1887
Volume 42, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Mark Baker (2015), Case: Its principles and parameters, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.16058.mal-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16058.mal
2018-06-06
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Werner
    2006 Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In: Kulikov, Leonid , Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds.), Studies on case, valency and transitivity, 115–146. John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.77.10abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.77.10abr [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark C.
    1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1996The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2003Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2008The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511619830
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobalijk, Jonathan
    2008 Where’s Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In David Adger , Daniel Harbour & Susanna Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, Noam
    2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin , David Michaels , and Juan Urigereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001 Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, ed., 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Comrie, Bernard
    1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalrymple, Mary and Irina Nikolaeva
    2011Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511993473
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473 [Google Scholar]
  11. Haspelmath, Martin & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie
    (eds.) 2005The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. de Hoop, Helen , and Andrej Malchukov
    2008 Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry39. 565–58710.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565 [Google Scholar]
  13. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2010 Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language34. 239–272.10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem [Google Scholar]
  14. Legate, Julie
    2008 Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry39.1. 55–10110.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  15. Levin, Theodore & Omer Preminger
    2015 Case in Sakha: are two modalities really necessary?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory33. 231–250.10.1007/s11049‑014‑9250‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9250-z [Google Scholar]
  16. MacWhinney, Brian , Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik
    (eds.) 2014Competing motivations in grammar and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Malchukov, Andrej & Andrew Spencer
    (eds.) 2009The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Malchukov, Andrej
    2008 Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua118, 203–221.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2015 Towards a typology of split ergativity: A TAM hierarchy for alignment splits. In Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina , Andrej Malchukov and Marc Richards (eds.), Scales and Hierarchies: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, 275–297. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marantz, Alec
    1991 Case and licensing. InProceedings of ESCOL ‘91, 175–195. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistic Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nichols, Johanna
    1992Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
    2010 Case. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, 52–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker
    2009 Case and alternative strategies: word order and agreement marking. In: Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 549–562. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sinnemäki, Kaius
    2008 Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Matti Miestamo , Kaius Sinnemäki , and Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. Studies in Language Companion Series94, 67–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.06sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.06sin [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16058.mal
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error