A typology of depiction marking

References

1. Akinaga, Kazue
   2001 Shinmeikai nihongo akusento jiten [A Shinmeikai dictionary of Japanese accent]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Akita, Kimi
   2015 Ideophones and reported discourse as depictive signs. Gengo Bunka Kyōdō Kenkyū Purojekuto 2014: Shizen Gengo e no Rironteki Apurōchi [Osaka University Joint Project on Language & Culture 2014: Theoretical Approaches to Natural Language]. 1–10.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Akita, Kimi
   2020 Modality-specificity of iconicity: The case of motion ideophones in Japanese. InPamela Perniss, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Operationalizing iconicity, 3–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.17.01aki
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.01aki [Google Scholar]
4. Akita, Kimi & Prashant Pardeshi
   (eds.) 2019 Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.16
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16 [Google Scholar]
5. Akita, Kimi & Takeshi Usuki
   2016 A constructional account of the “optional” quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics52(2). 245–275. 10.1017/S0022226715000171
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000171 [Google Scholar]
6. Alderete, John & Alexei Kochetov
   2017 Integrating sound symbolism with core grammar: The case of expressive palatalization. Language93(4). 731–766. 10.1353/lan.2017.0056
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0056 [Google Scholar]
7. Bodomo, Adams B.
   2006 The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The case of Dagaare and Cantonese. InJohn Mugane, John P. Hutchison & Dee A. Worman (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African languages and linguistics in broad perspectives, 203–213. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clark, Herbert H.
   2006 Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review123(3). 324–347. 10.1037/rev0000026
   https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026 [Google Scholar]
9. Clark, Herbert H.
   2019 Depicting in communication. InPeter Hagoort (ed.), Human language: From genes and brains to behavior, 235–247. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4). 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
11. Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
    Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (last access11 August 2020).
12. Diffloth, Gérard
    1972 Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 8. 440–447.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dingemanse, Mark
    2011 The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud UniversityPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dingemanse, Mark
    2015 Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language39(4). 946–970. 10.1075/sl.39.4.05din
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.05din [Google Scholar]
15. Dingemanse, Mark
    2017 Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals70(2). 119–141. 10.1515/stuf‑2017‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0018 [Google Scholar]
16. Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita
    2017 An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics53(3). 501–532. 10.1017/S002222671600030X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671600030X [Google Scholar]
17. Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morton H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
    2015 Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(10). 603–615. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013 [Google Scholar]
18. Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
    2018 Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology9. 716. 1–15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716 [Google Scholar]
19. Franco, Ludovico
    2017 L-syntax and phono-symbolism: On the status of ideophones in complex predicates. Canadian Journal of Linguistics62(2). 243–279. 10.1017/cnj.2017.7
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.7 [Google Scholar]
20. Güldemann, Tom
    2008 Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110211450
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450 [Google Scholar]
21. Güldemann, Tom
    2016 Maximal backgrounding = focus without (necessary) focus encoding. Studies in Language40(3). 551–590. 10.1075/sl.40.3.03gul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.3.03gul [Google Scholar]
22. Haiman, John
    2018 Ideophones and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107706897
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897 [Google Scholar]
23. Hamano, Shoko Saito
    1986 The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Gainesville, FL: University of FloridaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hamano, Shoko
    1998 The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala
    (eds.) 1994 Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hirose, Yukio
    1995 Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua95. 223–238. 10.1016/0024‑3841(94)00006‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)00006-8 [Google Scholar]
27. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
    2017 Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics62(2). 196–220. 10.1017/cnj.2017.8
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.8 [Google Scholar]
28. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    2014 Grammar of the internal expressive sentences in Japanese: Observations and explorations. InKaori Kabata & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds.), Usage-based approaches to Japanese grammar: Towards the understanding of human language, 55–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa [Google Scholar]
29. Kadooka, Ken-Ichi
    2007 Nihongo onomatope goi ni okeru keitaiteki/on’inteki taikeisei ni tsuite [On the morphological and phonological systematicity of Japanese ideophonic lexemes]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kageyama, Taro
    2007 Explorations in the conceptual semantics of mimetic verbs. InBjarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Smith (eds.), Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese, 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori & Lawrence Schourup
    1996 Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110809046
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809046 [Google Scholar]
32. Kita, Sotaro
    1997 Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics35(2). 379–415. 10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379 [Google Scholar]
33. Kita, Sotaro
    2001 Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics39(2). 419–436. 10.1515/ling.2001.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.017 [Google Scholar]
34. Klewitz, Gabriele & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    1999 Quote – unquote?: The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics9(4). 459–485. 10.1075/prag.9.4.03kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.4.03kle [Google Scholar]
35. Kubozono, Haruo
    1999 Mora and syllable. InNatsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 31–61. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kubozono, Haruo
    2019 The phonological structure of Japanese mimetics and motherese. InKimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), Ideophones, mimetics and expressives, 35–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.16.03kub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.03kub [Google Scholar]
37. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13). 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
38. Nasu, Akio
    2002 Nihongo onomatope no gokeisei to inritsu kōzō [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese ideophones]. Ibaraki: University of TsukubaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nuckolls, Janis B.
    1996 Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ohala, John J.
    1994 The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. InLeanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Peirce, Charles Sanders
    1932 Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol.2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2018 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sadanobu, Toshiyuki
    2015 Four types of linguistic resources for variable speaking units in common Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan19(2). 109–114.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sasamoto, Ryoko
    2019 Onomatopoeia and relevance: Communication of impressions via sound. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑26318‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26318-8 [Google Scholar]
45. Sells, Peter
    2017 The significance of the grammatical study of Japanese mimetics. InNoriko Iwasaki, Peter Sells & Kimi Akita (eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics: Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation, 7–19. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tanaka, Shin’ichi & Haruo Kubozono
    1999 Nihongo no hatsuon kyōshitsu: Riron to renshū [Introduction to Japanese pronunciation: Theory and practice]. Tokyo: Kurosio.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Thompson, Arthur Lewis & Youngah Do
    2019 Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1). 72. 1–40. 10.5334/gjgl.872
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.872 [Google Scholar]
48. Toratani, Kiyoko
    2018 Particle drop of mimetics in Japanese: A Discourse Grammar approach. Cognitive Linguistic Studies5(1). 39–60. 10.1075/cogls.00012.tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00012.tor [Google Scholar]
49. Usuki, Takeshi & Kimi Akita
    2015 What’s in a mimetic?: On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. InMasako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity: East meets West, 109–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Voeltz, Friedrich K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz
    (eds.) 2001 Ideophones. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44 [Google Scholar]
51. Westermann, Diedrich
    1927 Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. InFranz Boas (ed.), Festschrift Meinhof, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.
    [Google Scholar]