1887
image of “Decorative” morphology in Spanish
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Human languages are hypothesized to be adapted to the functions they fulfill. Specifically, their structure has been claimed to be optimized for efficient communication and easy learning. Nonetheless, languages also exhibit many “extravagant” features, with no clear role in information transfer or language acquisition. Building on typological research on this topic, in this paper we present evidence that varieties of Spanish (colloquial mostly) feature the type of “decorative” morphology found in some world languages. We provide a detailed characterization of such morphology and further hypothesize some potential functions for it. We conclude by advocating for a sociopragmatics approach to intralinguistic variation that also considers the findings by language typology, but likewise for a typological approach to language diversity that pays attention to the findings by variationist sociolinguistics. Ultimately, our study argues for a unitary view of linguistic variation and for considering functions like aesthetics or play when explaining the design features of language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25010.ben
2025-11-11
2025-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguilar Ruiz, Manuel José
    2012 “Neologismos fraseológicos como palabras diacríticas en las locuciones en español.” Paremia: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcedo, María., Benítez-Burraco, Antonio., and Marqueta, Bárbara
    2025Estudio piloto de los familectos en español: optimización metodológica e implicacione para el análisis de la variación sociolingüística. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/arvqk_v1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso, Amado
    1974 “Noción, emoción, acción y fantasía en los diminutivos.” Estudios lingüísticos. Temas españoles–. Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ambadiang, Téophile
    1999 “La flexión nominal. Género y número.” InBosque, Ignacio, and Demonte. Violeta (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología–. Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambadiang, Téophile, and Camus, Bruno
    2013 “Aspectos del desarrollo histórico de la alomorfía del diminutivo en español. Formación de palabras y diacronía.” Anexo 19 deRevista de Lexicografía–.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Annunziata, Ciro
    2019 “El uso del expletivo ‘puto, -a’ en la lengua española contemporánea” (Master dissertation, Universidad de Oviedo 2019) hdl.handle.net/10651/59451
  7. Aronoff, Mark, and Repetti, Lori
    2022 “Conditioned epenthesis in romance.” InPeriphrasis and inflection in diachrony: A view from romance–. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198870807.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870807.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumann, Andreas , and Mühlenbernd, Roland
    2022 “Less of the same: Modeling horror aequi and extravagance as mechanisms of negative frequency dependence in linguistic diversification.” InThe Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Language Evolution–. Joint Conference on Language Evolution (JCoLE).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Hartmann, Stefan, and Pleyer, Michael
    2025 “The role of play in language structure, acquisition, and evolution”. Language and Linguistic Compass(): e70021. 10.1111/lnc3.70021
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.70021 [Google Scholar]
  10. Benítez-Burraco, Antonio
    . March5 2025Familects: the origin of everything. 10.31234/osf.io/8uqeh_v1
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8uqeh_v1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benítez González, Grecia Isabel
    2024 “Un reanálisis del sufijo -ístico desde la solidaridad morfológica.” Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, e282. 10.24201/clecm.v11i00.282
    https://doi.org/10.24201/clecm.v11i00.282 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bajo Pérez, Elena
    2021 “El masculino despectivo o desmerecedor.” Moenia: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Booij, Geert
    2005 “Construction-Dependent Morphology.” Lingue e linguaggio (): –. 10.1418/20719
    https://doi.org/10.1418/20719 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carrera de la Red, Micaela
    2002 “Prefijación y parasíntesis en el español americano del siglo XVI: una cala en las formaciones verbales.” InEchenique, María Teresa, and Sánchez Méndez, Juan P. (Eds.). Actas del V congreso internacional de historia de la lengua española–. Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Sihan, Gil, David, Gaponov, Sergey, Reifegerste, Jana., Yuditha, Tessa, Tatarinova, Tatiana, Progovac, Ljiljana, and Benítez-Burraco, Antonio
    2024 “Linguistic correlates of societal variation: A quantitative analysis.” PloS one, , e0300838. 10.1371/journal.pone.0300838
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300838 [Google Scholar]
  16. Coseriu, Eugenio
    1956 “La creación metafórica en el lenguaje.” Revista Nacional: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Del Barrio de la Rosa, Florencio
    2019 “Verbos con y sin prefijo en el CODEA-Dialectología histórica y aspectos variacionales de las formaciones en (a)-ar,(en)-ar,(a)-ecer y (en)-ecer.” Philologia hispalensis(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Detges, Ulrich, and Waltereit, Richard
    2002 “Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, () –. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dressler, Wolfgang
    1986 “Forma y función de los interfijos.” RSEL: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eddington, David
    2017 “Dialectal variation in Spanish diminutives: A performance model.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, , : –. 10.1515/shll‑2017‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Everett, Caleb., Blasi, Damián Ezequiel, and Roberts, Séan G.
