1887
Volume 42, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper makes a contribution to phonological typology by investigating the distribution of affricate-rich languages in Eurasia. It shows that affricate-rich and affricate-dense languages cluster areally within Eurasia and have area-specific histories. In particular, the affricate-rich areas of western Eurasia – a ‘European’ area and a Caucasian area – are not the result of contact-induced sound changes or borrowing, while the two affricate-rich areas of eastern Eurasia – the Hindukush area and the Eastern Himalayan area – are the result of contact. Specifically, affricate-dense areas depend on the emergence of retroflex affricates. Moreover, languages outside these affricate-dense areas tend to lose retroflex affricates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17043.nik
2018-10-19
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arsenault, Paul Edmond
    2012Retroflex consonant harmony in South Asia. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Backstrom, Peter C.
    1994A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Western Tibetan. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartee, Ellen Lynn
    2007A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxter, William Hubbard
    1992A handbook of Old Chinese phonology (Trends in linguistics 64). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110857085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857085 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1999 Reconstructing Proto-‘Mandarin’ retroflex initials. InRichard VanNess Simmons (ed.), Issues in Chinese dialect description and classification (Journal of Chinese linguistics: Monograph series 15), 1–35. Berkeley, California: Project on Linguistic Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2000 Did Proto-Mandarin exist?Journal of Chinese Linguistics28(1). 100–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel, Balthasar
    2007 Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology11(1). 239–251. doi: 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.018 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015 Distributional typology. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 901–923. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blevins, Juliette
    2009 Another universal bites the dust: Northwest Mekeo lacks coronal phonemes. Oceanic Linguistics48(1). 264–273. doi: 10.1353/ol.0.0033
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0033 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2017 Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107279872.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann
    2007 The evolution of auditory contrast (unpublished manuscript). www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/papers/ EvolutionOfContrast.pdf.
  12. Bradley, David
    1979Proto-Loloish (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies monograph series no. 39). London: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2017 Lisu. InR. P. E. Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev J. Handel, Cheng-Teh James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Leiden/Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell, Lyle
    2017 Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area?InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 19–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107279872.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlton, Terence R.
    1991Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ćavar, Malgorzata
    2011 Merger of the place contrast in the posterior sibilants in Croatian (unpublished manuscript).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Matthew Y.
    1976 From Middle Chinese to Modern Peking. Journal of Chinese Linguistics4(2/3). 113–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chirikba, Viacheslav
    1999 The West Caucasian material in ‘The North Caucasian etymological dictionary’ byS. L. Nikolayev and S. A. Starostin. InHelma van den Berg (ed.), Studies in Caucasian linguistics, 152–170. Leiden: CNWS Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chirkova, Ekaterina
    2014 Phonological profile of Kami, the Tibetan dialect of Muli (manuscript). InJackson T. -S. Sun (ed.), Special issue of Language and Linguistics on lesser known dialects of Tibetan. In press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chirkova, Katia
    2008 On the position of Baima within Tibetan: A look from basic vocabulary. InAlexander Lubotsky & Frederik Kortlandt (eds.), Evidence and counter-evidence: Essays in honour of Frederik Kortlandt. Volume 2: General linguistics, 69–91. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Denwood, Philip
    1999Tibetan (London Oriental and African language library v. 3). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/loall.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dwyer, Arienne M.
