Differential nominal marking in Circassian

References

1. Abney, Steven P.
   1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
2. Aguilar-Guevara, Ana , Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
   (eds.) 2014 Weak Referentiality. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.219
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219 [Google Scholar]
3. Aissen, Judith
   2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21(3). 435–448. 10.1023/A:1024109008573
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573 [Google Scholar]
4. Alexiadou, Artemis
   2014 Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.211
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.211 [Google Scholar]
5. Arkadiev, Peter
   2006 Dvuxpadežnye sistemy v indoiranskix jazykax: Tipologičeskaja perspektiva (=Two-term case systems in the Indo-Iranian languages: A typological perspective). In: M. N. Bogoljubov (red.), Indoiranskoe jazykoznanie i tipologija jazykovyx situacij. Sbornik statej k 75-letiju professora A.L. Grjunberga (1930–1995) (=Indo-Iranian linguistics and the typology of linguistic situations. Studies for the 75th anniversary of Professor A.L. Grjunberg), 74–92. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arkadiev, Peter M. & Yury A. Lander
   . Forthcoming. The North-West Caucasian languages. To Appear. In Maria Polinsky ed. The Oxford Handbook of the Languages of the Caucasus.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Arkadiev, Peter M. & Alexander B. Letuchiy
   2011 Prefixes and suffixes in the Adyghe polysynthetic wordform: Types of interaction. In Vittorio S. Tomelleri , Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds.), Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus, 495–514. München, Berlin: Otto Sagner.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bagirokova, Irina , Yury Lander & Paul Phelan
   . Submitted. Number in West Circassian. In Paolo Acquaviva & Michael Daniel eds. Number in the World’s Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baker, Mark
   2011 On the syntax of surface-adjacency: The case of pseudo noun incorporation. Ms., Rutgers University.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke
    (eds.) 2015 The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation. (Syntax & Semantics Vol. 40). Leiden, Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004291089
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291089 [Google Scholar]
11. Bossong, Georg
    1985 Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bossong, Georg
    1998 Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et Valence dans les Language de l’Europe, 193–258. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gryuter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Caponigro, Ivano & Maria Polinsky
    2011 Relative embeddings: A Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics interface. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 29(1). 71–122. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9121‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9121-9 [Google Scholar]
14. Comrie, Bernard
    1979 “Definite” and “animate” direct objects: a natural class?Linguistica Silesiana3. 13–21.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
    2011 Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511993473
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473 [Google Scholar]
16. Dayal, Veneeta
    2011 Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 29(1). 123–167. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9118‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4 [Google Scholar]
17. de Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov
    2007 On fluid differential case marking: a bidirectional OT account. Lingua117. 1636–1656. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.010 [Google Scholar]
18. de Hoop, Helen & Andrej Malchukov
    2008 Case marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry39(4). 565–587. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.565 [Google Scholar]
19. de Hoop, Helen & Peter de Swart
    (eds.) 2009 Differential Subject Marking (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 72). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6497‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5 [Google Scholar]
20. de Swart, Peter
    2007 Cross-linguistic Variation in Object Marking. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1979 Ergativity. Language55(1). 59–138. 10.2307/412519
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412519 [Google Scholar]
22. Dodyxudoeva, Lejla R.
    2000 Pamirskie jazyki [The Pamir languages]. In: Rastorgueva, Vera S. (eds.) Jazyki mira. Iranskie jazyki. III. Vostočnoiranskie jazyki. [Languages of the World. Iranian languages. III. The East Iranian languages], 170–174. Moskva: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2013 Definite articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/37, Accessed on2018-08-11.)
    [Google Scholar]
24. Du Bois, John
    2003 Argument structure: Grammar in use. In John Du Bois , Lorraine Kumpf & William Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for Function, 11–60. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.14.04dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.04dub [Google Scholar]
25. Edel’man, Džoj I.
    1966 Jazguljamskij jazyk (=The Yazghulāmī Language). Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Enç, Mürvet
    1991 The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry22(1). 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fajzov, M.
