1887
Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.00018.kop-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00018.kop
2021-02-09
2021-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ameka, Felix K. & Stephan C. Levinson
    2007 Introduction – The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals and other beasts. Linguistics45(5). 847–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aske, Jon
    1989 Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aurnague, Michel
    2015 Motion verbs and spatial PPs in French: from spatio-temporal structure to asymmetry and goal bias. Carnet de Grammaire, noº23. Rapports internes de CLLE-ERSS.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2019 About asymmetry of motion in French: Some properties and a principle. In Michael Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 31–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/hcp.66.01aur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.01aur [Google Scholar]
  5. Backhouse, Anthony E.
    1981 Japanese verbs for dress. Journal of Linguistics17. 17–29. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700006745
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700006745 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blake, Barry J.
    1977Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen , Nicholas J. Enfield , James Essegbey , Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano , Sotaro Kita , Friederike Lüpke & Felix Ameka
    2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language83(3). 495–532. doi:  10.1353/lan.2007.0116
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0116 [Google Scholar]
  8. Borillo, Andrée
    1998L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdin, Philippe
    1997 On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In Bohumil Palek , Osamu Fujimura & Jiří Václav Neustupný (eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, item orderings and universals. (Proceedings of the Conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996), 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowerman, Melissa , Marianne Gullberg , Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan
    2004 Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field manual, Vol.9, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. doi:  10.17617/2.492916
    https://doi.org/10.17617/2.492916 [Google Scholar]
  11. Burrow, Trigant & Sudhibhushan Bhattacharya
    1970The Pengo language: Grammar, texts, and vocabulary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. doi:  10.1017/S0041977X00129258
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00129258 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clancy, Patricia M.
    1985 The acquisition of Japanese. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Comrie, Bernard
    1981Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Creissels, Denis
    2006 Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: a typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.03cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.03cre [Google Scholar]
  15. Crystal, David
    2008A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th edn.Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444302776
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davies, John
    1981 Kobon. Lingua Descriptive Studies3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DeLancey, Scott
    1981 An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language57(3). 626–57. 10.2307/414343
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414343 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1997 Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Joan Bybee , John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 59–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.07del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.07del [Google Scholar]
  19. Dirven, René & Marjolijn Verspoor
    (eds.) 1999Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.1(1999)
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.1(1999) [Google Scholar]
  20. Dromi, Esther
    1979 More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: An analysis of Hebrew data. Journal of Child Language6. 547–562. 10.1017/S0305000900002531
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002531 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fagard, Benjamin
    2006 Evolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes: Illustration ou contre-exemple de la primauté du spatiale. Paris: Université Paris 7. PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fähnrich, Heinz
    1993Kurze Grammatik der Georgian Sprache. 3rd ed.Leipzig: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopedie.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1972 How to know whether you’re coming or going. In Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971, Referate des 6. Linguistischen Kolloquiums (11–14August 1971, Kopenhagen), 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1975Santa Cruz lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1977 The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 59–81. New York: Academic Press. doi:  10.1163/9789004368866_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368866_005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
    2011 L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : Vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3. 71–98. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000006 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2016 On the morpho-syntax of path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals69(3). 341–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fortis, Jean-Michel , Colette Grinevald , Anetta Kopecka & Alice Vittrant
    2011 L’expression de la trajectoire: Perspectives typologiques. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3(2). 33–41. doi:  10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fowles, John
    1969The French lieutenant’s woman. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1981La mujer del teniente francés. Barcelona: Editorial Argos Vergara.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Freeman, Norman H. , Sinha, Chris G. & Jacqueline A. Stedmon
    1981 The allative bias in three-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language8(2). 283–296. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900003196
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900003196 [Google Scholar]
  32. Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
    2018 A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames10(1). 61–97. doi:  10.1075/cf.00011.geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00011.geo [Google Scholar]
  33. Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Athina Sioupi
    2015 Framing the difference between Sources and Goals in Change of Possession events: A corpus-based study in German and Modern Greek. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association3. 105–122. doi:  10.1515/gcla‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas
    2017 A diachronic take on the Source–Goal asymmetry: Evidence from inner Asia Minor Greek. In Sylvia Luraghi , Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 179–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.188.07geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.07geo [Google Scholar]
