1887
Volume 42, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface

 
978-1-107-46085-0

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17020.ope
2019-02-04
2019-08-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Corbett, Greville G.
    2005 The canonical approach in typology. InZygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.72.03cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.03cor [Google Scholar]
  2. 2009 Canonical inflectional classes. InFabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, 1–11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stump, Gregory
    2002 Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. InGeert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 147–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3726‑5_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_5 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17020.ope
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
Keyword(s): canonical typology , inflection , inflectional paradigms and paradigm linkage
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error