1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Volume 43, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 43, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Bantu languages employ a combination of simple and compound verb forms to encode tense-aspect-mood distinctions. Compound constructions typically involve an auxiliary form followed by an inflected main verb. However, the six East African Bantu languages under examination in this paper exhibit a word order in which the auxiliary appears after the verb. This order is typologically unusual for languages with SVO word order and comparatively unusual in the context of the Bantu languages. This paper presents a synchronic description of this word order and develops an account of its possible origins. It is proposed that the verb-auxiliary order originated from a verb-fronting construction which was used historically to convey predication focus. The account further corroborates the claim that the progressive aspect is an inherently focal category in Bantu and, from a wider perspective, shows the interplay between the encoding of information structure and tense-aspect information.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
2020-01-23
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abels, Klaus & Peter Muriungi
    2008 The focus marker in Kîîtharaka: Syntax and semantics. Lingua, 687–731. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Gregory
    2006 Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2011 Auxiliary Verb Constructions in the Languages of Africa. Studies in African Linguistics40(1–2). 1409.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashton, Ethel O.
    1947 Swahili grammar, including intonation. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aunio, Lotta
    2015a Contact leading to a more complex tonal system: The case of Ikoma and Datooga in north-west Tanzania. Helsinki: University of Helsinki thesis.
  6. 2015b A typological perspective on Bantu nominal tone: The case of Ikoma-Nata-Isenye in western Tanzania. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies33(3). 359–371. 10.2989/16073614.2015.1105106
     https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2015.1105106 [Google Scholar]
  7. Aunio, Lotta, Holly Robinson, Tim Roth, Oliver Stegen & John B. Walker
    2019 The Mara languages (JE40). InKoen Bostoen, Derek Nurse, Gérard Philippson & Mark van de Velde (eds), The Bantu Languages, 2nd ed.501–532. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315755946‑17
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946-17 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bastin, Yvonne
    1989 El, prefijo locativo de la clase 18 y la expresión del progresivo presente en bantú (I). Estudios Africanos. Revista de la Asociación Española de Africanistas4(7). 61–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bennett, Patrick R.
    1985 Gikuyu ni Kioigire: essays, texts and glossaries. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison thesis.
  10. Bostoen, Koen & Gilles-Maurice de Schryver
    2015 Linguistic innovation, political centralization and economic integration in the Kongo kingdom: Reconstructing the spread of prefix reduction. Diachronica32. 139–185. 10.1075/dia.32.2.01bos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.01bos [Google Scholar]
  11. Bouka, L. Y.
    1989 Elements de description du kaamba. Parler bantou de la Republique Populaire du Congo (Groupe Koongo, HI7b). Brussels. Universite Libre de Bruxelles thesis.
  12. Botne, Robert
    1989 Reconstruction of a grammaticalized auxiliary in Bantu. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences. 19(2). 169–186.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 Specificity in Lusaamia infinitives. Studies in Language28(1). 137–164. 10.1075/sl.28.1.06bot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.1.06bot [Google Scholar]
  14. Brenzinger, Matthias
    2013 The twelve modern Khoisan languages. Paper presented at Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (Research in Khoisan Studies 29), Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 2014 Classifying the non-Bantu click languages. InLungisile Ntsebeza & Chris Sanders (eds), Papers from the Pre-Colonial Catalytic Project, vol.1, 80–102. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cammenga, Jelle
    2002 Phonology and Morphology of Ekegusii: A Bantu language of Kenya. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 Igikuria Phonology and Morphology: A Bantu language of South-West Kenya and North-West Tanzania. East-African languages and dialects. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell, Lyle
    1987 Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics53. 253–80. 10.1086/466058
     https://doi.org/10.1086/466058 [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Coetsem, Frans
    1988 Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110884869
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884869 [Google Scholar]
  21. Collins, Peter
    1991 Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203202463
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202463 [Google Scholar]
  22. Comrie, Bernard
    1976 Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahl, Östen
    1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. New York: Basil BlackwGell.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dom, Sebastian & Koen Bostoen
    2015 Examining variation in the expression of tense/aspect to classify the Kikongo language cluster. Africana Linguistica21. 163–211. 10.3406/aflin.2015.1045
     https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.2015.1045 [Google Scholar]
  25. Drubig, Hans B.
    2003 Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics41(1). 1–50. 10.1515/ling.2003.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language68(1). 81–138. 10.1353/lan.1992.0028
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0028 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunham, Margaret
    2005 Eléments de description du langi, langue Bantu F.33 de Tanzanie (Collection Langues et littératures de l’Afrique noire SELAF 413). Louvain: Peeters.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ehret, Christopher
    1986 Proposals on Khoisan reconstruction. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika7(2). 105–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Elderkin, Edward D.
