Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction

References

1. Auer, Peter
   2014 Sentences and their symbiotic guests. Notes on analepsis from the perspective of online syntax. Pragmatics24(3). 533–560. 10.1075/prag.24.3.05aue
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.05aue [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
4. Chafe, Wallace
   1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam
   1957 Syntactic Structures. London: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clancy, M. Patricia
   1980 Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. InWallace L. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Comrie, Bernard
   1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
   2014 What does grammar tell us about action. Pragmatics24(3). 623–648. 10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou [Google Scholar]
9. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Tsuyoshi Ono
   2007 Incrementing in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics17(4). 513–552. 10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, William
    1990 Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crystal, David
    1998 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois, John W.
    1987 The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language63. 805–855. 10.2307/415719
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415719 [Google Scholar]
13. Du Bois, John W.
    2014 Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
14. Etelämäki, Marja, Markku Haakana & Mia, Halonen
    2013 Keskustelukumppanin kehuminen suomalaisessa keskustelussa. [Complimenting in Finnish conversation.] Virittäjä117. 461–494.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
    2002 The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
    2013 Units and/or action trajectories? The language of grammatical categories and the language of social action. InBeatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of Talk – Units of Action, 13–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.25.02for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.02for [Google Scholar]
17. Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. InElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, eds., Interaction and grammar, 135–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
18. Fox, Barbara A.
    2007 Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies9. 299–318. 10.1177/1461445607076201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076201 [Google Scholar]
19. Fromkin, V., R. Rodman & N. Hyams
    2011 An Introduction to Language, 9th ed.Boston: Cengage Learning Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Givón, Talmy
    1984 Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17 [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. InGeorge Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goodwin, Charles
    1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Greenberg, Joseph
    (ed.) 1978 Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hakulinen, Auli & Fred, Karlsson
    1979 Nykysuomen lauseoppia. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
    2004 Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hakulinen, Auli & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2009 Designing utterances for action: Verb repeat responses to assessments. InMarkku Haakana, Minna Laakso & Jan Lindström (eds.), Talk in Interaction. Comparative Dimensions, 124–151. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010a Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
28. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010b The interplay between comparative concepts and descriptive categories (Reply to Newmeyer). Language86(3). 696–699. 10.1353/lan.2010.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0004 [Google Scholar]
29. Hayashi, Makoto
    1999 Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies22. 475–499. 10.1023/A:1005492027060
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060 [Google Scholar]
30. Hayashi, Makoto
    2003 Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
31. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
    2001 Syntax in the making: The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversational discourse (Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.9 [Google Scholar]
32. Hida, Yoshifumi
    2007 Bun. InYoshihide Endo, Masanobu Kato, Takeyoshi Sato, Kiyoto Hachiya & Tomiyoshi Maeda (eds.), Nihongogaku Kenkyu Jiten (Encyclopedia of Research in Japanese Linguistics). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hinds, John
    1980 Japanese conversation, discourse structure, and ellipsis. Discourse Processes, 263–286. 10.1080/01638538009544490
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544490 [Google Scholar]
34. Hinds, John
    1982 Japanese conversational structures. Lingua57(2–4). 301–326. 10.1016/0024‑3841(82)90007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(82)90007-9 [Google Scholar]
35. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
36. Hoye, Masako
    2008 Exploration of the notion of subject in Japanese. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Ph.D. dissertation.
37. Ikola, Osmo, Ulla Palomäki & Anna-Kaisa Koitto
    1989 Suomen murteiden lauseoppia ja tekstikielioppia. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    1993 The structure of the Intonation Unit in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics3. 39–53.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    2014 Grammar of the Internal Expressive Sentences in Japanese: Observations and Explorations. InKaori Kabata & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds.), Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar, 55–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa [Google Scholar]
40. Jahnsson, Adolf Waldemar
    1871 Finska språkets satslära. Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kärkkäinen, Elise & Tiina Keisanen
    2012 Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies14(5). 1–25. 10.1177/1461445612454069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612454069 [Google Scholar]
42. Kinsui, Satoshi
    1997 Kokubunpoo [Japanese grammar]. InTakashi Masuoka, Yoshio Nitta, Takao Gunji & Satoshi Kinsui (eds.), Bunpoo, 119–157. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kuno, Susumu
    1973 The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Laakso, Minna & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    2010 Cut-off or particle. Devices for initiating self-repair in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics42. 1151–1172. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar]
45. Laury, Ritva
    2018 The Finnish verb repeat response: Elliptical ‘fragment’, fixed expression, or independent unit?Journal of Pragmatics123. 139–150. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.003 [Google Scholar]
46. Laury, Ritva and Tsuyoshi Ono
    2014 The limits of grammar: Clause combining in Finnish and Japanese conversation, Pragmatics24(3). 561–592. 10.1075/prag.24.3.06lau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.06lau [Google Scholar]
47. Lerner, Gene
    1991 On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society20. 441–458. 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
48. Linell, Per
    2005 The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203342763
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763 [Google Scholar]
49. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Linell, Per
    2013 The dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building: Processes and resources. InBeatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of Talk – Units of Action, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.25.03lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.03lin [Google Scholar]
51. Martin, Samuel Elmo
    2004 (1975) A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
52. Masuoka, Takashi & Yukinori, Takubo
    1992 Kiso Nihongo Bunpoo: Kaiteiban [Basic Japanese grammar: A revised edition]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Matsumoto, Kazuko
    2003 Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation: Syntactic, Informational and Functional Structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.65
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.65 [Google Scholar]
54. Matthews, P. H.
    2014 (Online version) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics, 3 ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Maynard, Senko K.
