Criteria for establishing the inventory of semantic participants and voices in Tagalog

References

1. Apresjan, Juri D.
   1995 Lexical semantics (synonymic means of language) (In Russian: Лексическая семантика (синонимические средства языка)). Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apresjan, Juri D.
   2010 A prospectus of the active dictionary of Russian (In Russian: Проспект активного словаря русского языка). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskih kul’tur.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cena, Resty M.
   1971 Case opposition in Tagalog. The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics10. 133–148.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chang, Anna Hsiou-chuan
   2006 A Reference Grammar of Paiwan. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.
5. Cunningham, Margaret C. & Joan E. Goetz
   1963 Pronoun formatives in Amganad Ifugao. Manila: SIL. Goudswaard, Manila: Linguistic Society of Philippines and SIL.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Guzman, Videa P.
   1978 Syntactic derivation of Tagalog verbs (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Vos, Fiona
   2011 Essential Tagalog Grammar.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dowty, David
   1991 Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language67.3. 547–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
9. Foley, William A.
   1997 Anthropological Linguistics: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Foley, William A.
    1998 Symmetrical Voice Systems and Precategoricality in Philippine Languages. InMiriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference: Workshop on voice and grammatical functions in Austronesian languages, 45–59. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gallego, Maria Kristina S.
    2015 Ang mga Nominal Marker ng Filipino at Ivatan. Daluyan Journal ng Wikang Filipino, tomoXXI 2015 65–95.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2005 The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. InK. Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2008 Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. InSimon Musgrave & Peter K. Austin (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Functions in Austronesian Languages, 247–293. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hohulin, Richard M. & Elma Lou Hohulin
    2014 Tuwali Ifugao dictionary ang grammar sketch. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kess, Joseph Francis
    1967 Syntactic Features of Tagalog Verbs. University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.
16. Kittilä, Seppo & Fernando Zúñiga
    2016 Recent developments and open questions in the field of semantic roles. InSeppo Kittilä & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Advances in Research on Semantic Roles (Benjamins Current Topis 88), 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.88.01kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.88.01kit [Google Scholar]
17. Kroeger, Paul
    1993a Another look at subjecthood in Tagalog. Philippine Journal of Linguistics24.2. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kroeger, Paul
    1993b Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Latrouite, Anja
    2011 Voice and Case in Tagalog: The coding of prominence and orientation. Dusseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität PhD dissertation.
20. Malicsi, Jonathan C.
    2013 Gramar ng Filipino. Quezon City: Sentro ng Wikang Filipino.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Newell, Leonard E.
    2005 (1993) Batad Ifugao Dictionary with Ethnographic Notes. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rachkov, G. E.
    1981 Introduction to morphology of contemporary Tagalog (In Russian: Vvedenie v morfologiyu sovremennogo tagal’skogo yazyka). Leningrad State University.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ramos, Teresita V.
    1974 The Case System of Tagalog Verbs. Pacific Linguistics, Series B. No. 27. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Reid, Lawrence A.
    2005 Tagalog and Philippine languages. InPhilipp Skutch (ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Reid, Lawrence A.
    2008 Tagalog. InBernard Comrie (ed.), The World’s Major Languages (2nd edition), chapter 47. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Reid, Lawrence A. & Hsiu-chuan Liao
    2004 A Brief Syntactic Typology of Philippine Languages. Language and Linguistics5(2). 433–490.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ross, Malcolm & Stacy Fang-ching Teng
    2005 Formosan Languages and Linguistic Typology. Language and Linguistics6:4. 739–781.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schachter, Paul
    1961 Structural ambiguity in Tagalog. Language Learning11. 135–145. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1961.tb00751.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1961.tb00751.x [Google Scholar]
29. Schachter, Paul
    1976 The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schachter, Paul
    1977 Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. InP. Cole & J. M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 8: Grammatical Relations, 279–305. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Schachter, Paul
    1993 The Subject in Tagalog: Still None of the Above. UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Number 15. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schachter, Paul & Fe Otanes
    1972 Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley, & Lawrence A. Reid
    2009 The evolution of focus in Austronesian [Unabridged version of paper published in 1982]. InElizabeth Zeitoun (ed.), Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C6), vol.2, 329–481. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tanaka, Nozomi
    2016 An asymmetry in the acquisition of Tagalog relative clauses. PhD dissertation. Manoa: University of Hawai’i.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wolff, John U.
    1973 Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. InAndrew Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in honor of Cecilio Lopez on his seventy-fifth birthday, 71–91. Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]