    1986 Diachronic Inferences from basic sentence and noun Structure in Central Khoisan and Sandawe. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika7. 131–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 1989 The significance and origin of the use of pitch in Sandawe. York: University of York dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gibson, Hannah
    2012 Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A Dynamic Syntax perspective. London: SOAS University of London dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013 Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A case of contact-induced change?SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics16. 153–166.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016 A unified dynamic account of auxiliary placement in Rangi. Lingua184. 79–103. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2019 Auxiliary constructions in Bantu. Essex: University of Essex thesis.
  35. Gibson, Hannah & Lutz Marten
    2019 Probing the interaction of language contact and internal innovation: Four case studies of morphosyntactic change in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics49. 63–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJoseph H. Greenberg (ed), Universals of Language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Güldemann, Tom
    2003 Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu: A verbal category between semantics and pragmatics. Studies in Language27. 323–360. 10.1075/sl.27.2.05gul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.2.05gul [Google Scholar]
  38. 2005 “Complex predicates based on generic auxiliaries as an areal feature in Northeast Africa.” Studies in African linguistic typology64. 131–154. 10.1075/tsl.64.08gul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.64.08gul [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014 Khoisan language classification today. InTom Güldemann & Anne-Maria Feh (eds), Beyond ‘Khoisan’: Historical Relations in the Kalahari Basin, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Güldemann, Tom, and Rainer Vossen
    2000 “Khoisan.“ African languages: An introduction, 99–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gunnink, Hilde
    2016 The fronted-infinitive in few. Paper presented at6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University. 20–23rd June 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Guthrie, Malcolm
    1967–71 Comparative Bantu. Farnborough: Gregg.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Guy, Gregory
    1990 The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica7(1). 38–47. 10.1075/dia.7.1.04guy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.7.1.04guy [Google Scholar]
  44. Hadermann, Pascale
    1996 Grammaticalisation de la structure infinitive+verbé conjugue dans quelques langues bantoues. Studies in African Linguistics25(2). 155–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
    1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra
    2013 Introduction to Cleft structures. InKatharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds). Cleft Structures, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.208.01har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.208.01har [Google Scholar]
  47. Heine, Bernd
    1993 Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2005 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language27(3). 529–572. 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  49. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. InElizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  50. Hyman, Larry & John Watters
    1984 Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics15. 233–273.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Kerr, Elisabeth J.
    2017 Focus marking in Ekegusii. Cambridge: University of Cambridge thesis.
  52. Kießling, Roland
    2007 The “marked nominative” in Datooga. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics28(2). 149–191. 10.1515/JALL.2007.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/JALL.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kießling, Roland, Maarten Mous & Derek Nurse
    2008 The Tanzanian Rift Valley area. A Linguistic Geography of Africa. InBernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 186–227. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. de Kind, Jasper, Sebastian Dom, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen
    2015 Event-centrality and the pragmatics-semantics interface in Kikongo: From predication focus to progressive aspect and vice versa. Folia Linguistics Historica36. 113–163.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehmann, Christian
    2008 Information structure and grammaticalization. InElena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 77), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.12leh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.12leh [Google Scholar]
  57. Leslau, Wolf
    1945 The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word1. 59–82. 10.1080/00437956.1945.11659246
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1945.11659246 [Google Scholar]
  58. Maho, Jouni Filip
    1999 A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Marten, Lutz
    . Forthcoming. Bantu and Bantoid. InRainer Vossen ed. Handbook of African Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Marten, Lutz, Peter Edelesten, Rozenn Guérois & Hannah Gibson
    2018 Database of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Leverhulme Trust funded project ‘Morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: typology, contact and change’.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Meeussen, Achille Emille
    1967 Bantu Grammatical Reconstructions. Africana Linguistica3. 79–121. 10.3406/aflin.1967.873
     https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.1967.873 [Google Scholar]
  62. Morimoto, Yukiko