    1989 Japanese Conversation: Self-contextualization Through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Maynard, Senko K.
    1990 Conversation Management in Contrast: Listener Response in Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics14. 397–412. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90097‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90097-W [Google Scholar]
57. Minami, Fujio
    1974 Gendai nihongo no koozoo [The Structure of Modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Nakayama, Toshihide
    2002 Nuuchahnulth (Nootka) Morphosyntax (UC Publications in Linguistics 134). Oakland: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Nakayama, Toshihide
    2013 Emergent nature of linguistic units. Workshop ‘Linguistic and interactional units in everyday speech: Cross-linguistic perspective’, University of Alberta.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Nitta, Yoshio
    2007 Ku. InEndo Yoshihide, Kato Masanobu, Sato Takeyoshi, Hachiya Kiyoto & Maeda Tomiyoshi (eds.), Nihongogaku Kenkyu Jiten [Encyclopedia of Research in Japanese Linguistics]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Okamoto, Shigeko
    1985 Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.
62. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Ryoko, Suzuki
    2018 The use of frequent verbs as reactive tokens in Japanese everyday talk: Formulaicity, florescence, and grammaticization. Journal of Pragmatics123. 209–219. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
63. Ono, Tsuyoshi and Sandra A. Thompson
    1995 What can conversation tell us about syntax?InPhilip W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the new linguistics, 213–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
    1997 Deconstructing “Zero Anaphora” in Japanese. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 481–491. 10.3765/bls.v23i1.1259
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1259 [Google Scholar]
65. Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson & Ryoko Suzuki
    2000 The Pragmatic Nature of the So-called Subject Marker ga in Japanese: Evidence from Conversation. Discourse Studies2(1). 55–84. 10.1177/1461445600002001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002001003 [Google Scholar]
66. Otsuki, Fumihiko
    1897 Koonihonbunten. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Hanshichi.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Payne, Thomas
    1997 Describing Morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805066 [Google Scholar]
68. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4). 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
69. Setälä, Eemil Nestor
    1926 [1880] Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki: Otava.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Shimojo, Mitsuaki
    2005 Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230505384
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505384 [Google Scholar]
71. Shopen, Timothy
    2007 Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2nd ed., vol.I, Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Minna Laakso
    2005 Katko vai eiku. Itselkorjauksen aloitustavat ja vuorvaikutustehtävät. Virittäjä109. 244–271.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Suzuki, Ryoko
    2016 Kaiwa ni okeru dooshi yurai no han’noo Hyogen: Aru to iru o chuushin ni [Reactive expressions of verb origin: with focus on aru and iru]. InYoko Fujii & Hiroko Takanashi (eds.), Komyunikeeshon no dainamizumu: Shizen hatsuwa deeta kara [Dynamics of Communication: Analyses of Natural Discourse]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Teramura, Hideo
    1982 Nihongo no Shintakusu to imi [Syntax and semantics of Japanese], vol.1. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2005 The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies7. 481–505. 10.1177/1461445605054403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403 [Google Scholar]
76. Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2015 Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139381154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]
77. Trask, Robert L.
    1997 A student’s dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Tuomikoski, Risto
    1969 Lauseiden ja virkkeiden terminologiasta. [Clause and sentence terminology in Finnish Grammars] Virittäjä73(1). 62–68.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Vatanen, Anna
    2014 Responding in overlap. Agency, epistemicity and social action in conversation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, PhD thesis.
80. Watanabe, Minoru
    1953 Jojutsu to chinjutsu: Jutsugo bunsetsu no koozoo [Predication and modality: The structure of predicates]. Kokugogaku13–14. 20–34.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Watanabe, Minoru
    1974 Kokugo Bunpooron [A Study of Japanese Grammar]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Yamada, Yoshio
    1924 Nihon Bunpoo Koogi [Lectures on Japanese Grammar], 3rd ed.Tokyo: Tokyo Hobunkan.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Yamada, Yoshio
    1978 Ku. Published in Nihon Bunpougaku Gairon (1936). Reprinted inShiro Hattori, Suzumu Oono, Atsuyoshi Sakakura & Akira Matsumura (eds.), Nihon no gengogaku 3 Bunpoo I (Linguistics in Japan vol. 3 Grammar I), 73–96. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]