possible light and polite behavior will often involve elevating the status of the addressee(s) through expressions of respect, deference and social closeness/distance. In Mexican Spanish this can be seen through the use of the / address forms, the use of formal titles and formal/informal grammatical and lexical structures. Focusing on address forms, we reject simplified and streamlined explanations and explore the use of interpersonal and transactional power as a major determinant of address forms. To understand this, we examine the correlation between relational power and address forms as expressed through hierarchical norms, co-constructed relationships and oppositional behavior. In examining the Mexican context, we examine how young middle-class interactants assess, re-evaluate and often restructure conventional practices by comparing and contrasting politeness beliefs, values and attitudes and use other adult groups as a point of comparison.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25003.mug
2026-05-11
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arundale, Robert
    2020Communicating and relating: Constituting face in everyday interacting. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190210199.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190210199.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayraktaroğlu, Arn
    1991 “Politeness and interactional imbalance.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language: –. 10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2001 “Advice-giving in Turkish: ‘Superiority’ or ‘solidarity’?” InBayraktaroğlu, Arin and Maria Sifianou (eds.). Linguistic politeness across boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.88.08bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.88.08bay [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
    1960 “The pronouns of power and solidarity.” InSebeok, Thomas (ed,). Style in language, –. MIT Press and New York/London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Canagarajah, Suresh
    1999Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carricaburo, Norma
    2015Las fórmulas de tratamiento en el español actual. Madrid: Arco / Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulmas, Florian
    2013Sociolinguistics: The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139794732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139794732 [Google Scholar]
  9. Covarrubias, Patricia
    1999 Pronominally speaking: Mexican enactments of ‘tú’ and ‘usted’ as Interpersonal Components of Organizational Networks of Cooperation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: University of Washington.
  10. Curcó, Carmen
    2007 “Positive ace, group face, and affiliation: An overview of politeness studies on Mexican Spanish.” InPlacencia, María Elena and Carmen Garcia (eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish-Speaking world, –. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dumitrescu, Domnita, and Patricia Lorena Andueza
    2018L2 Spanish pragmatics: From research to teaching. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315276182
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276182 [Google Scholar]
  12. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    2008Politeness in Mexico and the United States: A Contrastive Study of the Realization and Perception of Refusals. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.171
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.171 [Google Scholar]
  13. France, Peter
    1992Politeness and its discontents: Problems in French classical culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551451
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551451 [Google Scholar]
  14. Giroux, Henry A.
    1983Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interactional ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Double Day Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness.” Multilingua (): –. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kádár, Daniel Z.
    2017Politeness, im/politeness and ritual: Maintaining the moral order in interpersonal interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding im/politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim Lee, Uh Sung
    1989El uso de tú y usted en el español de la ciudad de México. Tesis de maestría. UNAM, México.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kluge, Bettina
    2020 “Las formas de tratamiento pronominal.” InPlacencia, María Elena and Xose A. Padilla (Eds.), Guía Práctica de Pragmática del Español, –. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lastra de Suárez, Yolanda
    1972 “Los pronombres de tratamiento en la Ciudad de Mexico.” Anuario de Letras: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Locher, Miriam and Richard Watts
    2005Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Miquel I. Verges, María. E.
    1963 “Fórmulas de tratamiento en la ciudad de México.” Anuario de Letras: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mugford, Gerrard
    2020 “Mexican politeness: an empirical study on the reasons underlying/motivating practices to construct local interpersonal relationships.” Russian Journal of Linguistics (): –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2020‑24‑1‑31‑55
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-31-55 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mugford, G. and María Luisa Arias Moreno
    2017 “La refutación de la percepción de descortesía en los adultos jóvenes: la detección de prácticas interpersonales de tú/usted en México.” Discurso & Sociedad (): –. 10.14198/dissoc.11.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.14198/dissoc.11.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mugford, Gerrard, and J. César Félix-Brasdefer
    2021 “Politeness research in the Spanish -speaking world.” InKoike, Dale A. and Félix-Brasdefer, J. César (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics, –. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mugford, Gerrard, and Nadia Valenzuela
    2024 “Mexican politeness: Younger generations question conventional cultural behaviour.” Lenguas en Contexto (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nowikow, Wiaczeslaw
    2010 “Sobre los motivos del empleo de “tú” y “usted” de estudiantes universitarios en Guadalajara (Jalisco, México) desde la perspectiva de los enfoques socio y etnológico-lingüisticos.” InHummel, Martin, Bettina Kluge y Maria Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, –. México D.F., El Colegio de México y Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Orozco, Leonor
    2006 “No me hable de despectivo, hábleme de correcto.” InMartín Butragueño, Pedro (ed.), Lideres Lingüístico, –. México: El Colegio de México.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2009 “La extensión del tuteo en la ciudad de Guadalajara (México).” InHummel, Martin, Bettina Kluge, y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, –. México D.F., El Colegio de México y Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2010 Estudio sociolingüístico de la cortesía en tratamientos y peticiones. Datos de Guadalajara. PhD Dissertation. México: El Colegio de México.
  32. Schneider, Klaus P., and María Elena Placencia
    2017 “Im)politeness and regional variation.” InCulpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár (eds.), Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, –. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_21
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_21 [Google Scholar]
  33. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2008Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwenter, Scott A.
    1993 “Diferenciación dialectal por medio de pronombres: el uso de tú y usted en España y México.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, –. 10.24201/nrfh.v41i1.926
    https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v41i1.926 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vázquez Laslop, María Eugenia, and Leonor Orozco
    2009 “Formas de tratamiento del español en Mexico.” InHummel, Martin, Bettina Kluge y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, –. México D.F., El Colegio de México y Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25003.mug
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25003.mug
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: T/V address forms ; change ; power
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error