1887
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper describes the semantic and morphosyntactic properties of general converb constructions in Andi, a language of the Avar-Andic group of the East Caucasian language family. There are two general converbs in Andi, both of which are homophonous with a finite verb form (the aorist and the perfect, respectively). There is a considerable functional overlap between the two converbs. Both can be used to render the first stage of a complex event. The perfect / converb can also specify manner. An additive particle often accompanies the perfect as converb, while a specialised particle appears with the aorist as converb. The situation in Andi is unusual, because the two converbs are functionally very similar and not opposed in terms of aspect. In addition, Andi seems to be the only East Caucasian language where a specialised particle (i.e. ) is found in this type of converbal clauses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.18026.ver
2019-06-12
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alisultanova, Mesedu A.
    (transl.) & Patimat A. Magomedova (ed.) 2010Dunjalla baχunnirsːi χalɢilƛol ɢʷanab mits’ːillasːol muχal [World fairy tales in Andi]. Makhachkala: Nural iršad.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Belyaev, Oleg
    2018 Aorist, resultative and perfect in Shiri Dargwa and beyond. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 80–119. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, Helma van den
    2004 Coordinating constructions in Daghestanian languages. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 197–226. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.58.12ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.12ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cercvadze, Ilja I.
    1965 Andijskij jazyk (Rezjume) [The Andi language (Summary) (in Russian)]. In Ilja Cercvadze , 4Andiuri ena [The Andi language (in Georgian)], 311–392. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
  6. Comrie, Bernard , Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova
    2012 Adverbial clauses in the Tsezic languages. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 157–190. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110280692.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.157 [Google Scholar]
  7. Creissels, Denis
    2009 Participles and finiteness: the case of Akhvakh. Linguistic Discovery7.1. 106–130. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.334
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.334 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2012 External agreement in the converbal construction of Northern Akhvakh. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 127–156. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110280692.127
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.127 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2008 Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF – Language typology and Universals61(4). 309–325. 10.1524/stuf.2008.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0027 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dirr, Adolf M.
    1906 Kratkij grammatičeskij očerk andijskago jazyka [A grammar sketch of Andi] Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemën Kavkaza [Collection of materials for the description of places and tribes of the Caucasus]. Tbilisi: Upravlenie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dwyer, Arienne
    2000 Direct and indirect experience in Salar. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 45–59. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805284.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.45 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eulenberg, Alexander , Konstantin Kazenin , A. Solovjeva & Sergej Tatevosov
    1996 Adjunct clauses. In Alexandr E. Kibrik , Sergej G. Tatevosov & Alexander Eulenberg (eds.), Godoberi, 197–209. München / Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Forker, Diana
    2016 Toward a typology for additive markers. Lingua180. 69–100. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  14. Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev
    2016 Word order and focus particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 239–262. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995a The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–56. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1995b Contextual and specialized converbs in Lezgian. Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.) Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 415–440. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalinina, Elena & Nina Sumbatova
    2007 Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations, 183–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kalinina, Elena Ju. & Svetlana Ju. Toldova
    1999 Atributivizacija [Attributivization]. In Alexandr E. Kibrik & Jakov G. Testelets (eds.), Élementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osvečšenii [Elements of Tsakhur in a typological perspective], 377–419. Moscow: Nasledie.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kazenin, Konstantin I.
    2001 Deepričastnye konstrukcii [Gerundial constructions]. Alexandr E. Kibrik , Konstantin I. Kazenin , Jekaterina A. Ljutikova & Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds.), Bagvalinskij jazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari [The Bagvalal language. Grammar. Texts. Dictionary], 554–594. Moscow: Nasledie.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kazenin, Konstantin I. & Yakov G. Testelets
    2004 Where coordination meets subordination: Converb constructions in Tsakhur (Daghestanian). In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 227–240. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.58.13kaz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.13kaz [Google Scholar]
  21. Khalilova, Zaira A.
    2011 Evidentiality in Tsezic languages. Linguistic Discovery9(2). 30–48. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.393
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.393 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kibrik, Alexandr E. & Sandro V. Kodzasov
    1990Sopostavitel’noe izučenie Dagestanskix jazykov. Imja. Fonetika [Comparative study of Daghestanian languages. Nouns. Phonetics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kibrik, Andrei A.
    1985 Absentiv-Aorist un Resultativ in der andischen Sprache. In Heinz Fähnrich (ed.), Sprachen Europas und Asiens, 55–66. Jena: Friedrich Schiller Universität.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. König, Ekkehard
    1995 The meaning of converb constructions. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 57–96. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lindstedt, Jouko
    2000 The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365–384. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maisak, Timur
    . To appear. Structural and functional variations of the perfect in the Lezgic languages. In Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd eds. The perfect volume. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2018 The aorist/perfect distinction in Nizh Udi. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 120–165. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Maisak, Timur A.
    2016 Glagol’naja sistema rikvaninskogo govora andijskogo jazyka: formoobrazovanie [The verbal system of the Rikvani dialect of Andi: conjugation]. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. October 2016 (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2017 Éndoklitiki vnutri glagola: teper’ i v andijskom [Endoclitics inside the verb: now also in Andi]. Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters]. Insititute of Contemporary Linguistic Research (MPGU) / Institute of Linguistics RAS. Moscow. 25–27.10.2017. (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Molochieva, Zarina
    2010 Tense, aspect and mood in Chechen. Leipzig: University of Leipzig dissertation.
  31. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
    1995 Some typological parameters of converbs. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 97–136. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
    1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.12.06ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned [Google Scholar]
  33. Nichols, Johanna
    2011Ingush grammar. Berkley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nichols, Johanna & David A. Peterson
    2010 Contact-induced spread of the rare Type 5 clitic. LSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore. 07.01.2010. (Extended abstract) 10.3765/exabs.v0i0.487
    https://doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.487 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rochant, Neige
    2016 Subordinate particles in Zilo dialect of Andi. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. November 2016 (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rochant, Neige & Samira Verhees
    2017 The (auxiliary) verb b-iʁidu in Andi. Historical Linguistics of the Caucasus. École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris. 12–14.04.2017. (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Salimov, Xangerej S.
    2010 (1968)Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka [The Gagatli dialect of Andi]. Makhachkala: Institut Jazyka, Literatury I Iskusstva imeni G. Cadasy.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sulejmanov, Jakub G.
    1957 Grammatičeskij očerk andijskogo jazyka. Na materiale govora s. Rikvani [A sketch of the grammar of Andi. Based on material from the dialect of the village Rikvani]. Moscow: Institut Jazykoznanija Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR Moskva dissertation.
  39. Tatevosov, Sergei
    2001 From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics33(3). 443–464. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00012‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00012-6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Verhees, Samira
    2018 The perfect in Avar and Andi. Cross-linguistic variation among two closely-related East Caucasian languages. In Dalila Ayoun , Agnès Celle & Laure Lansari (eds.), Tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 261–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.197.12ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.12ver [Google Scholar]
  41. Lukašdi bosam rerhanoɬːi χabar [Gospel of Luke (in Andi)]. Moscow: Institute for Bible Translation 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.18026.ver
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.18026.ver
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): additive , Andi , East Caucasian and general converb
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error