Reply to the Reviews of Case: Its Principles and Parameters

References

1. Baker, Mark
   2001 Phrase structure as a representation of “primitive” grammatical relations. In William Davies and Stan Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects: grammatical functions, functional categories and configurationality, 21–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0991‑1_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0991-1_2 [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Mark
   2014 On dependent ergative case (in Shipibo) and its derivation by phase. Linguistic Inquiry45.341–379.10.1162/LING_a_00159
   https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00159 [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mark
   2015 Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107295186
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295186 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark and Jonathan Bobaljik
   2017 On inherent and dependent theories of ergative case. In Jessica Coon , Diane Massam , and Lisa Travis (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, 111–134. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Comrie, Bernard
   1978 Ergativity. In Winfred Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology, 329–394. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Comrie, Bernard
   1981 Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deal, Amy Rose
   2016 Raising to ergative: Remarks on applicatives of unergatives. Ms. University of California Berkeley. To appear inLinguistic Inquiry50.2. Available atling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003024
   [Google Scholar]
8. Diesing, Molly
   1992 Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Heusinger, Klaus von , Udo Klein , and Dolgor Guntsetseg
   2011 The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian. Lingua121.48–59.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.006 [Google Scholar]
10. Marantz, Alec
    1991 Case and licensing. Paper presented at The 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Reinhart, Tanya
    1983 Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Valenzuela, Pilar
    2003 Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar. Eugene, Ore.: University of Oregon Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Vinokurova, Nadezhda
    2005 Lexical categories and argument structure: a study with reference to Sakha. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Vinokurova, Nadezhda
    2009 On raising and proleptic objects in Sakha. Unpublished ms., Rutgers University.