General converbs in Andi

References

1. Alisultanova, Mesedu A.
   (transl.) & Patimat A. Magomedova (ed.) 2010 Dunjalla baχunnirsːi χalɢilƛol ɢʷanab mits’ːillasːol muχal [World fairy tales in Andi]. Makhachkala: Nural iršad.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Belyaev, Oleg
   2018 Aorist, resultative and perfect in Shiri Dargwa and beyond. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 80–119. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berg, Helma van den
   2004 Coordinating constructions in Daghestanian languages. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 197–226. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.58.12ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.12ber [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
   1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cercvadze, Ilja I.
   1965 Andijskij jazyk (Rezjume) [The Andi language (Summary) (in Russian)]. In Ilja Cercvadze , 4Andiuri ena [The Andi language (in Georgian)], 311–392. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
6. Comrie, Bernard , Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova
   2012 Adverbial clauses in the Tsezic languages. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 157–190. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110280692.157
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.157 [Google Scholar]
7. Creissels, Denis
   2009 Participles and finiteness: the case of Akhvakh. Linguistic Discovery7.1. 106–130. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.334
   https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.334 [Google Scholar]
8. Creissels, Denis
   2012 External agreement in the converbal construction of Northern Akhvakh. In Volker Gast & Holger Diessel (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective, 127–156. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110280692.127
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.127 [Google Scholar]
9. Creissels, Denis
   2008 Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF – Language typology and Universals61(4). 309–325. 10.1524/stuf.2008.0027
   https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0027 [Google Scholar]
10. Dirr, Adolf M.
    1906 Kratkij grammatičeskij očerk andijskago jazyka [A grammar sketch of Andi] Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemën Kavkaza [Collection of materials for the description of places and tribes of the Caucasus]. Tbilisi: Upravlenie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dwyer, Arienne
    2000 Direct and indirect experience in Salar. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 45–59. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805284.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.45 [Google Scholar]
12. Eulenberg, Alexander , Konstantin Kazenin , A. Solovjeva & Sergej Tatevosov
    1996 Adjunct clauses. In Alexandr E. Kibrik , Sergej G. Tatevosov & Alexander Eulenberg (eds.), Godoberi, 197–209. München / Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Forker, Diana
    2016 Toward a typology for additive markers. Lingua180. 69–100. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008 [Google Scholar]
14. Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev
    2016 Word order and focus particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 239–262. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995a The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–56. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995b Contextual and specialized converbs in Lezgian. Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.) Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 415–440. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kalinina, Elena & Nina Sumbatova
    2007 Clause structure and verbal forms in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations, 183–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kalinina, Elena Ju. & Svetlana Ju. Toldova
    1999 Atributivizacija [Attributivization]. In Alexandr E. Kibrik & Jakov G. Testelets (eds.), Élementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osvečšenii [Elements of Tsakhur in a typological perspective], 377–419. Moscow: Nasledie.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kazenin, Konstantin I.
    2001 Deepričastnye konstrukcii [Gerundial constructions]. Alexandr E. Kibrik , Konstantin I. Kazenin , Jekaterina A. Ljutikova & Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds.), Bagvalinskij jazyk. Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari [The Bagvalal language. Grammar. Texts. Dictionary], 554–594. Moscow: Nasledie.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kazenin, Konstantin I. & Yakov G. Testelets
    2004 Where coordination meets subordination: Converb constructions in Tsakhur (Daghestanian). In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 227–240. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.58.13kaz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.13kaz [Google Scholar]
21. Khalilova, Zaira A.
    2011 Evidentiality in Tsezic languages. Linguistic Discovery9(2). 30–48. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.393
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.393 [Google Scholar]
22. Kibrik, Alexandr E. & Sandro V. Kodzasov
    1990 Sopostavitel’noe izučenie Dagestanskix jazykov. Imja. Fonetika [Comparative study of Daghestanian languages. Nouns. Phonetics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kibrik, Andrei A.
    1985 Absentiv-Aorist un Resultativ in der andischen Sprache. In Heinz Fähnrich (ed.), Sprachen Europas und Asiens, 55–66. Jena: Friedrich Schiller Universität.
    [Google Scholar]
24. König, Ekkehard
    1995 The meaning of converb constructions. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 57–96. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lindstedt, Jouko
    2000 The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365–384. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Maisak, Timur
    . To appear. Structural and functional variations of the perfect in the Lezgic languages. In Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd eds. The perfect volume. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Maisak, Timur
    2018 The aorist/perfect distinction in Nizh Udi. In Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages, 120–165. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Maisak, Timur A.
    2016 Glagol’naja sistema rikvaninskogo govora andijskogo jazyka: formoobrazovanie [The verbal system of the Rikvani dialect of Andi: conjugation]. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. October 2016 (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
29. Maisak, Timur A.
    2017 Éndoklitiki vnutri glagola: teper’ i v andijskom [Endoclitics inside the verb: now also in Andi]. Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters]. Insititute of Contemporary Linguistic Research (MPGU) / Institute of Linguistics RAS. Moscow. 25–27.10.2017. (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
30. Molochieva, Zarina
    2010 Tense, aspect and mood in Chechen. Leipzig: University of Leipzig dissertation.
31. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
    1995 Some typological parameters of converbs. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 97–136. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
    1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.12.06ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned [Google Scholar]
33. Nichols, Johanna
    2011 Ingush grammar. Berkley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Nichols, Johanna & David A. Peterson
    2010 Contact-induced spread of the rare Type 5 clitic. LSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore. 07.01.2010. (Extended abstract) 10.3765/exabs.v0i0.487
    https://doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.487 [Google Scholar]
35. Rochant, Neige
    2016 Subordinate particles in Zilo dialect of Andi. Andi working seminar. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow. November 2016 (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rochant, Neige & Samira Verhees
    2017 The (auxiliary) verb b-iʁidu in Andi. Historical Linguistics of the Caucasus. École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris. 12–14.04.2017. (Handout)
    [Google Scholar]
37. Salimov, Xangerej S.
    2010 (1968) Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka [The Gagatli dialect of Andi]. Makhachkala: Institut Jazyka, Literatury I Iskusstva imeni G. Cadasy.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sulejmanov, Jakub G.
    1957 Grammatičeskij očerk andijskogo jazyka. Na materiale govora s. Rikvani [A sketch of the grammar of Andi. Based on material from the dialect of the village Rikvani]. Moscow: Institut Jazykoznanija Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR Moskva dissertation.
39. Tatevosov, Sergei
    2001 From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics33(3). 443–464. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00012‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00012-6 [Google Scholar]
40. Verhees, Samira
    2018 The perfect in Avar and Andi. Cross-linguistic variation among two closely-related East Caucasian languages. In Dalila Ayoun , Agnès Celle & Laure Lansari (eds.), Tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 261–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.197.12ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.12ver [Google Scholar]
41. Lukašdi bosam rerhanoɬːi χabar [Gospel of Luke (in Andi)]. Moscow: Institute for Bible Translation 2015.
    [Google Scholar]