1887
image of Spanish dialectal differences in L2 English
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates how native Spanish speakers of eight different dialects (Argentinian, Chilean, Colombian, Ecuadorean, Mexican, Peninsular, Peruvian and Venezuelan) communicate in non-native English (E2) in online contexts. Using Natural Language Processing (NLP), the study identifies residual features of these dialects in online language exchange forums. A qualitative interpretation of the findings reveals variations in E2 request speech acts across the dialects. The results suggest that culturally bound linguistic features influence E2 communication, with differences observed in how speakers from different dialects open, develop, and close interactions. Lexical choices, particularly verbs in request head acts, also differentiate the dialects. The study enhances understanding of L2 English pragmatics, sociolinguistic variation, and NDID by applying NLP to a large dataset of E2 data from native Spanish speakers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25005.moj
2026-05-11
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, Lawrence
    2022AntConc (Version 4.0.5) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Beverly S. Hartford
    1993 “Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition: –. 10.1017/S0272263100012122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012122 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. New York: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
    2024Corpus approaches to social media discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bykh, Serhiy, Sowmya Vajjala, Julia Krivanek, and Detmar Meurers
    2013 “Combining shallow and linguistically motivated features in Native Language Identification.” NAACL / HLT 2013 Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, –. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cestero Mancera, Ana María, and Marta Albelda Marco
    2020 “Variationist study of mitigation I: Towards a description of dialectal and sociolectal patterns of mitigation in Spanish.” Revista Signos (): –. 10.4067/S0718‑09342020000300935
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342020000300935 [Google Scholar]
  8. Curcó, Carmen
    1998 “¿No me harías un favorcito?: Reflexiones en torno a la expresión de la cortesía verbal en el español de México y el español peninsular.” InLa pragmática lingüística del español: Recientes desarrollos, ed. byHenk Haverkate, Gjis Mulder and Caroline Fraile Maldonado, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004655645_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004655645_007 [Google Scholar]
  9. Curcó, Carmen, and Anna de Fina
    2002 “Modo imperativo, negación y diminutivos en la expresión de la cortesía en español: el contraste entre México y España.” InActos de habla y cortesía en español, ed. byMaría Elena Placencia and Diana Bravo, –. München: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Delgado, Vilma L.
    1994 Politeness in Language: Directive speech acts in U.S. English, and Colombian and Castilian Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  11. DiBartolomeo, Megan
    2021 “Pragmalinguistic variation in L2 Spanish e-mail requests: Learner strategies and instructor perceptions.” InNew Directions in Second Language Pragmatics, ed. byCésar Félix-Brasdefer and Rachel Shively, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110721775‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110721775-015 [Google Scholar]
  12. Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
    2018 “‘Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly’: Address forms, directness and degree of imposition in L2 emails.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Færch, Claus, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989 “Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization.” InCross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, ed. byShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, –. New York: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Félix-Brasdefer, César
    2005 “Indirectness and politeness in Mexican requests.” Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (Vol.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Félix-Brasdefer, César
    2012 “E-mail requests to faculty.” InInterlanguage request modification, ed. byMaria Economidou-Kogetsidis and Helen Woodfield, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.217.04fel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.217.04fel [Google Scholar]
  16. García, Carmen
    1993 “Making a request and responding to it: A case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90085‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90085-4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldin, Gili, Ella Rabinovich, and Shuly Wintner
    2018 “Native language identification with user generated content.” Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, –. Brussels: Association for Computational Linguistics. URL: https://aclanthology.org/D18-1000.pdf. 10.18653/v1/D18‑1395
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1395 [Google Scholar]
  18. González Carvajal, Santiago, and Eduardo Garrido Merchán
    2020 “Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classification.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.13012.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gries, Stefan T.
