Expression of spontaneous motion events in Stieng

References

1. Bisang, Walter
   1995 Verb serialization and converbs-differences and similarities. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms – adverbial participles, gerunds, 137–188. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bisang, Walter
   1996 Areal Typology and Grammaticalization: Processes of Grammaticalization Based on Nouns and Verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian Languages. Studies in Language20.519–597. 10.1075/sl.20.3.03bis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.3.03bis [Google Scholar]
3. Bon, Noëllie
   2014 Une grammaire de la langue stieng : langue en danger du Cambodge et du Vietnam. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Borillo, Andrée
   1998 L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdin, Philippe
   1997 On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Palek, Bohumil (ed.), Proceedings of LP ‘96: Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, proceedings of the conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996, 185–216. Prague: Charles University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bowerman, Melissa , Marianne Gullberg , Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan
   2004 Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field Manual, vol9, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bowerman, Melissa & Stephen C. Levinson
   2001 Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620669
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620669 [Google Scholar]
8. Bradley, David
   2007a Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia. In Osahito Miyaoka , Osamu Sakiyama & Michael E. Krauss (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific rim. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bradley, David
   2007b Language endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language diversity endangered (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 181), 278–302. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burenhult, Niclas
    2012 The linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Jahai. In Anetta Kopecka , & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 21–36. 10.1075/tsl.100.05bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100.05bur [Google Scholar]
11. Chafe, Wallace
    1975 Eliciting narratives through a film: Pear Stories. chafe.faculty.linguistics.ucsb.edu/pearfilm.htm (Last access: 10 April 2020)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chafe, Wallace
    1980 The Pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: ABLEX publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Creissels, Denis
    2006 Syntaxe générale une introduction typologique 2: la phrase. Hermes Science Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DeLancey, Scott
    2005 Adpositions as a non-universal category. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier , Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.72.10del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.10del [Google Scholar]
15. General Statistics Office of Viet Nam
    General Statistics Office of Viet Nam 2009 National census of Vietnam. www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=9813 (Last access: 28 March 2020).
16. Fortis, Jean-Michel , Colette Grinevald , Anetta Kopecka & Alice Vittrant
    2011 L’expression de la trajectoire : perspectives typologiques. Faits de Langues3. (Les Cahiers). 33–42. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000004 [Google Scholar]
17. Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
    2011 L’organisation morpho-syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues3. (Les Cahiers). 71–98. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000006 [Google Scholar]
18. Grinevald, Colette
    2011 On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langues3. (Les Cahiers). 43–70. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000005 [Google Scholar]
19. Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson
    1996 Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ikegami, Yoshihiko
    1987 Source vs. Goal: a case of linguistic dissymetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Imbert, Caroline
    2008 Dynamique des systèmes et motivations fonctionnelles dans l’encodage de la Trajectoire. Description typologique du grec homérique et du vieil-anglais. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ishibashi, Miyuki
    2010 The (a)symmetry of source and goal in motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In Giovanna Marotta , Alessandro Lenci , Linda Meini & Francesco Rovai (eds.), Space in language: Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Pisa: PDE.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ishibashi, Miyuki
    2012 The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.100.17ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100.17ish [Google Scholar]
24. Ishibashi, Miyuki , Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
    2006 Trajectoire: matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Paris: Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
    2011 L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues3. (Les Cahiers). 131–149. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000009 [Google Scholar]
26. Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
    2005 Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition96. 1–33. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009 [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Charles N. , et Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1976 Subject and Topic: a new Typology of Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1974 Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Verbs or prepositions?Journal of Chinese Linguistics2. 257–278.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mayer, Mercer
    1969 Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]
31. National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning
    National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning 2007 General Population Census of Cambodia, 2008: enumerator manual. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. camnut.weebly.com/uploads/2/0/3/8/20389289/2009_census_2008.pdf (Last access: 28 March 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Papahagi, Cristina
    2011 Pour une typologie des systèmes d’adnominaux de la trajectoire. Faits de Langues3. (Les Cahiers). 117–130. 10.1163/19589514‑038‑02‑900000008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-038-02-900000008 [Google Scholar]
33. Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng
    2007 Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science31. 705–719. 10.1080/15326900701399954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954 [Google Scholar]
34. Sidwell, Paul
    2009 Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: history and state of the art. München: Lincom Europa Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Slobin, Dan I.
    2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates – Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Stathis Selimis
    2002, Motion verbs + manner, linguist list issue 13.899, https://linguistlist.org/issues/13/13-899/ (last access: 11/12/2020)
    [Google Scholar]
37. Starosta, Stanley
    1985 Relator Nouns as a Source of Case Inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications20. 111–133.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
    2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Güter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Svorou, Soteria
    1986 On the evolutionary paths of locative expressions. Berkeley Linguistics Society12. 515–527. 10.3765/bls.v12i0.1861
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v12i0.1861 [Google Scholar]
40. Svorou, Soteria
    1994 The grammar of space. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.25 [Google Scholar]
41. Talmy, Leonard A.
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Talmy, Leonard A.
    2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ungerer, Friedrich & Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    1996 An Introduction to cognitive linguistics. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vandeloise, Claude
    1986 L’espace en français : sémantiques des prépositions spatiales. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Zlatev, Jordan , Peerapat Yangklang , Sven Stromqvist & Ludo Verhoeven
    2004 A third way to travel: The place of Thai (and other serial verb languages) in motion event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 159–190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates – Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]