    2015 “Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (): –. 10.1073/pnas.1417413112
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417413112 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fábregas, Antonio
    2007 “The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives.” Probus: –. 10.1515/PROBUS.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 “¿Son algunos interfijos morfemas apreciativos?” ELUA: –. 10.14198/ELUA2017.31.07
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2017.31.07 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fábregas, Antonio, Acedo, Víctor, Armstrong, Grant, Cuervo, María Cristina, and Puyol, Isabel
    (eds.) 2021The Routledge Handbook of Spanish morphology. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429318191
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318191 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fedzechkina, Maryja, Jaeger, T. Florian, and Newport, Elissa. L.
    2012 “Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (): –. 10.1073/pnas.1215776109
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215776109 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fernández Ramirez, Salvador
    1962 “A propósito de los diminutivos españoles.” STRENAE. Estudios de Filología e Historia dedicados al Profesor Manuel García Blanco, Tomo, Salamanca, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. García-Page, Mario
    1990 “Léxico y sintaxis locucionales: algunas consideraciones sobre las palabras idiomáticas.” Estudios Humanísticos: –. 10.18002/ehf.v0i12.4052
    https://doi.org/10.18002/ehf.v0i12.4052 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1991 “Un aspecto de morfología flexiva del español actual la presentación de morfemas alternantes en sustantivos unigéneros.” Español actual: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibson, Edward, Futrell, Richard, Piantadosi, Steven P., Dautriche, Isabelle, Mahowald, Kyle, Bergen, Leon, and Levy, Roger
    2019 “How Efficiency Shapes Human Language.” Trends in cognitive sciences, (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. González Ollé, Fernando
    1981 “La negación expresiva mediante la oposición sintagmática de género gramatical: el tipo sin dineros ni dineras y sus variantes.” InGeckeler Horst, Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte, Trabant, Jürgen and Weydt, Harald (eds). Logos semantikos. Inhonorem Eugenio Coseriu: –. Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Grégoire, Michaël
    2012 “Le lexique par le signifiant: Méthode en application à l’espagnol.” Presses Académiques Francophones.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Haiman, John
    2010 “The creation of new words.” Linguistics: –. 10.1515/ling.2010.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.017 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2013 “Decorative morphology in Khmer.” InWilliams, Jeffrey P. (ed.), The Aesthetics of Grammar, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139030489.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030489.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 “Why is grammaticalization irreversible?” Linguistics: . 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
  35. Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven J., and Norenzayan, Ara
    2010 “The weirdest people in the world?” The Behavioral and brain sciences (): –. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
  36. Hockett, Charles
    1947 “Problems of morphemic analysis.” Language: –. 10.2307/410295
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410295 [Google Scholar]
  37. Horno Chéliz, María Carmen, and Marqueta, Bárbara
    2023 “Del cerdolí y otros acrónimos.” Archiletras: Revista de lengua y letras: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kornfeld, Laura
    2016 “Una propuestita astutita: el diminutivo como recurso atenuador.” RILI, : –. 10.31819/rili‑2016‑142709
    https://doi.org/10.31819/rili-2016-142709 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lavi-Rotbain, Ori, and Arnon, Inbal
    2022 “The learnability consequences of Zipfian distributions in language.” Cognition, . 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105038
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105038 [Google Scholar]
  40. Levshina, Natalia, and Moran, Steven
    2021 “Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles.” Linguistics Vanguard, (), . 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0081 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lupyan, Gary, and Dale, Rick
    2016 “Why are there different languages? The role of adaptation in linguistic diversity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Majid, Asifa
    2015 “Cultural factors shape olfactory language.” Trends in cognitive sciences: (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. Malkiel, Yakov
    1958 “Los interfijos hispánicos: problema de lingüística histórica y estructural”. InCatalán, Diego (ed.), Miscelánea homenaje a André Martinet–. Universidad de La Laguna.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Martín Camacho, José Carlos
    2002El problema lingüístico de los interfijos españoles. Universidad de Extremadura.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Martín García, Josefa
    1998 “Los prefijos intensivos del español: caracterización morfosemántica.” ELUA: –. 10.14198/ELUA1998.12.07
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA1998.12.07 [Google Scholar]
  46. Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia
    2012 “Los diminutivos en español: aspectos morfológicos, semánticos y pragmáticos.” InLuque Toro, Luis, Medina, José Francisco, and Luque, Rocío (eds.), Léxico Español Actual–. Cafoscarina.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Menéndez Pidal, Ramón
    1940Manual de gramática histórica española. Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Moyna, María Irene
    2011Compound Words in Spanish. Theory and history. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.316
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.316 [Google Scholar]
  49. Neels, Jakob
    2019 Refining Frequency-Effect Explanations of Grammaticalisation (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Leipzig.
