Volume 43, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this paper, we offer the first detailed description of expressions of possibility in the Oceanic languages Daakaka and Saliba-Logea. We show that in these languages basic expressions of possibility are bi-clausal. This suggests that, depending on their intended scope, typological studies of modal expressions may need to consider grammaticalized bi-clausal structures which have typically been excluded in studies of this domain based on their structural complexity. Relevant features to consider bi-clausal constructions as basic, grammaticalized expressions of possibility include their frequency, semantic specificity, and paradigmatic relationship with other modal expressions. The findings presented here are based on the analysis of original corpus data and targeted fieldwork.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Akatsuka, Noriko
    1992 Japanese modals are conditionals. InDiane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. Mccawley, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.55.02aka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.55.02aka [Google Scholar]
  2. van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian
    1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbour, Julie
    2011 Exploring mood in Neverver. Oceanic Linguistics50(1). 198–220. 10.1353/ol.2011.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2011.0012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth A.
    2016 Building meaning in Navajo. Boston: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. thesis.
  5. Bugenhagen, Robert D.
    1993 The semantics of irrealis in the Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea. InGer P. Reesink (ed.), Topics in descriptive Austronesian linguistics, 1–39. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burton, Strang & Lisa Matthewson
    2015 Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. InRyan Bochnak, & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 135–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, J. L., Revere Perkins & W. Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan
    2003 19 mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. InBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan L.
    1998 “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics40(2). 257–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cleary-Kemp, Jessica
    2014 Irrealis as verbal non-specificity in Koro (Oceanic). Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February. 20–41. 10.3765/bls.v40i0.3131
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v40i0.3131 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cole, Peter
    1982Imbabura Quechua (Lingua Descriptive Studies, no. 5). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cristofaro, Sonja
    2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward
    1988A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Donaldson, Tamsin
    1980Ngiyambaa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Druskat, Stephan
    2018 (Jan.). ToolboxTextModules (Version 1.1.0).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Durie, Mark
    1985A grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, Nicholas D.
    2003 Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101 203–34. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00118
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00118 [Google Scholar]
  18. Givón, Talmy
    1980 The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language4. 333–377. 10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv [Google Scholar]
  19. Givon, Talmy
    1994 Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language18. 265–337. 10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv [Google Scholar]
  20. Hacquard, Valentine
    2009 On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy32. 279–315. 10.1007/s10988‑009‑9061‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9061-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hengeveld, K.
    2004 Illocution, mood and modality. InG. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A handbook on inflection and word-formation, 1190–1201. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, Paul J.
    2003Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, A. H.
    1986 Semi-clausal modals in Korean verb morphology. Linguistics Colloquium talk, University of Oregon, Eugene.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Krause, Thomas & Amir Zeldes
    2016 ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities31(1). 118–139. 10.1093/llc/fqu057
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu057 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    2008A grammar of Toqabaqita (Mouton Grammar Library), vol.42. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199062
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199062 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2016 Modality and mood in Oceanic. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, 330–361. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Margetts, Anna
    1999Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea (Series in Psycholinguistics), vol.12. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Margetts, Anna, Andrew Margetts & Carmen Dawuda
    2017 Saliba/Logea. The Language Archive. dobes.mpi.nl/projects/saliba
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Matisoff, James A.
    1986 Hearts and minds in South-East Asian languages and English: an essay in the comparative lexical semantics of psycho-collocation. Cahiers de Linguistique d’Asie orientale15(1). 5–57. 10.3406/clao.1986.1191
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1986.1191 [Google Scholar]
  31. McEnery, Anthony & Richard Xiao
    2004The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese. www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/corpus/LCMC/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mosel, Ulrike
    1994Saliba (Languages of the World/Materials), vol.31. München: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Musgrave, Jill
    2007A grammar of Neve’ei, Vanuatu. Canberra: Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Narrog, Heiko
    2009Modality in Japanese: The layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2016 The expression of non-epistemic modal categories. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, 89–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nauze, Fabrice
    2008Modality in typological perspective. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Noonan, Michael
    1985 Complementation. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.2, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Palmer, Bill
    2007 Imperfective aspect and the interplay of aspect, tense, and modality in Torau. Oceanic Linguistics46(2). 499–519. 10.1353/ol.2008.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2008.0000 [Google Scholar]
  39. Palmer, F. R.
    2001Mood and modality, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  40. von Prince, Kilu
    2013Daakaka, the language archive. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2015A grammar of Daakaka. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2017 Dozing eyes and drunken faces: Nominalized psych-collocations in Daakaka. Studies in Language. 502–520. 10.1075/sl.41.2.08von
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.2.08von [Google Scholar]
  43. 2018a Fat pig (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. doi:  10.5281/zenodo.1231798
  44. 2018b Festival (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1231804
  45. 2018c Red yam (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1231808
  46. . Bananas. (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1230385
  47. 2017 Daakaka dictionary. Dictionaria. https://dictionaria.clld.org/contributions/daakaka, 1–2171.
  48. von Prince, Kilu, Ana Krajinović, Manred Krifka, Valérie Guérin & Michael Franjieh
    2018 Mapping irreality: Storyboards for eliciting tam contexts. InAnja Gattnar, Robin Hörnig & Melanie Störzer (eds.), Proceedings of linguistic evidence 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rolka, Matthew & Seth Cable
    2010 Tom and Mittens. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved fromwww.totemfieldstoryboards.org (Accessed21 Sep 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schaaik, Gerjan van
    1985 Verb based terms and modality in Turkish. Unpublished paper, University of Amsterdam.
  51. Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
    2014 Complement clauses and complementation systems: A cross-linguistic study of grammatical organization. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Ph.D. thesis.
  52. Stiebels, Barbara
    2007 Towards a typology of complement control. ZAS Papers in Linguistics47. 1–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sulkala, Helena & Merja Karjalainen
    1992Finnish. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. TFS Working Group
    TFS Working Group 2010 The fortune teller. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved fromwww.totemfieldstoryboards.org (Accessed21 Sep 2017).
  55. TFS Working Group
    TFS Working Group 2011a Chore girl. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved fromwww.totemfieldstoryboards.org (Accessed21 Sep 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  56. TFS Working Group
    TFS Working Group 2011b The woodchopper. Totem Field Storyboards. Illustrated byKatie Sardinha. Retrieved fromwww.totemfieldstoryboards.org (Accessed21 Sep 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Vander Klok, Jozina
    2013 Bill vs. the weather. Totem field storyboards. Retrieved fromwww.totemfieldstoryboards.org (Accessed31 May 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Verhoeven, Elisabeth
    2007Experiential constructions in Yucatec Maya: A typologically based analysis of a functional domain in a Mayan language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. 10.1075/slcs.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.87 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wolf, Lavi
    2014 Degrees of assertion. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Humanities and Social.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zipser, Florian & Laurent Romary
    2010 A model oriented approach to the mapping of annotation formats using standards. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Resource and Language Technology Standards.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): grammaticalization; modality; Oceanic; possibility
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error