1887
Volume 41, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper discusses the analysis of a particular class of morphemes in the Oceanic language Äiwoo, and argues that the difficulties in accounting for them in traditional terms such as nominalisation, compounding, relative clauses, or classifiers is due to their status as bound lexical morphemes, also known as bound roots, an under-discussed category in linguistic literature. It proposes some parameters of variation within bound lexical morphemes as a class and shows that the Äiwoo facts can be best accounted for by reference to these parameters, both in terms of language-internal description and crosslinguistic comparability. It argues that understanding crosslinguistic morphological structure in terms of a dichotomy between “roots” and “affixes” underplays the existing variation in linguistic structure, and that a more detailed examination is necessary of forms which do not fit clearly into this dichotomy; the discussion of the Äiwoo data aims to provide a starting-point for such an examination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16087.nae
2018-03-30
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2000Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, Avery D.
    2007 Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition. Volume II: Complex constructions, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova
    2009 On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language85(3). 517–556. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0144
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0144 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Laurie
    2009 Typology of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 343–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickel, Balthasar
    2010 Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: the syntax and pragmatics interface, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.03bic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.03bic [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Peter K. Austin , Oliver Bond , David Nathan , & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistics Theory3, 3–13. London: SOAS.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Booij, Geert E. , Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan
    (eds.) 2000Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, Volume I. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bresnan, Joan
    1997 Mixed categories as head sharing constructions. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference, University of California, San Diego. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Accessed online: web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/LFG2-1997/lfg97bresnan.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bril, Isabelle
    2002Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: SELAF/Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2013 Ownership, part-whole, and other possessive-associative relations in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Possession and ownership, 65–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Citko, Barbara
    2004 On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory22(1). 95–126. doi: 10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0 [Google Scholar]
  13. Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
    2007 Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition. Volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbett, Greville G.
    2005 The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier , Adam Hodges & Davis S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.72.03cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.03cor [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, William
    2000 Lexical and grammatical meaning. In Geert R. Booij , Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, VolumeI, 257–263. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DeLancey, Scott
    1999 Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics65(1). 56–83. doi: 10.1086/466376
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466376 [Google Scholar]
  17. Early, Robert
    . A grammar of Lewo. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Epps, Patience
    2007 Birth of a noun classification system: the case of Hup. In W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), Language endangerment and endangered languages: linguistic and anthropological studies with special emphasis on the languages and cultures of the Andean-Amazonian border area, 107–127. Leiden: CNWS Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2008A grammar of Hup (Mouton Grammar Library 43). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199079
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199079 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 Between headed and headless relative clauses. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: a typological overview, 191–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.102.09epp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.102.09epp [Google Scholar]
  21. Foley, William A.
    2014 A comparative look at nominalizations in Austronesian. In I Wayan Arka & N. L. K. Mas Indrawati (eds.), Argument realisations and related constructions in Austronesian languages: papers from 12-ICAL, 1–51. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grinevald, Colette
    2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grinevald, Colette & Frank Seifart
    2004 Noun classes in African and Amazonian languages: towards a comparison. Linguistic Typology8(2). 243–285. doi: 10.1515/lity.2004.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2004 Maria’s ring of gold: adnominal possession and non-anchoring relations in European languages. In Ji-yung Kim , Yury A. Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: semantics and syntax, 155–181. Amherst, Mass: GLSA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1983 Relational classifiers. Lingua60. 147–176. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(83)90072‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90072-4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lieber, Rochelle & Joachim Mugdan
    2000 Internal structure of words. In Geert R. Booij , Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, VolumeI, 404–416. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer
    2009 Introduction: status and definition of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lynch, John , Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
    2002The Oceanic languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language60. 847–894. doi: 10.1353/lan.1984.0038
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0038 [Google Scholar]
  31. 1986 On the nature of noun incorporation. Language62. 32–37. doi: 10.1353/lan.1986.0096
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0096 [Google Scholar]
  32. 1999The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mithun, Marianne and Greville G. Corbett
    1999 The effect of noun incorporation on argument structure. In Lunella Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.180.05mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.180.05mit [Google Scholar]
  34. Moyse-Faurie, Claire
    2016 Referential markers in Oceanic nominalized constructions. In Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Finiteness and nominalization, 171–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mugdan, Joachim
    2015 Units of word-formation. In Peter O. Müller , Ingeborg Ohnheiser , Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: an international handbook of the languages of Europe, 235–301. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Næss, Åshild
    2006 Bound nominal elements in Äiwoo: a reappraisal of the “multiple noun class systems”. Oceanic Linguistics45(2). 269–296. doi: 10.1353/ol.2007.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2007.0006 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2015 Voice at the crossroads: symmetrical clause alternations in Äiwoo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. Oceanic Linguistics54(1). 270–307. doi: 10.1353/ol.2015.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2015.0000 [Google Scholar]
  38. , to appear. Plural-marking strategies in Äiwoo. Oceanic Linguistics57:1.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Olsen, Susan
    2014 Delineating derivation and compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 26–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Palmer, Bill & Dunstan Brown
    2007 Heads in Oceanic indirect possession. Oceanic Linguistics46(1). 199–209. doi: 10.1353/ol.2007.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2007.0022 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pirani, Laura
    2008 Bound roots in Mandarin Chinese and comparison with European «semi-words». In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20). Volume1, 261–277. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ross, Malcolm & Åshild Næss
    2007 An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands?Oceanic Linguistics46(2). 456–498. doi: 10.1353/ol.2008.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2008.0003 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1986 Some notes on noun incorporation. Language62. 19–31. doi: 10.1353/lan.1986.0077
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1986.0077 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spencer, Andrew
    2000 Morphology and syntax. In Geert R. Booij , Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, VolumeI, 312–334. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stassen, Leon
    2011 The problem of crosslinguistic identification. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 90–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sugita, Hiroshi
    1973 Semitransitive verbs and object incorporation in Micronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics12(1/2). 393–406. doi: 10.2307/3622861
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622861 [Google Scholar]
  47. van den Berg, René & Brenda H. Boerger
    2011 A Proto-Oceanic passive? Evidence from Bola and Natügu. Oceanic Linguistics50(1). 221–246. doi: 10.1353/ol.2011.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2011.0000 [Google Scholar]
  48. van Linden, An & Françoise Rose
    2017 How to distinguish between nouns and classifiers in Binominal Naming Constructions?Answers from two Amazonian languages. Conference presentation, 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, University of Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Whaley, Lindsay
    1997Introduction to typology: the unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781452233437
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233437 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wurm, Stephen A.
    1981 Notes on nominal classification systems in Äiwo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. In Andrew Gonzalez & David Thomas (eds.), Linguistics across continents: studies in honor of Richard S. Pittman, 123–142. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics and Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16087.nae
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.16087.nae
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bound roots , morphology , nominalisation and Oceanic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error