  35. Georgakopoulos, Thanasis , Holden Härtl & Athina Sioupi
    2019 Goal realization: An empirically based comparison between English, German, and Greek. Languages in Contrast19(2). 280–309. doi:  10.1075/lic.17010.geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17010.geo [Google Scholar]
  36. Grinevald, Colette
    2011 On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3(2). 43–70. doi:  10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gruber, Jeffrey
    1965Studies in lexical semantics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Iacobini, Claudio , Luisa Corona , Noemi de Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto
    2017 How should a classical Satellite-Framed language behave? Path encoding asymmetries in Ancient Greek and Latin. In Sylvia Luraghi , Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds), Space in diachrony, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.04iac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.04iac [Google Scholar]
  39. Ikegami, Yoshihiko
    1979 ‘Goal’ over ‘source’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. Hungarian Studies in English12. 139–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1982 Source vs. Goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Robert N. St. Clair and Walburga von Raffler-Engel (eds.), Language and cognitive styles: Patterns of neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic development, 292–308. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1987 ‘Source’ and ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ishibashi, Miyuki
    2010 The (a)symmetry of Source and Goal in Motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In Giovanna Marotta , Alessandro Lenci , Linda Meini & Francesco Rovai (eds), Space in language, Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Firenze: Edizioni ETS.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2012 The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Put and Take events: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.100.17ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100.17ish [Google Scholar]
  44. Ishibashi, Miyuki , Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
    2006Trajectoire : matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. tulquest.huma-num.fr/fr/node/132 (last access11 December 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jackendoff, Ray
    1983Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Johanson, Megan , Selemis Stathis & Anna Papafragou
    2019 The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: Language-general vs. language-specific aspects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience34 (7). 826–840. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1584323
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1584323 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jones, Michael A.
    1983 Speculations on the expression of movement in French. Language Center Occasional Papers (University of Essex) 27. 165–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kabata, Kaori
    2013 Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences36: 78–89. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.021 [Google Scholar]
  50. Koenig, Jean-Pierre , Gail Mauner & Breton Bienvenue
    2003 Arguments for adjuncts. Cognition89(2). 67–103. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00082‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00082-9 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kölver, Ulrike
    1985 Kasusrelationen im Birmanischen. In Frans Plank (ed.). Relational typology, 195–212. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110848731.195
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848731.195 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kopecka, Anetta
    2017 Source-oriented and Goal-oriented events in Old and Modern French. In Sylvia Luraghi , Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.11kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.11kop [Google Scholar]
  53. Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
    2010Source-Goal (a)symétrie – Guide de travail. Projet Trajectoire, CNRS-TUL (unpublished ms.).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
    2011 L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: Perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3(2). 131–149. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000009 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kopecka, Anetta & Bhuvana Narasimhan
    (eds.) 2012Events of Putting and Taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kutscher, Silvia
    2010 When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: the case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen variety of Laz (South-Caucasian). STUF – Language Typology and Universals63(3). 252–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lakoff, Georges
    1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
    2005 Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition96. 1–33. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2012 Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between goal and source path. Cognitive Science36(3). 517–544. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01220.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Lakusta, Laura & Susan Carey
    2015 Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development11(2). 152–175. doi:  10.1080/15475441.2014.896168
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.896168 [Google Scholar]
  61. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1996 Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom , Merrill F. Peterson , Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds.), Language and space, 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2003Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  63. Levinson, Stephen
    1999 Hypotheses concerning basic locative constructions and the verbal elements within them. In David Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 55–56. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Levinson, Stephen C. & Penelope Brown
    2012 Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 273–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.100.18lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100.18lev [Google Scholar]
  65. Levinson, Stephen C. & David. P. Wilkins
    2006 The background to the study of the language of space. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486753.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486753.002 [Google Scholar]
  66. MacKenzie, J. Lachlan
    1978 Ablative–locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics14(2). 129–156. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700005831
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700005831 [Google Scholar]
  67. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    2002 Prépositions françaises en diachronie: Une catégorie en question. Lingvisticae Investigationes25(2). 205–221. 10.1075/li.25.2.03mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.25.2.03mar [Google Scholar]
