The relative pronoun strategy

References

1. Biagui, Noël B. & Nicolas Quint
   2013 Casamancese Creole structure dataset. InSusanne M. Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.), Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atapics-online.info/contributions/34, accessed on13 June 2018).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bright, William
   1957 The Karok language. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cantarino, Vicente
   1975 Syntax of Modern Arabic prose: The compound sentence. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carroll, Matthew J.
   2016 The Ngkolmpu language (with special reference to distributed exponence). Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.
5. Cohen, Eran
   2016 The modern Hebrew prepositional relative clause strategy. Studies in Language40. 733–764. 10.1075/sl.40.4.01coh
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.4.01coh [Google Scholar]
6. Comrie, Bernard
   1998 Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics1. 59–85.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Comrie, Bernard
   2006 Syntactic typology: Just how exotic ARE European-type relative clauses?InRicardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic Universals, 130–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618215.007
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618215.007 [Google Scholar]
8. Comrie, Bernard & Tania Kuteva
   2013a Relativization on subjects. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/122, Accessed on6 April 2018).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Comrie, Bernard & Tania Kuteva
   2013b Relativization on objects. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/122, accessed on6 April 2018).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crowley, Terry, John Lynch, Jeff Siegel & Julie Piau
    1995 The design of language: An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Auckland: Longman Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Döhler, Christian
    2018 A grammar of Komnzo. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 22). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Evans, Nicholas, Wayan Arka, Matthew Carroll, Yun Jung Choi, Christian Döhler, Volker Gast, Eri Kashima, Emil Mittag, Bruno Olsson, Kyla Quinn, Dineke Schokkin, Philip Tama, Charlotte van Tongeren & Jeff Siegel
    2017 The languages of Southern New Guinea. InBill Palmer (ed.), The Languages and Linguistics of New Guinea: A Comprehensive Guide, 641–774. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295252‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295252-006 [Google Scholar]
13. Fiorentino, Giuliana
    2007 European relative clauses and the uniqueness of the Relative Pronoun Type. Rivista di Linguistica19. 263–291.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
    2012 Relative clauses in Yucatec Maya: Light heads vs. Null domain. InBernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 253–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.102.12gut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.102.12gut [Google Scholar]
15. Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo & Jorge Monforte
    2009 Focus, agent focus and relative clauses in Yucatec Maya. InHeriberto Avelino, Jessica Coon & Elisabeth Norcliffe (eds.), New perspectives in Mayan linguistics, 83–96. Cambridge MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001a The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. InMartin Haspelmath, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 1492–1510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492 [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001b Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects (Typological Studies in Language 46), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.46.04has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.46.04has [Google Scholar]
18. Heath, Jeffrey
    1999 A grammar of Koyra Chiini. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804850
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804850 [Google Scholar]
19. Kossmann, Maarten
    1997 Grammaire du parler berbe’re de Figuig (Maroc oriental). Louvain, Paris: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Michaelis, Susanne M., Martin Haspelmath & the APiCS Consortium
    2013 Subject relative clauses. InSusanne M. Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Available online athttp://apics-online.info/parameters/92#2/13.9/10.2, accessed on13 June 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mulder, Jean G.
    1994 Ergativity in Coast Tsimshian (Sm’algyax). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Price, Mavis
    2000 Alphabet development workshop for sociolinguistic orthography [Nama]. ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick & Jeffrey L. Elman
    2007 Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language57. 347–379. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Siegel, Jeff
    2014 The morphology of tense and aspect in Nama, a Papuan language of southern New Guinea. Open Linguistics1. 211–231.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Siegel, Jeff
    2017 Transitive and intransitive verbs in Nama, a Papuan language of southern New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics56. 123–142. 10.1353/ol.2017.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0005 [Google Scholar]
26. Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2018 Ethnologue: Languages of the world (21st edition). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: www.ethnologue.com
    [Google Scholar]
27. Williams, F. E.
    1936 Papuans of the Trans-Fly. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]