2015 Motion verbs and spatial PPs in French: from spatio-temporal structure to asymmetry and goal bias. Carnet de Grammaire, noº23. Rapports internes de CLLE-ERSS.
2019 About asymmetry of motion in French: Some properties and a principle. In
Michael Aurnague
&
Dejan Stosic
(eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 31–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.66.01aur
1997 On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In
Bohumil Palek
,
Osamu Fujimura
&
Jiří Václav Neustupný
(eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, item orderings and universals. (Proceedings of the Conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996), 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.
2004 Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In
Asifa Majid
(ed.), Field manual, Vol.9, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. doi: 10.17617/2.492916
1985 The acquisition of Japanese. In
Dan I. Slobin
(ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2006 Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: a typological study. In
Maya Hickmann
&
Stéphane Robert
(eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.03cre
1997 Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In
Joan Bybee
,
John Haiman
&
Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 59–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.07del
2006 Evolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes: Illustration ou contre-exemple de la primauté du spatiale. Paris: Université Paris 7. PhD dissertation.
1972 How to know whether you’re coming or going. In
Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen
(ed.), Linguistik 1971, Referate des 6. Linguistischen Kolloquiums (11–14August 1971, Kopenhagen), 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
1977 The case for case reopened. In
Peter Cole
&
Jerrold M. Sadock
(eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 59–81. New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1163/9789004368866_005
2011 L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : Vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3. 71–98. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000006
Freeman, Norman H.
,
Sinha, Chris G.
&
Jacqueline A. Stedmon
1981 The allative bias in three-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language8(2). 283–296. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900003196
2018 A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames10(1). 61–97. doi: 10.1075/cf.00011.geo
2015 Framing the difference between Sources and Goals in Change of Possession events: A corpus-based study in German and Modern Greek. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association3. 105–122. doi: 10.1515/gcla‑2015‑0007
2017 A diachronic take on the Source–Goal asymmetry: Evidence from inner Asia Minor Greek. In
Sylvia Luraghi
,
Tatiana Nikitina
&
Chiara Zanchi
(eds.), Space in diachrony, 179–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.188.07geo
2019 Goal realization: An empirically based comparison between English, German, and Greek. Languages in Contrast19(2). 280–309. doi: 10.1075/lic.17010.geo
2017 How should a classical Satellite-Framed language behave? Path encoding asymmetries in Ancient Greek and Latin. In
Sylvia Luraghi
,
Tatiana Nikitina
&
Chiara Zanchi
(eds), Space in diachrony, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.04iac
1982 Source vs. Goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In
Robert N. St. Clair
and
Walburga von Raffler-Engel
(eds.), Language and cognitive styles: Patterns of neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic development, 292–308. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
1987 ‘Source’ and ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In
René Dirven
&
Günter Radden
(eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
2010 The (a)symmetry of Source and Goal in Motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In
Giovanna Marotta
,
Alessandro Lenci
,
Linda Meini
&
Francesco Rovai
(eds), Space in language, Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Firenze: Edizioni ETS.
2012 The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In
Anetta Kopecka
&
Bhuvana Narasimhan
(eds.), Put and Take events: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.100.17ish
2006Trajectoire : matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. tulquest.huma-num.fr/fr/node/132 (last access11 December 2020).
Johanson, Megan
,
Selemis Stathis
&
Anna Papafragou
2019 The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: Language-general vs. language-specific aspects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience34 (7). 826–840. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1584323
2013 Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences36: 78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.021
2017 Source-oriented and Goal-oriented events in Old and Modern French. In
Sylvia Luraghi
,
Tatiana Nikitina
&
Chiara Zanchi
(eds.), Space in diachrony, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.11kop
2011 L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: Perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers3(2). 131–149. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000009
2010 When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: the case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen variety of Laz (South-Caucasian). STUF – Language Typology and Universals63(3). 252–271.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
2012 Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between goal and source path. Cognitive Science36(3). 517–544. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01220.x
2015 Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development11(2). 152–175. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2014.896168
1996 Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In
Paul Bloom
,
Merrill F. Peterson
,
Lynn Nadel
&
Mary A. Peterson
(eds.), Language and space, 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1999 Hypotheses concerning basic locative constructions and the verbal elements within them. In
David Wilkins
(ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 55–56. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
2012 Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In
Anetta Kopecka
&
Bhuvana Narasimhan
(eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 273–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.100.18lev
2006 The background to the study of the language of space. In
Stephen C. Levinson
&
David P. Wilkins
(eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486753.002
1978 Ablative–locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics14(2). 129–156. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700005831
2009 Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics47(5). 1113–41. 10.1515/LING.2009.039
2008 Case compounding in the Bodic languages. In
Greville G. Corbett
&
Michael Noonan
(eds.), Case and grammatical relations, Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.81.07noo
Pajusalu, Renate
,
Neeme Kahusk
,
Heili Orav
,
Ann Veismann
,
Kadri Vider
&
Haldur Õim
2013 The encoding of motion event in Estonian. In
Mila Vulchanova
&
Emile van der Zee
(eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, 44–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2010 Source-Goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science34: 1064–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2010.01107.x
1998 Early spatial case markers in Hungarian children. In
Eve V. Clark
(ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 211–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2019 French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In
Michel Aurnague
&
Dejan Stosic
(eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.66.02sar
Sinha, Chris
,
Lis A. Thorseng
,
Mariko Hayashi
&
Kim Plunkett
1994 Comparative spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics11(4). 253–287. doi: 10.1093/jos/11.4.253
1997 Mind, code, and text. In
Joan Bybee
,
John Haiman
&
Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.), Essays in language function and language type, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.24slo
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In
Sven Strömqvist
&
Ludo Verhoeven
(eds.), Relating events in narrative: Topological & contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
2005 Relating narrative events in translation. In
Dorit Diskin Ravid
&
Havat Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot
(eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/1‑4020‑7911‑7_10
1994 Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
2018 The goal bias revised: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6(1).143–166. doi: 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0007
2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In
Günter Radden
&
Klaus-Uwe Panther
(eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
1985 Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In
Timothy Shopen
(ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
2017 The goal-over-source principle in European languages: Preliminary results from a parallel corpus study. In
Sylvia Luraghi
,
Tatiana Nikitina
&
Chiara Zanchi
(eds.), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.188.01ver
1999 Putting concepts together: Syntax. In
René Dirven
&
Marjolijn Verspoor
(eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2015 Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian Languages. In
Nick J. Enfield
&
Bernard Comrie
(eds), Southeast Asia: The state of arts, 586–632. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9781501501685‑014
2019 “Trajectoire”: A methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. In
Aimée Lahaussois
&
Marine Vuillermet
(eds.), Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology, 97–124. Special issue ofLanguage, Documentation and Conservation16.
2009 Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Language Typology and Universals59(3). 284–303. doi: 10.1524/stuf.2006.59.3.284
2017 New evidence for the Source-Goal asymmetry. Ancient Greek preverbs. In
Sylvia Luraghi
,
Tatiana Nikitina
&
Chiara Zanchi
(eds.). Space in diachrony, 147–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.188.06zan