Baker, Mark C. 2015. Case: Its principles and parameters

References

1. Artiagoitia, X.
   2003 Complementation (noun clauses). In José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque, 634–710. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Mark C.
   1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mark C.
   1996 The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark C.
   2002 The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, Mark C.
   2003 Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615047
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Mark C.
   2008 The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, Mark C. and Nadya Vinokurova
   2010 Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory28. 593–642.10.1007/s11049‑010‑9105‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9105-1 [Google Scholar]
8. Bobalijk, Jonathan
   2008 Where’s Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In David Adger , Daniel Harbour , and Susanna Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Joppen, Sandra and Dieter Wunderlich
   1995 Argument linking in Basque. Lingua97. 123–169.10.1016/0024‑3841(95)00025‑U
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00025-U [Google Scholar]
10. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    1993 Nominalizations. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Levin, Theodore and Omer Preminger
    2015 Case in Sahka: are two modalities really necessary?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33. 231–250.10.1007/s11049‑014‑9250‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9250-z [Google Scholar]
12. Marantz, Alec
    2000 Case and licensing. In Eric Reuland (ed.), Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s generalization, 11–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins10.1075/la.34.04mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.34.04mar [Google Scholar]
13. McFadden, Thomas
    2004 The position of morphological case in the derivation. University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Stiebels, Barbara
    2002 Typologie des Argumentlinkings: Ökonomie und Expressivität. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783050080178
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050080178 [Google Scholar]
15. Stiebels, Barbara
    2006 From rags to riches. Nominal linking in contrast to verbal linking. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), Advances in the theory of the lexicon, 167–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197815.167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197815.167 [Google Scholar]
16. Wunderlich, Dieter
    1997 Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry28. 27–68.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wunderlich, Dieter
    2003 Optimal case patterns: German and Icelandic compared. In Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 331–367. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]