1887
Volume 42, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

By using data from nearly thirty languages of various families and regions, this paper examines the argument realization of three types of psychological verbs (i.e. causative bivalent, non-causative bivalent, and monovalent). It finds that, when compared with the argument realization of core transitive verbs like , causative bivalent psych verbs show crosslinguistic uniformity in that they pattern with core transitive verbs in argument realization. The same comparative approach finds that the argument realization of non-causative bivalent psych verbs shows a lot of crosslinguistic variation. As for monovalent psych verbs, the paper finds that they almost always pattern with the argument realization of unaccusative verbs. The findings of the paper are accounted for by using the Force-Control-Causality (FCC) model of verb meaning. Under this model, the uniformity in argument realization with respect to causative bivalent psych verbs is due to the prominence of the causative relationship expressed and the directionality of the causality from the Causer to the Causee. The variation in argument realization with respect to non-causative bivalent psych verbs can be attributed to the fact that such verbs express neither causation nor transmission of physical force. As for the near uniformity in argument realization with respect to monovalent psych verbs, it is due to the fact that they involve only one argument (thus no competition for the subject position) and this single argument shares the [−control] feature with the single argument of unaccusative verbs. This study points to the need of recognizing Causer and Causee as two core and highly-ranked thematic roles in a global thematic hierarchy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17016.li
2019-02-04
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arad, Maya
    1998 Psych-notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics10. 203–223.
  2. Atoyebi, Joseph
    2013 Yorùbá valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/yoruba (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Mark C.
    1989 Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry20. 513–553.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1997 Thematic roles and syntactic structure. InLiliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barðdal, Jóhanna
    2013 Icelandic valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/icelandic (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
    1988 Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory6. 291–352. 10.1007/BF00133902
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133902 [Google Scholar]
  7. 1991 Notes on psych-verbs, θ-theory, and binding. InRobert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, 132–162. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouchard, Denis
    1995The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen & Stephen Wechsler
    2016Lexical-Functional Syntax, 2nd edn.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bresnan, Joan & Jonni M. Kanerva
    1989 Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry20. 1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, Noam
    1970 Remarks on nominalization. InRoderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Comrie, Bernard
    1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Comrie, Bernard & Zaira Khalilova
    2013 Bezhta valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/bezhta (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Conners, Thomas J. & David Gil
    2013 Jakarta Indonesian valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/bezhta (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Creissels, Denis
    2013 Mandinka valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/mandinka (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Croft, William
    1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1993 Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. InJames Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, 55–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1972‑6_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_5 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1998 Event structure in argument linking. InMariam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 21–63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, Anthony R. & Jean-Pierre Koenig
    2000 Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language76. 56–91. 10.1353/lan.2000.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0068 [Google Scholar]
  21. DeLancey, Scott
    1984 Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language8(2). 181–213. 10.1075/sl.8.2.05del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.8.2.05del [Google Scholar]
  22. 1985 Agentivity and syntax. InWilliam H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber & Karen L. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–12. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dik, Simon C.
    1978Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, ed. byKees Hengeveld, 2nd rev. edn.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dowty, David
    1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language67. 547–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  26. Estrada-Fernández, Zarina, Mercedes Tubino Blanco & Jesús Francisco Villalpando Quiñonez
    2013 Yaqui valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/yaqui (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goddard, Cliff
    2013 English valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/english (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Grimshaw, Jane
    1990Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gruber, Jeffrey S.
    1965Studies in Lexical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1976Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gupta, Sagar Mal & Jyoti Tuladhar
    1979/1980 Dative subject constructions in Hindi, Nepali and Marathi and Relational Grammar. Contributions to Nepalese Studies7(1/2). 119–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
    (eds.) 2013Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/ (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Haspelmath, Martin & Luisa Baumann
    2013 German valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/german (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56. 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jackendoff, Ray
    1987 The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry18. 369–411.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
    2003 Not so quirky: On subject case in Icelandic. InEllen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New Perspectives in Case Theory, 127–163. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kász, Csilla
    2013 Modern Standard Arabic valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/arabic (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8(1). 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, Soung-U.
    2013 Korean valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/korean (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kishimoto, Hideki & Taro Kageyama
    2013 Japanese (standard) valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/japanese-standard (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Anthony R. Davis
    2001 Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy24. 71–124. 10.1023/A:1005616002948
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005616002948 [Google Scholar]
  43. Landau, Idan
    2010The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lehmann, Christian
    2013 Yucatec Maya valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/yucatec-maya (16March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Levin, Beth
    1999 Objecthood: An event structure perspective. InJohn P. Boyle & Aaron M. Griffith (eds.), Papers from the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1: The Main Session, 223–247. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Levin, Beth & Jason Grafmiller
    2013 Do you always fear what frightens you?InTracy Holloway King & Valeria de Paiva (eds.), From Quirky Case to Representing Space: Papers in Honor of Annie Zaenen, 21–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI Online Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
  48. Malchukov, Andrej
    2013 Even valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/even (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. McCawley, Noriko A.
    1976 On experiencer causatives. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, 181–203. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Næss, Åshild
    2007Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nedjalkov, Igor
    1997Evenki. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2013 Evenki valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/evenki (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nordhoff, Sebastian
    2013a Sri Lanka Malay valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/sri-lanka-malay (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (ed.) 2013bThe Genesis of Sri Lanka Malay: A Case of Extreme Language Contact. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Pankau, Andreas
    2016 Quirky subjects in Icelandic, Faroese, and German: A Relational Grammar account. InDoug Arnold, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King & Stefan Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 499–519. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pesetsky, David
    1995Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Primus, Beatrice
    1999Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110912463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110912463 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2006 Mismatches in semantic-role hierarchies and the dimensions of role semantics. InIna Bornkessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Bernard Comrie & Angela D. Friederici (eds.), Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological, and Psychological Perspectives, 53–87. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
    2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
  60. Reinhart, Tanya
    2001 Experiencing derivations. InRachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 11, 365–387. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2002 The Theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics28(3). 229–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rozwadowska, Bożena
    1988 Thematic restrictions on derived nominals. InWendy Wilkins (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 21: Thematic Relations, 147–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1989 Are thematic relations discrete?InRoberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds.), Linguistic Categorization, 115–130. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.61.09roz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.61.09roz [Google Scholar]
  64. 2017 Psychological verbs and psychological adjectives. InMartin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol.6, 2nd edn, 3383–3408. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom040
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom040 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schikowski, Robert, Balthasar Bickel & Netra Prasād Paudyāl
    2013 Chintang valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/chintang (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Seifart, Frank
    2013 Bora valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/bora (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Talmy, Leonard
    1976 Semantic causative types. InMayayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, 43–116. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science12. 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge & London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Tsujimura, Natsuko
    1991 On the semantic properties of unaccusativity. Journal of Japanese Linguistics13. 91–116. 10.1515/jjl‑1991‑0105
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1991-0105 [Google Scholar]
  72. Vajda, Edward J. & Elena Kryukova
    2013 Ket valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/ket (11March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Valentine, J. Randolph & Mary Ann Corbiere
    2013 Ojibwe valency patterns. InIren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. valpal.info/languages/ojibwe (12March 2016.)
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Van Valin, Robert D.
    1990 Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language66. 221–260. 10.2307/414886
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414886 [Google Scholar]
  75. Verhoeven, Elisabeth
    2010 Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology14. 213–251. 10.1515/lity.2010.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2010.009 [Google Scholar]
  76. Zaenen, Annie
    1993 Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. InJames Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, 129–161. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1972‑6_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_9 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17016.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17016.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argument realization , causative , Causee , Causer , psych verb and psychological verb
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error