1887
Volume 42, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article discusses gender agreement alternation in Aqusha Dargwa (Nakh-Daghestanian, the Caucasus, Russian Federation). The phenomenon is observed in periphrastic verbal forms with transitive verbs where gender agreement on the auxiliary can show the gender features of either the ergative subject or the absolutive direct object. Considering existing analyses of the phenomenon in terms of information structure, I argue that agreement alternation cannot be captured by sentence-topic-oriented accounts. I also discuss a structural proposal developed by Sumbatova and Lander (2014) and show that their analysis cannot be maintained in full. Instead, I propose a modified analysis according to which only subject agreement, but not object agreement, results from a cross-clausal referential dependency between the ergative subject of the lexical verb and the absolutive subject of the matrix restructuring verb. On this view, agreement alternation may be assimilated to the familiar distinction between ergative and biabsolutive constructions found elsewhere in Nakh-Daghestanian.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17018.gan
2018-10-19
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Werner
    2006 Introduction: Passivization and typology. Form vs. function – a confined survey into the research status quo. InWerner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and Typology: Form and function, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.68.03abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.03abr [Google Scholar]
  2. Belyaev, Oleg
    2016 Ergative gender agreement in Dargwa “backward control” or feature sharing?InDoug Arnold, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King, & Stefan Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 83–103. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 Information Structure Conditions on the Agreement Controller in Dargwa. InMiriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG’17 Conference, University of Konstanz, 66–82. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ebert, Cornelia & Stefan Hinterwimmer
    2010 The interpretation of topical indefinites as direct and indirect aboutness topics. InMalte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, 89–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Endriss, Cornelia
    2009Quantificational Topics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2303‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2303-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Forker, Diana
    2012 The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica46(1). 75–108.10.1515/flin.2012.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gagliardi, Annie, Michael Goncalves, Maria Polinsky, & Nina Radkevich
    2014 The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez. Lingua150. 137–170.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Givón, Talmy
    1983 Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. InTalmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3.01giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv [Google Scholar]
  10. Givón, Talmy
    2001Syntax: An introduction. VolumeII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  12. Krifka, Manfred
    2007 Basic Notions of Information Structure. InCaroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information StructureVolume 6: The notions of information structure, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2016 Quantification and information structure. InCaroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 251–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  15. Polinsky, Maria
    2016 Agreement in Archi from a minimalist perspective. InOliver Bond, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina, & Greville Corbett (eds.), Archi: complexities of agreement in cross-theoretical perspective, 184–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747291.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747291.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam
    2002 Backward Control. Linguistic Inquiry33(2). 245–82.10.1162/002438902317406713
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317406713 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2006 Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising. Syntax9(2). 171–192.10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2006.00090.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00090.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Potsdam, Eric & Maria Polinsky
    2012 Backward Raising. Syntax15(1). 75–108.10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2011.00158.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00158.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Reinhart, Tanya
    1981 Pragmatics and Linguistics. An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Philosophica27. 53–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1985 Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language61(4). 821–848.10.2307/414491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sumbatova, Nina R. & Yuri A. Lander
    2014Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: grammatičeskij očerk, voprosy sintaksisa. Moscow: Jazyki slav’anskoj kul’tury.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Szabolcsi, Anna
    1997 Strategies for Scope Taking. InAnna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 109–154. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5814‑5_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  23. van den Berg, Helma
    1999 Gender and person agreement in Akusha Dargi. Folia Linguistica33(1–2). 153–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2001Dargi folktales. Oral stories from the Caucasus. With an introduction to Dargi grammar. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. Universiteit Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2005 The East Caucasian language family. Lingua115(1–2). 147–190.10.1016/j.lingua.2003.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.06.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17018.gan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aqusha Dargwa , biabsolutive construction , gender agreement and sentence topic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error