  68. McCawley, James D.
    1978 Notes on Japanese clothing verbs. In John Hinds & Irwin Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, 68–78. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Miyajima, Tatsuo
    1986 Kaku shihai no ryou-teki sokumen. In Yotaka Miyaji (ed.), Ronshû nihongo kenkyû, Vol. 1: Gendai-hen, 41–58. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Nam, Seungho
    2004Goal and Source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Seoul National University. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Nikitina, Tatiana
    2009 Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics47(5). 1113–41. 10.1515/LING.2009.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.039 [Google Scholar]
  72. Noonan, Michael
    2008 Case compounding in the Bodic languages. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations, Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.81.07noo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.81.07noo [Google Scholar]
  73. Pajusalu, Renate , Neeme Kahusk , Heili Orav , Ann Veismann , Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim
    2013 The encoding of motion event in Estonian. In Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, 44–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Pantcheva, Marina
    2010 The syntactic structure of locations, goals and sources. Linguistics48(5). 1043–1081. doi:  10.1515/ling.2010.034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.034 [Google Scholar]
  75. Papafragou, Anna
    2010 Source-Goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science34: 1064–1092. doi:  10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2010.01107.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x [Google Scholar]
  76. Papahagi, Cristiana
    2005 Les prépositions de la trajectoire en français et en roumain: Étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Université Paris 3. PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pléh, Csaba
    1998 Early spatial case markers in Hungarian children. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 211–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Pléh, Csaba , Zsuzsanna Vinkler & László Kálmán
    1996 Early morphology of spatial express-ions in Hungarian children: A childes study. Acta Linguistica Hungarica40. 129–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng
    2007 Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science31. 705–719. 10.1080/15326900701399954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ricca, Davide
    1993I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata
    2007 Crosslingusitic grammaticalization patterns of the allative . Linguistic Typology11(3). 451–514. doi:  10.1515/LINGTY.2007.031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.031 [Google Scholar]
  82. Richardson, John F.
    1984 On some though Source-Goal asymmetries. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference in Linguistics1 (CESCOL Proceedings). 275–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Sapir, Edward , Morris Swadesh & Alice Morris
    1932 The expression of the ending-point relation in English, French, and German. Language8(1), Language Monograph 10. 10.2307/522048
    https://doi.org/10.2307/522048 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sarda, Laure
    2019 French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/hcp.66.02sar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.02sar [Google Scholar]
  85. Sinha, Chris , Lis A. Thorseng , Mariko Hayashi & Kim Plunkett
    1994 Comparative spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics11(4). 253–287. doi:  10.1093/jos/11.4.253
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/11.4.253 [Google Scholar]
  86. Slobin, I. Dan
    1997 Mind, code, and text. In Joan Bybee , John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in language function and language type, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.24slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.24slo [Google Scholar]
  87. 2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Topological & contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 2005 Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit Diskin Ravid & Havat Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/1‑4020‑7911‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  89. Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting
    1994 Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2018 The goal bias revised: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6(1).143–166. doi:  10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  91. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rodhe
    2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Svorou, Soteria
    1994The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.25 [Google Scholar]
  93. Talmy, Len
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 2000Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Taremaa, Piia
    2013 Fictive and actual motion in Estonian: Encoding space. SKY Journal of Linguistics26. 151–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    1996An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Verkerk, Annemarie
    2017 The goal-over-source principle in European languages: Preliminary results from a parallel corpus study. In Sylvia Luraghi , Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.188.01ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.01ver [Google Scholar]
  99. Verspoor, Marjolijn , René Dirven & Günter Radden
    1999 Putting concepts together: Syntax. In René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Vittrant, Alice
    2015 Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian Languages. In Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), Southeast Asia: The state of arts, 586–632. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9781501501685‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501501685-014 [Google Scholar]
  101. Vuillermet, Marine & Anetta Kopecka
    2019 “Trajectoire”: A methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. In Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology, 97–124. Special issue ofLanguage, Documentation and Conservation16.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Wälchli, Bernhard & Fernando Zúñiga
    2009 Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Language Typology and Universals59(3). 284–303. doi:  10.1524/stuf.2006.59.3.284
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2006.59.3.284 [Google Scholar]
  103. Wilkins, David P. & Deborah Hill
    1995 When go means come: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics6(2/3). 209–259. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2‑3.209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2-3.209 [Google Scholar]
  104. Zanchi, Chiara
    2017 New evidence for the Source-Goal asymmetry. Ancient Greek preverbs. In Sylvia Luraghi , Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.). Space in diachrony, 147–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.188.06zan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.06zan [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00018.kop
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.00018.kop
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error