1887
Volume 41, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the form-meaning relationship within a subpart of the lexicon, namely lexical reduplication. It compares the semantic classification of lexical reduplication in diverse languages, focusing on three quantitative studies on the distributions of semantic categories in three typologically and genetically unrelated languages, Bikol, Tibetan and Arabic. On this basis, it is argued that the common view that lexical reduplications are a “semantically arbitrary class” and as such irrelevant for studies on reduplication is not justified. It is in contrast claimed that the mapping of certain meanings on this specific phonological pattern is highly iconic, and that these word forms can be classified as a specific subgroup of This group even shows remarkable parallels with the prototypical meanings of morphological reduplication. An explanation for this – certainly controversially discussed – observation could be provided by the cognitive semiotic concept of “cross-modal iconicity” ( Ahlner & Zlatev 2010 ).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16024.mat
2018-03-30
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbi, Anvita
    1992Reduplication in South Asian languages. An areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abraham, Werner
    2005 Intensity and diminution triggered by reduplicating morphology: Janus-faced iconicity. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 547–568. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.547
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.547 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev
    2010 Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies38(1). 298–348.10.12697/SSS.2010.38.1‑4.11
    https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2010.38.1-4.11 [Google Scholar]
  4. Akita, Kimi
    2009 A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. Kobe: Kobe University PhD dissertation. www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/repository/thesis/d1/D1004724.pdf (13September 2016).
  5. Auracher, Jan
    2015 Synaesthetic sound iconicity: phonosemantic associations between acoustic features of phonemes and emotional behavior. In Masako K. Hiraga , William J. Herlofsky , Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 93–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, Benjamin K.
    2004 The psychological reality of phonaestemes. Language80. 290–297. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0056 [Google Scholar]
  7. Berlin, Brent
    1992Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400862597
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862597 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blasi, Damián , Søren Wichman , Harald Hammarström , Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen
    2016 Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciene 2016 (PNAS). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605782113.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113 [Google Scholar]
  9. Botha, Rudolf P.
    1988Form and meaning in word formation: A study of Afrikaans reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511659447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659447 [Google Scholar]
  10. Braun, Maria & Ingo Plag
    2003 How transparent is creole morphology? A study of early Sranan word-formation. In Geert Booij & Yap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 81–104. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/0‑306‑48223‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48223-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar . Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clynes, Adrian
    1995Topics in the phonology and morphology of Balinese [based on the dialect of Singaraja, North Bali]. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1996 Interactions of semantics and phonology: Evidence from an Austronesian language. In Shobhana L. Chellian & Willem J. De Reuse (eds.), Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 33–50. Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1998The emergence of the marked: interactions of phonology and semantics in Balinese. University of Brunei Darussalam. Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Diffloth, Gérard
    1979 Expressive phonology and prosaic phonology in Mon-Khmer. In Theraphan L. Thongkum , Vichin Panupong , Pranee Kullavanijaya & M. R. Kalaya Tingsabadh (eds.), Studies in Tai and Mon-Khmer phonetics and phonology. In Honour of Eugénie J. A. Henderson , 49–59. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dressler, Wolfgang U.
