1887
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper investigates the diachrony of diminutives in Mojeño across four centuries. First, it shows that the three Mojeño diminutives have two lexical sources: ‘child’ and ‘seed’. This constitutes a counterexample to Jurafsky’s (1996) theory concerning the universal source of diminutives. Second, the paper investigates the grammaticalization process of diminutives and their further distributional and functional changes. It shows that the extension of the distribution onto verbs and grammatical parts of speech correlates with the gain of emotional connotations. It describes the evolution of emotional connotations of the diminutives and the pragmaticalization of their interactional functions until the eventual shift to purely expressive morphemes when diminutives lose their core meaning of ‘smallness’. Third, since each of the three language varieties has one ‘true’ diminutive only, two successive cycles of diminutive renewal are hypothesized, whereby an old diminutive is replaced by a new one.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00006.ros
2018-04-19
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    1999 The Arawak language family. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 65–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer, Laura
    1997 Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language21(3). 533–75. doi: 10.1075/sl.21.3.04bau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.3.04bau [Google Scholar]
  3. Becerra Casanovas, Rogers
    1980De ayer y de hoy. Diccionario del idioma mojeño a través del tiempo. Estudio comparativo sobre su evolución. La Paz: Proinsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berman, Ruth Aronson & Dan Isaac Slobin
    1994Relating events in narrative: a cross-linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, Nancy E.
    2003 The multiple functions of the definite article in Terena. Ms. Reprint Edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler, Nancy E. & Muriel Ekdahl
    2012Aprenda Terena. Anápolis: SIL Brasil.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Creissels, Denis
    1999 Origine et évolution des diminutifs et augmentatifs dans quelques langues africaines. Silexicales2, 29–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Danielsen, Swintha
    2007Baure: An Arawak language of Bolivia (Indigenous Languages of Latin America 6). Leiden: CNWS.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics49(2). 365–390. doi: 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dressler, Wolfgang & Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi
    1994Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110877052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877052 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gill, Wayne
    1957Trinitario grammar. San Lorenzo de Mojos: Misión Nuevas Tribus.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1993 Diccionario Trinitario-Castellano y Castellano-Trinitario. Ms. Reprint Edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grandi, Nicola
    2011 Renewal and innovation in the emergence of Indo-European evaluative morphology. In Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavel Stekauer (eds.), Diminutives and augmentatives in the languages of the world, 6vols. (Lexis), 5–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015 The place of evaluation within morphology. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 75–90. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Grandi, Nicola & Lívia Körtvélyessy
    2015 Introduction: Why evaluative morphology?In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 3–20. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  19. Höller, Alfredo
    1932Grammatik der Guarayo-Sprache. Hall in Tirol: Verlag der Missionsprokura der P.P. Franziskaner.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jurafsky, Daniel
    1996 Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language72(3). 533–78. doi: 10.2307/416278
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416278 [Google Scholar]
  21. LeSourd, Philip S.
    1995 Diminutive verb forms in Passamaquoddy. International Journal of American Linguistics61(1). 103–34. doi: 10.1086/466246
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466246 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marbán, Pedro
    1702Arte de la lengua Moxa, con su Vocabulario, y Cathecismo. Lima: Imprenta Real de Joseph de Contreras.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marcus, Inge
    1994 Classifiers in Terêna. Estudos LinguísticosXXIII(2). 912–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Matisoff, James A.
    1992 The mother of all morphemes. Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. In Martha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds.), Papers from the first annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 293–349. Tempe: Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, where are you? (Dial Books for Young Readers). New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mission, New Tribes
    Mission, New Tribes 2002Eto ‘chojriicovo mue ‘ma viya [The New Testament]. Sanford: New Tribes Mission.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mutz, Katrin
    2015 Evaluative morphology in a diachronic perspective. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 142–54. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Náñez Fernández, Emilio
    1973El diminutivo: historia y funciones en el español clásico y moderno. Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nieuwenhuis, Paul
    1985Diminutives. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Olza Zubiri, Jesús , Conchita Nuni de Chapi & Juan Tube
    2002Gramática Moja Ignaciana. Caracas: Universidad Católica Andres Bello.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ott, Willis & Rebecca Ott
    1967 Ignaciano. In Esther Matteson (ed.), Bolivian Indian Grammars, vol.I, 85–137. University of Oklahoma: SIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1983Diccionario ignaciano y castellano, con apuntes gramáticales, 2vols.Cochabamba: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pakendorf, Brigitte
    2016 Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross-linguistic comparison. Morphology. 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Payne, David
    1987 Some morphological elements of Maipuran Arawakan: Agreement affixes and the genitive construction. Language Sciences9(1). 57–75. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(87)80009‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(87)80009-8 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1991 A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol.3, 355–499. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ponsonnet, Maïa
    2014The language of emotions: The case of Dalabon (Australia). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.4 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2018 A preliminary typology of emotional connotations in morphological diminutives and augmentatives. In Maïa Ponsonnet & Marine Vuillermet (eds), Morphology and emotions across the world’s languages. Special issue of Studies in Language, 42(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reynoso Noverón, Jeanett
    2005 Procesos de gramaticalización por subjetivización: el uso del diminutivo en español. In David Eddigton (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 79–86. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rose, Françoise
    2008 The word-prosodic system of Mojeño Trinitario and pervasive vowel deletion. Paper presented atA Estrutura de Línguas Amazônicas: Fonologia e Gramática II, Recife.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2010 Dialectes en danger: les derniers locuteurs du mojeño javeriano de Bolivie. In Colette Grinevald & Michel Bert (eds.), Faits de Langues, vol.35–36, Linguistique de terrain sur langues en danger: locuteurs et linguistes, 255–64. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2011 Who is the third person ? Fluid transitivity in Mojeño Trinitario. International Journal of American Linguistics77(4), special issue on Argument-encoding systems in Bolivian Amazonian languages. 469–94. doi: 10.1086/662153
    https://doi.org/10.1086/662153 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2014 When vowel deletion blurs reduplication in Mojeño Trinitario. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in South-American languages (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7), 375–99. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004272415_015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004272415_015 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2015 Mojeño Trinitario. In Mily Crevels & Peter Muysken (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia, vol 3. Oriente, 59–97. La Paz: Plural Editores.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Saito, Akira
    2009 “Fighting against a hydra”: Jesuit Language Policy in Moxos. In Shinzo Kawamura & Cyril Veliath (eds.), Beyond the borders: Global perspective of Jesuit mission history, 350–63. Tokyo: Sophia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scalise, Sergio
    1984Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Štekauer, Pavel
    2015 Word-formation processes in evaluative morphology. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 43–60. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stump, Gregory T.
    2008 How peculiar is evaluative morphology?Journal of Linguistics29(01). 1. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700000037 [Google Scholar]
  48. Traugott, Elisabeth
    2010 Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: DeGruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1984 Diminutives and depreciatives: Semantic representation for derivational category. Quaderni di Semantica5. 123–30.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00006.ros
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00006.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error