    2013 Gĩkũyũ. Unpublished ms. Paper presented to thePredicate-centered focus types: B7 project meeting, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Nov. 19, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 2016 Verb doubling vs. the conjoint/disjoint alternation. Paper presented at6th International Bantu conference, Helsinki University20–23rd June 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 2017 The Kikuyu focus marker nĩ: formal and functional similarities to the conjoint/disjoint alternation. InJenneke van der Wal & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), The conjoint/disjoint alternation in Bantu, 147–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Mous, Maarten
    1993 A grammar of Iraqw (Cushitic Language Studies 9). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2000 Counter-universal rise of infinitive-auxiliary order in Mbugwe (Tanzania, Bantu, F34.). InRainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner & Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 469–481. Köln: Köppe.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 2004 A grammatical sketch of Mbugwe: Bantu F34, Tanzania (Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 2016 Alagwa Grammar, Texts and Lexicon (Cushitic Language Series). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Ndumbu, J. M. G. & W. H. Whiteley
    1962 Some problems of stability and emphasis in Kamba one-word tenses. Journal of African Languages1(2). 167–180.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Nurse, Derek
    2000 Diachronic morphosyntactic change in Western Tanzania. InRainer Vossen, Angelika Mietzner and Antje Meissner (eds.), Mehr als nur Worte… : afrikanistische Beiträge zum 65. Geburtstag von Franz Rottland, 517–534. Köln: Köppe.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2003 Aspect and tense in Bantu languages. InDerek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages, 90–102. London, Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 2008 Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Nurse, Derek & Gérard Philippson
    2006 Common TA markers in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics27. 155–196. 10.1515/JALL.2006.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/JALL.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
  74. Philippson, Gérard and Derek Nurse
    2000 Gweno, a little known Bantu language of Northern Tanzania. Unpublished manuscrip.Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Paris / Dynamique du Langage, Lyon and Memorial University of Newfoundland.
  75. Riedel, Kristina
    2009 The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. Amsterdam: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Roth, Tim
    2014 The Case of Ngoreme: Distinguishing contact from inheritance in Mara Bantu. Paper presented atLanguage Contact: State of the Art, Helsinki, Finland.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2018 Aspect in Ikoma and Ngroreme: a comparison and analysis of two Western Serengeti Bantu languages. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
  78. Schachter, Paul
    1973 Focus and relativization. Language49(1). 19–46. 10.2307/412101
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412101 [Google Scholar]
  79. Schwarz, Florian
    2003a Focus marking in Kikuyu. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin thesis.
  80. 2003b Focus marking in Kikuyu. ZAS Papers in Linguistics30. 41–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2007 Ex-situ focus in Kikuyu. InEnoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Focus strategies in African languages: The interaction of focus and grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, 139–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Stegen, Oliver
    2002 Derivational processes in Rangi. Studies in African Linguistics31(1/2). 129–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2006 Participatory Research, TAM Functions, and Dialect Survey Among the Rangi. SIL, unpublished manuscript.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Takizala, Alexis
    1972 Focus and relativisation: The case of Kihung’an. Studies in African Linguistics3(2). 259–286.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufmann
    1988 Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley; University of California Press.
  86. van de Velde, Mark & Koen Bostoen
    2019 The Bantu languages, 2nd edn.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315755946
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946 [Google Scholar]
  87. van der Wal, Jenneke
    2016 Diagnosing focus. Studies in Language40(2). 259–301. 10.1075/sl.40.2.01van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.2.01van [Google Scholar]
  88. Walker, John B.
    2013 Comparative tense and aspect in the Mara Bantu languages: Towards a linguistic history. Langley City, CA: Trinity Western University thesis.
  89. Westphal, Ernst O. J.
    1971 The click languages of southern and eastern Africa. InThomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics 7: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, 367–420. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111562520‑013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111562520-013 [Google Scholar]
  90. Whiteley, Wilfred. H.
    1959 The tense system of Gusii. Kampala: East African Literature Bureau.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Wilhelmsen, Vera
    2014 Periphrastic verbs in Mbugwe (F34). Unpublished ms. Uppsala University.
  92. 2018 A description of the Mbugwe lanaguage – with a focus on tone and TAM. Uppsala: Uppsala University dissertation.
  93. Wright, Richard, Ian Maddieson, Peter Ladefoged & Bonny Sands
    1995 A phonetic study of Sandawe clicks. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics91. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
Loading
The grammaticalisation of verb-auxiliary order in East African Bantu
Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 43, 757 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17033.gib
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bantu; grammaticalisation; information structure; language contact; word order

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error