    2000 Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology (Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 12), 1–10. München: Lincom Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dressler, Wolfgang U. , Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk , Natalia Gagarina & Marianne Kilani-Schoch
    2005 Reduplication in child language. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 455–474. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.455
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.455 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dingemanse, Mark
    2009 Ideophones in unexpected places. In Peter K. Austin , Olivier Bond , Monik Charette , David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, 83–97. London: School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2011The meaning and use of Ideophones. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute Nijmegen, PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass6(10). 654–672. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.361
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 Ideophones and reduplication. Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language39(4). 946–970.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dingemanse, Mark , Damian E. Blasi , Gary Lupayan , Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
    2015 Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(10). 603–615. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels
    2012 Iconicity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 379–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. El Zarka, Dina
    2005 On the borderline of reduplication: Gemination and other consonant doubling in Arabic morphology. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 369–394. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.369 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2009 Verbale Pluralität in ägyptisch-arabischen vierkonsonantigen Verben. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik/Journal of Arabic Linguistics/Journal de Linguistique Arabe50. 51–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fischer, Olga
    2011 Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Pascal Michelucci , Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Semblance and signification, 55–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ill.10.04fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.10.04fis [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodwin Gómez, Gale
    2009 Reduplication, ideophones, and onomatopoetic repetition in Yanomami. Grazer Linguistische Studien71. 21–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2014 Reduplication in the Yanomae language of Northern Brazil. In Gale Goodwin Gómez & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7), 161–183. Leiden & Boston: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004272415_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004272415_008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harrison, Sheldon P. & Salich Y. Albert
    1977Mokilese-English dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hess, Thomas
    1966 Snohomish chameleon morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics32. 350–356. doi: 10.1086/464924
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464924 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hinton, Leanne , Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala
    1994 Introduction: sound symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton , Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hurch, Bernhard & Veronika Mattes
    2005 Über die Entstehung von partieller Reduplikation. In Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon & Christian Winkler (eds.), Sprache und Natürlichkeit. Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, 137–156. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Inkelas, Sharon
    2014 Non-concatenative derivation: Reduplication. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 169–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kiyomi, Setsuko
    1995 A new approach to reduplication: A semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics27(6). 1145–1167.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Klamer, Marian
    2001 Expressives and iconicity in the lexicon. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 165–181. Amsterdam & Philadephia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.44.14kla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.14kla [Google Scholar]
  37. 2002 Semantically motivated patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language78 (2). 258–286. doi: 10.1353/lan.2002.0101
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0101 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kocher, Frieda
    1921Reduplikationsbildungen im Französischen und Italienischen. Aarau: Sauerländer & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité
    2001 The iconic interpretation of reduplication: Issues in the study of reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. European Journal of English Studies5(1). 59–80. doi: 10.1076/ejes.5.1.59.4783
    https://doi.org/10.1076/ejes.5.1.59.4783 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kröll, Heinz
    1991 Beitrag zu den Reduplikationen im Portugiesischen (II). Lusorama15. 25–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lisboa, Marcos de
    1754Vocabulario de la lengua Bicol. Manila.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Maas, Utz
    2005 Syntactic reduplication in Arabic. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 395–429. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.395 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mattes, Veronika
    2014Types of reduplication. A case study of Bikol. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mayerthaler, Willi
    1977Studien zur theoretischen und zur französischen Morphologie, Reduplikation, Echowörter, morphologische Natürlichkeit, Haplologie, Produktivität, Regeltelescoping, paradigmatischer Ausgleich. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111592503
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111592503 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mintz, Malcolm W.
    2001 Bikol. In Jane Garry & Carl Rubino (eds.), Encyclopedia of the world’s languages: past and present, 90–95. New York & Dublin: H.W. Wilson Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2004Bikol Dictionary. diksionáriong bíkol. Vol.I and II. Perth: Indonesian/Malay Texts and Resources.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mintz, Malcolm W. & José Del Rosario Britannico
    1985Bikol-English dictionary . diksionariong bikol-inglés. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Moravcsik, Edith A.
    1978 Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, vol.3, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Niepokuj, Mary
    1997The development of verbal reduplication in Indo-European (Journal of Indoeuropean Studies Monograph 24). Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Nöth, Winfried
    2015 Three paradigms of iconicity research in language and literature. In Masako K. Hiraga , William J. Herlofsky , Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 13–34. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Novotna, Jana
    2000 Reduplication in Swahili. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere64. 57–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Perniss, Pamela , Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella, Vigliocco
    2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology1(227). 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Procházka, Stephan
    1995 Semantische Funktionen der reduplizierten Wurzeln im Arabischen. Archiv Orientalni63. 39–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pott, August Friedrich
    1862Doppelung als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel der Sprache. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer. reduplication.uni-graz.at/pott/.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rangjung Yeshe Publications
    Rangjung Yeshe Publications 1996–2000The Rangjung Yeshe Tibetan-English Dharma dictionary. Ranjung Yeshe translations and publications in cooperation with the Karma Kagyu Buddhist Network (RYTP-KKBN). rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Regier, Terry
    1998 Reduplication and the arbitrariness of the sign. In Morton A. Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 887–892. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts, John R.