    2007Salar: A study in Inner Asian language contact processes (Turcologica 37). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Edelman, Dzhoi
    1980 K substratnomy naslediyu Tsentralnoaziatskogo yazykovogo soyuza [On the substrate heritage of the Central Asian linguistic area]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya5. 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1983The Dardic and Nuristani languages. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1986Sravnitelnaya grammatika vostochnoiranskikh yazykov. Fonologiya [Comparative grammar of East Iranian languages. Phonology]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Evans, Jonathan
    2004 The reconstruction of Proto-Qiang verb inflection. InYing-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T. -S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 201–238. Taipei: Instute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordon, Matthew & Ayla Applebaum
    2006 Phonetic structures of Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association36(2). 159. doi: 10.1017/S0025100306002532
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100306002532 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gordon, Matthew Kelly
    2016Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grawunder, Sven
    2017 The Caucasus. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 356–395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107279872.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.014 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gui, Ming Chao
    2001Yunnanese and Kunming Chinese: a study of the language communities, the phonological systems, and the phonological developments (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 28). München: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall, T. Alan
    1997 The historical development of retroflex consonants in Indo-Aryan. Lingua102(4). 203–221. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(96)00050‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00050-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Haller, Felix
    2004 Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen: sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialektes aus Nord-Amdo (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung Bd. 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
  33. Hamann, Silke
    2003The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes (LOT 75). Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hegedűs, Irén
    2012 The RUKI-rule in Nuristani. InBenedicte Nielsen Whitehead (ed.), The sound of Indo-European: phonetics, phonemics and morphophonemics (Copenhagen studies in Indo-European vol. 4), 145–168. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, University of Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hegedűs, Irén & Václav Blažek
    2010 On the position of Nuristani within Indo-Iranian. Paper presented at theconference Sound of Indo-European 2 (Opava, Oct 2010).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hill, Nathan W.
    2010 An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society108(2). 110–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01234.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01234.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Hongladarom, Krisadawan
    1996 Rgyalthang Tibetan of Yunnan: A preliminary report. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area19(2). 69–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Huber, Brigitte
    2005 The Tibetan dialect of Lende (Kyirong): A grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung Bd. 15). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
  39. Jacques, Guillaume
    2014 A phonological profile of Cone. InJackson T. -S. Sun (ed.), Phonological profiles of little-studied Tibetic varieties (Language and Linguistics monograph series 55), 269–330. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jacques, Guillaume & Alexis Michaud
    2011 Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze. Diachronica28(4). 468–498. doi: 10.1075/dia.28.4.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.4.02jac [Google Scholar]
  41. Janhunen, Juha
    1982 On the structure of Proto-Uralic. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen44. 23–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2003 Proto-Mongolic. InJuha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages (Routledge language family series 5), 1–29. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kogan, Anton
    2015 Nekotorye voprosy geneticheskoj klassifikacii dardskih jazykov po dannym istoricheskoj fonetiki [Some issues of the genealogical classification of the Dardic languages based on historical phonology]. Journal of Language Relationship13(12). 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Konow, Sten
    1936 Note on the ancient North-Western Prakrit. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies8(2–3). 603–612. doi: 10.1017/S0041977X00141230
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00141230 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kümmel, Martin
    2007Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kurpaska, Maria
    2010Chinese language(s): A look through the prism of the Great Dictionary of Modern Chinese Dialects (Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs 215). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110219159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219159 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
    1996The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2001 The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: problems in comparative linguistics, 225–254. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, Wai-Sum & Eric Zee
    2003 Standard Chinese (Beijing). Journal of the International Phonetic Association33(1). 109–112. doi: 10.1017/S0025100303001208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100303001208 [Google Scholar]
  50. Liljegren, Henrik
    2017 Profiling Indo-Aryan in the Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics4(1). 107–156. doi: 10.1515/jsall‑2017‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Liljegren, Henrik & Erik Svärd
    2017 Bisyndetic contrast marking in the Hindukush: Additional evidence of a historical contact zone. Journal of Language ContactOnline preprint. doi: 10.1163/19552629‑01002010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01002010 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lindblom, Björn & Ian Maddieson
    1988 Phonetic universals in consonant systems. InVictoria Fromkin, Larry M. Hyman & Charles N. Li (eds.), Language, speech, and mind: studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, 62–78. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Maddieson, Ian
    1984Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753459 [Google Scholar]
  54. Maddieson, Ian & Kristin Precoda
    1992UPSID and PHONEME (version 1.1). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Makley, Charlene, Keith Dede, Hua Kan & Wang Qingshan
    1999 The Amdo dialect of Labrang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area22(1). 97–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Matisoff, James A.