    2003 “Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: –. 10.1075/arcl.1.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.1.02gri [Google Scholar]
  20. Herring, Susan, and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-mediated discourse 2.0.” InThe handbook of discourse analysis 2, ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, Xiao, Yufan Guo, Jeroen Geertzen, Dora Alexopoulou, Lin Sun, and Anna Korhonen
    2014 “Native Language Identification Using Large, Longitudinal Data.” InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), –. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Joulin, Armand, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, and Tomas Mikolov
    2016 “Bag of tricks for efficient text classification.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01759.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kingston, Julia
    2019 Other Language Influence of Metropolitan, Canadian, and Maghrebi French in Colloquial Written English. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Koppel, Moshe, Jonathan Schler, and Kfir Zigdon
    2005 “Automatically determining an anonymous author’s native language.” InIntelligence and Security Informatics: IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, ed. byPaul Kantor, Gheorghe Muresan, Fred Roberts, Daniel D. Zeng, Fei-Yue Wang, Hsinchun Chen, and Ralph C. Merkle, –. London: Springer. 10.1007/11427995_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/11427995_17 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kredens, Krzysztof, Ria Perkins, and Tim Grant
    2019 “Developing a framework for the explanation of interlingual features for native and other language influence detection.” Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito (): –. 10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/6_2a2
    https://doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/6_2a2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, Cynthia
    2004 “Written requests in e-mails sent by adult Chinese learners of English.” Language, Culture, and Curriculum (): –. 10.1080/07908310408666682
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310408666682 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lipski, John
    2012 “Geographical and social varieties of Spanish: An overview.” InThe handbook of Hispanic linguistics, ed. byJosé Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, and Erin O’Rourke, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118228098.ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Márquez Reiter, Rosina
    2002 “A contrastive study of conventional indirectness in Spanish: Evidence from Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Márquez Reiter, Rosina, and María Elena Placencia
    2004 “Displaying closeness and respectful distance in Montevidean and Quiteño service encounters.” InCurrent Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. byRosina Márquez Reiter and María Elena Placencia, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.13mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.13mar [Google Scholar]
  30. Mojedano Batel, Andrea, Mitchell Adams, and Piotr Pezik
    2022 “Native Dialect Influence Detection (NDID): Differentiating between Mexican and Peninsular L1 Spanish in L2 English.” Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito (): –. 10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/9_1a6
    https://doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/9_1a6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nicolai, Garrett, Bradley Hauer, Mohammad Salameh, Lei Yao, and Grzegorz Kondrak
    2013 “Cognate and mis-spelling features for natural language identification.” InProceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ogiermann, Eva
    2009On Apologizing in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.191
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191 [Google Scholar]
  33. Placencia, María Elena
    2005 “Pragmatic variation in corner store interactions in Quito and Madrid.” Hispania (): –. 10.2307/20063161
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063161 [Google Scholar]
  34. Puga Larraín, Juana
    1997La atenuación en el castellano de Chile: un enfoque pragmalingüístico. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1999 “Elusión e insinuación: la atenuación en el castellano de Chile.” RLA Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rangel, Francisco, Marc Franco-Salvador, and Paolo Rosso
    2016 “A low dimensionality representation for language variety identification.” InInternational Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, –. London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ribeiro, Marco Tulio, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin
    (2016) “‘Why Should I Trust You?’: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier.” arXiv:1602.04938. 10.1145/2939672.2939778
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rock, Frances
    2001 “The Genesis of a Witness Statement.” Forensic Linguistics (now The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law) (): –. 10.1558/sll.2001.8.2.44
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2001.8.2.44 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stukker, Ninke, and Ted Sanders
    2012 “Subjectivity and prototype structure in causal connectives: A cross-linguistic perspective.” Journal of pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tawalbeh, Ayman, and Emran Al-Oqaily
    2012 “In-directness and Politeness in American English and Saudi Arabic Requests: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” Asian Social Science (): –. 10.5539/ass.v8n10p85
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p85 [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomason, Sandra
    2001Language Contact: An Introduction. Georgetown, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyler, Andrea, Charles M. Mueller, and Vu Ho
    2010 “Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals.” AILA Review: –. 10.1075/aila.23.03tyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl [Google Scholar]
  43. Wierzbicka, Anna
    2003Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Second edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220964
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220964 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wolfe-Quintero, Kathryn Elizabeth, Shunji Inagaki, and Hae-Young Kim
    1998Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wydmuch, Marek, Kalina Jasinska, Mikhail Kuznetsov, Róbert Busa-Fekete, and Krzysztof Dembczynski
    (2018) “A no-regret generalization of hierarchical softmax to extreme multi-label classification.” Advances in neural information processing systems.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25005.moj
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25005.moj
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: computer-mediated communication ; L2 English ; requests
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error