Response

References

1. Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
   2012 The case differential: syntagmatic versus paradigmatic case – its status in synchrony and diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society110.3. 316–341. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2012.01315.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01315.x [Google Scholar]
2. Bulatović, Vesna
   2013 Modern theories of aspect and Serbian EL2 learners. Belgrade English Language & Literature StudiesV. 65–79. 10.18485/bells.2013.5.3
   https://doi.org/10.18485/bells.2013.5.3 [Google Scholar]
3. Fleischhauer, Jens & Adrian Czardybon
   2016 The role of verbal prefixes and particles in aspectual composition. Studies in Language40.1. 176–203. 10.1075/sl.40.1.06hel
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.06hel [Google Scholar]
4. Kabakčiev, Krasimir
   1984 The article and the aorist/imperfect distinction in Bulgarian: an analysis based on cross-language ‘aspect’ parallelisms. Linguistics22. 643–672.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kabakčiev, Krasimir
   2000 Aspect in English: a “common-sense” view of the interplay between verbal and nominal referents. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9355‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9355-7 [Google Scholar]
6. Leiss, Elisabeth
   2000 Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110825961
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825961 [Google Scholar]
7. Verkuyl, Henk
   1972 On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2478‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2478-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Verkuyl, Henk
   1993 A Theory of Aspectuality. The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511597848
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848 [Google Scholar]