    2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction (University of California publications in linguistics v. 135). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Michael, Lev, Tammy Stark, Emily Clem & Will Chang
    (eds.) 2015South American phonological inventory database v1.1.4. Berkeley: University of California. linguistics.berkeley.edu/~saphon/.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Moran, Steven, Daniel McCloy & Richard Wright
    (eds.) 2014PHOIBLE online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. phoible.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Morén, Bruce
    2006 Consonant-vowel interactions in Serbian: Features, representations and constraint interactions. Lingua116(8). 1198–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  60. Nichols, Johanna
    1997 Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual review of anthropology26(1). 359–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.359
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.359 [Google Scholar]
  61. Niederer, Barbara
    1998Les langues Hmong-Mjen (Miáo-Yáo): phonologie historique (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 07). München: LINCOM EUROPA.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Nikolaev, Dmitry
    2018 The Database of Eurasian Phonological Inventories: A research tool for distributional phonological typology. Linguistics Vanguard4(1). doi: 10.1515/lingvan‑2017‑0050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0050 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nikolaev, Dmitry, Andrey Nikulin & Anton Kukhto
    (eds.) 2015The database of Eurasian phonological inventories (beta version). eurasianphonology.info/.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Norman, Jerry
    1974 The initials of Proto-Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics2(1). 27–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1988Chinese (Cambridge language surveys). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 1991 The Min dialects in historical perspective. InWilliam S. -Y. Wang (ed.), Languages and dialects of China (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 3), 323–358. Berkeley, California: Project on Linguistic Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Nugteren, Hans
    2011Mongolic phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu languages. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Petrović, Dragoljub & Snežana Gudurić
    2010Fonologija srpskoga jezika [Phonology of Serbian]. Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Ratliff, Martha Susan
    2010Hmong-Mien language history (Studies in language change 8). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Robbeets, Martine
    2017 The Transeurasian languages. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 586–626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107279872.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.023 [Google Scholar]
  71. Rochoń, Marzena
    2001 Coronal fricatives and affricates in Slavic languages. Paper presented atthe Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Shorto, Harry Leonard, Paul Sidwell, Doug Cooper & Christian Bauer
    2006A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary (Pacific linguistics 579). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Simmons, Richard VanNess
    1999Chinese dialect classification: A comparative approach to Harngjou, Old Jintarn, and common northern Wu. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.188
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.188 [Google Scholar]
  74. Starostin, Sergei
    2008 Altaic loans in Old Chinese. InAlicia Sanchez-Mazas, Roger Blench, Malcolm D. Ross, Ilia Peiros & Marie Lin (eds.), Past human migrations in East Asia: Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics (Routledge Studies in the Early History of Asia 5), 254–262. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Stolz, Thomas & Nataliya Levkovych
    2017 Convergence and divergence in the phonology of the languages of Europe. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 122–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781107279872.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.007 [Google Scholar]
  76. Sun, Jackson T. -S.
    2003 Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and linguistics4(4). 769–836.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 2006 Special linguistic features of gSerpa Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area29(1). 107–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2009 Tibetan dialects spoken in Shar khog and Khod po khog. East and West59(1/4). 273–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Tshering mTshomo
    2009 Preliminary analysis of the phonological history of Melung Tibetan. Language and Linguistics10(3). 521–537.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tenishev, Edgem R.
    1976Stroj salarskogo jazyka [Grammar of Salar]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Tikkanen, Bertil
    1988 On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in northwestern South Asia. Studia Orientalia64. 303–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 1999 Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. InRoger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and languages IV: Language change and cultural transformation, 138–148. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203208793_chapter_6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203208793_chapter_6 [Google Scholar]
  83. 2008 Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. InIsrar-ud-Din (ed.), Proceedings of the third international Hindu Kush cultural conference, 250–262. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Tsintsius, Vera
    1949Sravnitelnaya grammatika tunguso-manchzhurskikh yazykov [Comparative grammar of Tungus-Manchu languages]. Leningrad: Gosuchpedgiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Yan, Margaret Mian
    2006 Introduction to Chinese dialectology (LINCOM Studies in Asian linguistics 22). München: LINCOM Europa.
  86. Yu, Dominic
    2009Lizu and ProtoTibeto-Burman. Unpublished manuscript. University of Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang, Paiyu
    2013The Kilen language of Manchuria: Grammar of a Moribund Tungusic Language: University of Hong Kong dissertation. doi: 10.5353/th_b4985881
    https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b4985881 [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhivlov, Mikhail
    2014 Studies in Uralic vocalism III. Journal of Language Relationship12. 113–148.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17043.nik
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.17043.nik
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error