    1991 Reduplication in Amele. In Tom Dutton (ed.), Papers in Papuan Linguistics No. 1 (Pacific Linguistics Series A-73), 115–146. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rubino, Carl R.
    2001 Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 303–320. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.44.24rub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.24rub [Google Scholar]
  59. 2005 Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 11–29. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.11
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.11 [Google Scholar]
  60. Saperstein, Andrew D.
    1997A word-and-paradigm approach to reduplication. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schindler, Wolfgang
    1991 Reduplizierende Wortbildung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung44(5). 597–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schütz, Albert S.
    1985The Fijian language. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwaiger, Thomas
    2015 Reduplication. In Peter Müller , Ingeborg Ohnheiser , Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (HSK 40.1), 467–484. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. . 2017. The structure of reduplicants: a typological investigation of iconicity and preferred form in reduplication. University of Graz: Doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Singh, Rajendra
    2005 Reduplication in Modern Hindi and the theory of reduplication. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 263–281. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911466.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911466.263 [Google Scholar]
  66. Skoda, Françoise
    1982Le redoublement expressif: un universal linguistique. Analyse du procédé en grec ancien et en d’autres langues (Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France 15). Paris: SELAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sonesson, Göran
    2008 Prolegomena to a general theory of iconicity. Considerations on language, gesture, and pictures. In Willem Klaas & Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in language, 47–72. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/ill.7.05son
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.7.05son [Google Scholar]
  68. Stolz, Thomas
    2007a Das ist doch keine Reduplikation! In Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze (eds.), Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation. Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung, 47–80. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2007b Re: Reduplication: Iconic vs. counter-iconic principles (and their areal correlates). In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas. Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective, 317–350. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.88.14sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.88.14sto [Google Scholar]
  70. Stolz, Thomas , Natalyia Levkovych & Barbara Dewein
    2009 Reduplicative stem formation: a comparative look at Maltese and Chamorro. Ilsienna1. 87–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Stolz, Thomas , Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze
    2011Total Reduplication. The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. doi: 10.1524/9783050050973
    https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050050973 [Google Scholar]
  72. Tamura, Suzuko
    2000The Ainu language (ICHEL Linguistic Studies 12). Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Tsujimura, Natsuko
    2005 A constructional approach to mimetic verbs. In Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots, 137–154. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.4.09tsu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.4.09tsu [Google Scholar]
  74. 2014 Mimetic verbs and meaning. In Franz Rainer , Francesco Gardani , Hans Christian Luschützky & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning. Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012, 303–314. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.327.21tsu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.21tsu [Google Scholar]
  75. Vollmann, Ralf
    2009 Reduplication in Tibetan. Grazer Linguistische Studien71. 115–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz
    (eds.) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44 [Google Scholar]
  77. Voort, Hein van der
    2003 Reduplication of person markers in Kwaza. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia35. 65–94. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2003.10416074
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2003.10416074 [Google Scholar]
  78. Usuki, Takeshi & Kimi Akita
    2015 What’s in a mimetic?: On the dynamicity of its iconic stems. In Masako K. Hiraga , William J. Herlofsky , Kazuko, Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity. East meets West, 109–123. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Westermann, Diedrich Hermann
    1937 Laut und Sinn in einigen westafrikanischen Sudan-Sprachen. Archiv für vergleichende Phonetik1. 154–72 & 193–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2015 Diminutive verbs in German: semantic analysis and theoretical implications. Morphology25. 183–227. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑015‑9258‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9258-z [Google Scholar]
  81. Wiese, Richard
    1990 Über die Interaktion von Morphologie und Phonologie: Reduplikation im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung43(5). 603–624.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16024.mat
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16024.mat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): expressives , iconicity , lexicon , reduplication and semantics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error