The dual nature of irrealis in complementation

References

1. Ammann, Andreas & Johan van der Auwera
   2004 Complementizer-headed main clauses for volitional moods in the languages of South-Eastern Europe: A Balkanism?InOlga Mišeska Tomić (ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics, 293–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Auwera, Johan van der & Ewa Schalley
   2004 From optative and subjunctive to irrealis. InFrank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis & Bart Vandenabeele (eds.), Seduction, Community, Speech. A Festschrift for Herman Parret, 87–96. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.127.08auw
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.127.08auw [Google Scholar]
3. Browne, Wayles
   1997 Verbal forms with da in Slovenian complement, purpose and result clauses. InNeka mu e večna slavata. Studies Dedicated to the Memory of Zbigniew Gołąb = Balkanistica10, 72–80.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, Joan S.
   1998 ‘Irrealis’ as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics40(2). 257–271.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bybee, Joan S., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
   1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chafe, Wallace
   1995 The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian Languages, and English. InJoan S. Bybee & Susan Fleischman (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 349–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.15cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.15cha [Google Scholar]
7. Cleary-Kemp, Jessica
   2014 Irrealis as verbal non-specificity in Koro (Oceanic). Berkeley Linguistics Society40, 20–41. 10.3765/bls.v40i0.3131
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v40i0.3131 [Google Scholar]
8. Cristofaro, Sonia
   2012 Descriptive notions vs. Grammatical categories: Unrealized states-of-affairs and ‘irrealis’. Language Sciences34(2). 121–146. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.001 [Google Scholar]
9. Croft, William
   1983 Quantifier scope ambiguity and definiteness. Berkeley Linguistics Society9. 25–36.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dik, Simon C. & Kees Hengeveld
    1991 The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics29(2). 221–259. 10.1515/ling.1991.29.2.231
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.2.231 [Google Scholar]
11. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dobrušina, Nina
    2016 Soslagatel’noe naklonenie v russkom jazyke. Opyt issledovanija grammatičeskoj semantiki [The Subjunctive in Russian. An Investigation into Grammatical Semantics]. Prague: Animedia.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Elliott, Jennifer
    2000 Realis and Irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology4(1). 55–90. 10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55 [Google Scholar]
14. Gildersleeve, Basil L.
    1900 Syntax of Classical Greek from Homer to Demosthenes. New York: American Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haan, Ferdinand de
    2012 Irrealis: Fact or fiction?Language Sciences34(2). 107–130. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016 [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    1998 The semantic development of old presents: New futures and subjunctives without grammaticalization. Diachronica15(1). 29–62. 10.1075/dia.15.1.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.03has [Google Scholar]
18. Haspelmath
    2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
19. Hodgson, William B.
    1881 Errors in the Use of English. Edinburgh: David Douglas.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Holvoet, Axel
    2007 Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jespersen, Otto
    1933 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Partiv. Syntax (ThirdVolume). London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kehayov, Petar & Kasper Boye
    2016a Complementizer semantics – an introduction. In: Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds), Complementizer Semantics in European Languages, 1–11. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110416619‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110416619-004 [Google Scholar]
23. Kehayov, Petar & Kasper Boye
    2016b Complementizer semantics in European languages: Overview and generalizations. InKasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer Semantics in European Languages, 809–878. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110416619‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110416619-023 [Google Scholar]
24. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lillo, Antonio
    2017 On the oblique optative in Herodotus’ completive sentences: An evidentiality mark in Ancient Greek. InFelicia Logozzo & Paolo Pocett (eds.), Ancient Greek Linguistics. New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, 313–324. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551754‑325
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551754-325 [Google Scholar]
26. Lunn, Patricia V.
    1989 Spanish mood and the prototype of assertability. Linguistics27(4), 687–702. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.4.687
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.4.687 [Google Scholar]
27. Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò
    2012 The reality status of directives and its coding across languages. Language Sciences34(2), 147–170. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.002 [Google Scholar]
28. Mithun, Nancy
    1995 On the relativity of irreality. InJoan S. Bybee & Susan Fleischman (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 367–388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.16mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.16mit [Google Scholar]
29. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2016 Analyses of the semantics of mood. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, 68–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Palmer, F. R.
    2001 Mood and Modality, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
31. Ransom, Evelyn
    1986 Complementation: Its Meanings and Forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.10 [Google Scholar]
32. Rijksbaron, Albert
    1994 The Syntax and Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek, 2nd edn.Amsterdam: Gieben.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sičinava, Dmitrij V.
    2004 K probleme proisxoždenija slavjanskogo uslovnogo naklonenija [On the problem of the origin of the Slavic conditional]. InJurij A. Lander, Vladimir A. Plungjan & Anna Ju. Urmančieva (eds.), Irrealis i irreal’nost’ [Irrealis and Irreality], 292–312. Moskva: Gnozis.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Squartini, Mario
    2010 Mood in Italian. InBjörn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the Languages of Europe, 237–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.120.13squ
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.13squ [Google Scholar]
36. Szucsich, Luka
    2010 Mood in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. InBjörn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the Languages of Europe, 394–408. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.120.22szu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.22szu [Google Scholar]
37. Švedova, Natalija Ju
    (ed.) 1980 Russkaja grammatika [Russian Grammar] i–ii. Moskva: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Thieroff, Rolf
    2010 Moods, moods, moods. InBjörn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the Languages of Europe, 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.120.01thi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.01thi [Google Scholar]