Marking the unexpected

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology16. 435–485. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
3. Barss, Andrew , Ken Hale , Ellavina Tsosie Perkins & Margaret Speas
   1992 In C. T. James Huang & Robert May (eds.), Logical structure and linguistic structure, 25–47. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3472‑9_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_2 [Google Scholar]
4. Behrens, Leila
   2012 Evidentiality, modality, focus and other puzzles. In Andrea C. Schalley (ed.), Practical theories and empirical practice, 185–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.40.08beh
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.40.08beh [Google Scholar]
5. Bianchi, Valentina , Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Crushina
   2014 Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and the evaluative dimension. Draft.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bruil, Martine
   2014 Clause-typing and evidentiality in Ecuadorian Siona. Leiden: Leiden University Ph.D. dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. New York: Academic Press Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chafe, W.
   1979 The flow of thought and the flow of language. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax, 159–181. Lund: Lund University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chafe, Wallace
   1980 The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistics aspects of narrative production. Advances in Discourse Processes, vol.3. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols
    (eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1995 The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian languages, and English. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 349–388. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.32.15cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.15cha [Google Scholar]
12. Collins, James
    1987 Reported speech in Navajo myth narratives. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Linguistic action: Some empirical-conceptual studies, 69–84. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Comrie, Bernard
    2000 Evidentials: semantics and history. In Lars Johanson and Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, 1-12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Croft, William
    2005 Modern syntactic typology. In Shibatani & Bynon (eds.), Approaches to language typology, 85–144. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cruschina, Silvio
    2012 Discourse-related features and functional projections (Oxford Comparative Studies in Syntax). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759613.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759613.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. DeLancey, Scott
    1990 A note on evidentiality in Hare. International Journal of American Linguistics56. 152–158. doi: 10.1086/466142
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466142 [Google Scholar]
17. DeLancey, Scott
    1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology1. 33–52. doi: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33 [Google Scholar]
18. DeLancey, Scott
    2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics33(3). 371–384. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
19. DeLancey, Scott
    2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology16(3). 529–564. doi: 10.1515/lingty‑2012‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
20. Du Bois, John , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Danae Paolina & Susanna Cumming
    1993 Outline of discourse transcription. InSanta Barbara papers in linguistics, Vol.4. Santa Barbara: University of California, Department of Linguistics; In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Elgin, Patricia Anne Suzette
    1973 Some topics in Navajo syntax. San Diego: University of California, San Diego Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Field, Margaret
    2007 Increments in Navajo conversation. Pragmatics17(4). 637–646. doi: 10.1075/prag.17.4.07fie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.07fie [Google Scholar]
23. Givón, Talmy
    2001 Syntax: An introduction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gordon, Matthew
    2016 Phonological typology: The cross-linguistic study of sound systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. de Haan, Ferdinand
    2008 Evidentiality in Athabaskan. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics16. 67–81.
    [Google Scholar]
26. de Haan, Ferdinand
    2012 Evidentiality and mirativity. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0036
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0036 [Google Scholar]
27. Heine, Bernd , Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Holton, Gary
    2005 Pitch, tone and intonation in Tanacross. In Sharon Hargus & Keren Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 249–276. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.269.14hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.14hol [Google Scholar]
29. Holton, Gary & Olga Lovick
    2008 Evidentiality in Dena’ina Athabaskan. Anthropological Linguistics50(3–4). 292–323.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kiss, Katalin É.
    1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language74(2). 245–273. doi: 10.1353/lan.1998.0211
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211 [Google Scholar]
31. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
32. Lazard, Gilbert
    1999 Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology3(1). 91–110. doi: 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 [Google Scholar]
33. Leer, Jeff
    2005 How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. In Sharon Hargus & Keren Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 278–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.269.17lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.269.17lee [Google Scholar]
34. McDonough, Joyce
    2000 How to use Young and Morgan’s “The Navajo Language.” In K. M. Crosswhite & J. S. Magnuson (eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences1(2), 195–214.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McDonough, Joyce
    2002 The prosody of interrogative and focus constructions in Navajo. In A. Carnie , M. Willie & H. Harley (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammer, 191–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mithun, Marianne
    1986 Evidential diachrony in northern Iroquoian. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 89–112. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mithun, Marianne
    2013 What can revitalization work teach us about documentation?In Mihas, Elena , Bernard Perley , Gabriel Rei-Doval & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), Responses to language endangerment. In honor of Mickey Noonan. New directions in language documentation and language revitalization, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.142.02mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.142.02mit [Google Scholar]
38. Mithun, Marianne
    (ed.) 2015 Navajo conversational corpus, compiled with support from National Science Foundation DEL grant BCS-0853598.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Murray, Sarah E.
    2010 Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Ph.D. dissertation.
40. Myhill, John & Janet Zhiqun Xing
    1996 Towards an operation definition of discourse contrast. Studies in Language20(2). 303–360. doi: 10.1075/sl.20.2.04myh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.2.04myh [Google Scholar]
41. Nuckolls, Janis & Lev Michael
    (eds.) 2014 Evidentiality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.63
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.63 [Google Scholar]
42. Olbertz, Hella
    2009 Mirativity and exclamatives in functional discourse grammar: Evidence from Spanish. In Evelien Keizer & Gerry Wanders (eds.), The London Papers I, Special Issue of Web Papers in Functional Grammar82, 66–82.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Palmer, F. R.
    2001 Problematizing Mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics15(2). 312–342.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Peterson, Tyler
    . 2017. Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Peterson, Tyler
    2010 Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. In Tyler Peterson & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Evidence from evidentials. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics28, 129–159.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Plungian, Vladimir A.
    2001 The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics33. 349–357. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00006‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00006-0 [Google Scholar]
47. Reichard, Gladys A.
    1951 Navaho grammar. New York: Augustin.
    [Google Scholar]
48. de Reuse, Willem Joseph
    2003 Evidentiality in western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies of evidentiality, 79–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.07reu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.07reu [Google Scholar]
49. Rice, Keren D.
    1986 Some remarks on direct and indirect speech in Slave (Northern Athapaskan). In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 47–76. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110871968.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.47 [Google Scholar]
50. Rice, Keren
    1989 A grammar of Slave. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110861822
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861822 [Google Scholar]
51. San Roque, Lila , Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe
    2015 Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 [Google Scholar]
52. Saxon, Leslie
    1998 Complement clauses in Dogrib. In Pamela Munro & Leanne Hinton (eds.), Studies in American Indian languages: Description and theory, 204–211. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schauber, E.
    1975 Theoretical reponses to Navajo questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Slobin, Dan I & Ayhan A. Aksu
    1982 In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Use of the Turkish Evidential [Typological Studies in Language], 185–200. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
55. Watters, John Robert
    1979 Focus in Aghem. In Larry Hyman (ed.), Aghem grammatical structure, 137–197. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Willie, Mary Ann
    1991 Navajo pronouns and obviation. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Willie, Mary Ann
    1996 On the expression of modality in Navajo. In Eloise Jelinek (ed.), Athabaskan Language Studies: Essays in Honor of Robert W. Young, 331–347. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Witherspoon, Gary
    1977 Language and art in the Navajo universe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9705
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9705 [Google Scholar]
59. Young, Robert W. & William Morgan
    1987 The Navajo language. A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Young, Robert W. & William Morgan
    2000 The function and signification of certain Navaho particles. In Theodore B. Fernald & Paul R. Platero (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, 288–319. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]