  50. Neels, Jakob., Hartmann, Stefan., and Ungerer, Tobias
    2023 “A quantum of salience. Reconsidering the role of extravagance in grammaticalization.” InDe Smet, Hendrik, Petré, Peter, and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (Eds.), Context, Intent and Variation in Grammaticalization–. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110753059‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110753059-003 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nishimura, Kimiyo
    2000 “Sobre algunos sufijos adjetivales de relación: -ero, -´ico, e -ístico en el español actual.” Lingüística Hispánica: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nettle, Daniel
    2012 “Social scale and structural complexity in human languages.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: –. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0216
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0216 [Google Scholar]
  53. Petré, Peter
    2017 “The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be ving].” English Language and Linguistics (): –. 10.1017/S1360674317000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000107 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pleyer, Michael
    2020 The everyday use of pretend in child language and child-directed speech: A corpus study (Doctoral dissertation). 10.11588/HEIDOK.00028873
    https://doi.org/10.11588/HEIDOK.00028873
  55. Portolés, José
    1999 “La interfijación.” InBosque, Ignacio, and Demonte, Violeta (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, –. Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. RAE and ASALE
    RAE and ASALE 2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Rio-Torto, Graça, and Lopes, Mailson
    2019 Fluctuación prefijal en el gallegoportugués y en el castellano medievales. Verba: –. 10.15304/elg.11.5105
    https://doi.org/10.15304/elg.11.5105 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rizza, Chris
    2009 “Semantically Redundant language: A case study.” Applied linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Roca, Ignacio
    2005 La gramática y la biología en el género del español (1a parte). Revista Española de Lingüística () –.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sabel, Joachim
    2000Expletives as features. Univ.-Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Serrano-Dolader, David
    1999 “La derivación verbal y la parasíntesis.” InBosque, Ignacio, and Demonte, Violeta (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española–. Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith, Kenny, and Culbertson, Jennifer
    2025 “Communicative pressures shape language during communication (not learning): Evidence from case-marking in artificial languages.” Cognition, , . Advance online publication. 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106164
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106164 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tal, Shira, and Arnon, Inbal
    2022 “Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking.” Cognition, . 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055 [Google Scholar]
  64. Trudgill, Peter
    2011Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Varela, Soledad
    1990 “Composición nominal y estructura temática.” Revista Española de Lingüística () –.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, Tianheng, Wichmann, Søren, Xia, Quansheng, and Ran, Qibin
    2023 “Temperature shapes language sonority: Revalidation from a large dataset.” PNAS nexus, , , pgad384. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad384
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad384 [Google Scholar]
  67. Westphal-Fitch, Gesche, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    2018 “Bioaesthetics: The evolution of aesthetic cognition in humans and other animals.” Progress in Brain Research: –. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wit, Ernst Jan, and Gillette, Marie
    1999 “What is Linguistic Redundancy?”. Technical Report, The University of Chicago. https://www.math.rug.nl/~ernst/linguistics/redundancy3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Zacarías, Ramón
    2006 “Formación de diminutivos con el sufijo /-ít-/; una propuesta desde la morfología natural.” Anuario de Letras: –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sic.25010.ben
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error