    1966 Jazyk rušancev sovetskogo Pamira (=The Language of the Rošani of the Soviet Pamir). Dušanbe: Akademija Nauk Tadžikskoj SSR.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fauconnier, Stephanie & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
    2014 A and O as each other’s mirror image? Problems with markedness reversal. Linguistic Typology18(1). 3–49. 10.1515/lingty‑2014‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2014-0002 [Google Scholar]
29. Gorbet, Larry Paul
    1976 A Grammar of Diegueño Nominals. New York, London: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Grossman, Eitan
    2014 Case in Coptic: what’s ‘coded’?Paper from theWorkshop on ‘Case and Agreement: Between Grammar and Pragmatics’. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hardy, Donald E.
    1988 The Semantics of Creek Morphosyntax. Houston, TX: Rice University PhD Thesis.
32. Hardy, Donald E.
    2005 Creek. In Heather K. Hardy & Janine Scancarelli (eds.), Native Languages of the Southeastern United States, 200–245. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Haspelmath, Martin
    2008 Frequency and iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics19(1). 1–33. 10.1515/COG.2008.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.001 [Google Scholar]
34. Haspelmath, Martin
    2018 Are we making progress in understanding Differential Object Marking?Diversity Linguistics Comment. https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1119
    [Google Scholar]
35. Haspelmath, Martin
    2019 Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004047
36. Hewitt, B. George
    1979 Abkhaz. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2010 Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language34(2). 239–272. 10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem [Google Scholar]
38. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2011 Towards a typological study of differential object marking and differential object indexation. Tesi di dottorato, Università degli studi di Pavia.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kamali, Beste
    2008 Phases of incorporation and a three-way distinction for direct objects (in Turkish). Talk given at the5th Workshop of Altaic Formal Linguistics. SOAS. London.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kjuseva, Maria & Svetlana Pavlova
    2015 Vyraženie lokativnyx značenij v glagolax dviženija v kubanskom dialekte kabardinskogo jazyka [The expression of spatial meanings with verbs of motion in Kuban dialect of Kabardian]. Fieldwork report, Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
41. König, Christa
    2008 Case in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Korotkova, Natalia A. & Yury A. Lander
    2010 Deriving suffix ordering in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe. Morphology20. 299–319. 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9185‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9185-y [Google Scholar]
43. Kumaxov, Muxadin A.
    1971 Slovoizmenenie adygskix jazykov [=Inflection in the Circassian languages]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kumakhov, Mukhadin A. & Karina Vamling
    2009 Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö: Malmö University.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lander, Yury A.
    2012 Reljativizacija v polisintetičeskom jazyke: adygejskie otnositelʹnye konstrukcii v tipologičeskoj perspektive [Relativization in a polysynthetic language: Adyghe relative clauses in typological perspective]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities PhD Dissertation.
46. Lander, Yury A.
    2017 Nominal complex in West Circassian: Between morphology and syntax. Studies in Language41(1). 76–98. 10.1075/sl.41.1.03lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.03lan [Google Scholar]
47. Lander, Yury A. & Alexander B. Letuchiy
    2010 Kinds of recursion in Adyghe morphology. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and Human Language, 263–284. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219258.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219258.263 [Google Scholar]
48. Lander, Yury A. & Yakov G. Testelets
    2017 Adyghe. In Michael Fortescue , Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis, 948–970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Leonetti, Manuel
    2004 Specificity and object marking: the case of Spanisha. Catalan Journal of Linguistics3. 75–114. 10.5565/rev/catjl.106
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.106 [Google Scholar]
50. Letučij, Aleksandr B.
    2009 Affiksy benefaktiva i malefaktiva: sintaksi­če­skie osobennosti i krug upotreblenij [Benefactive and malefactive markers: Syntactic peculiarities and range of uses]. InYakov G. Testelets (ed.), Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Studies in the grammar of West Circassian], 329–371. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Letuchiy, Alexander B.
    2012 Ergativity in the Adyghe system of valency-changing derivations. In Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), Ergativity, Valency and Voice, 323–354. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110227734.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227734.323 [Google Scholar]
52. Luqo, Inǰīl
    2001 Luqo Inǰīl (=The Gospel of Luke in Shughnī). Moscow: Instituti tarǰumā Kitobi Muqadas.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lyutikova, Ekaterina A.
    2017 Agreement, case and licensing: Evidence from Tatar. Ural-Altaic Studies25. 25–45.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Malchukov, Andrej & Peter de Swart
    2009 Differential case marking and actancy variations. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 339–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Massam, Diane
    2001 Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory19(1). 153–197. 10.1023/A:1006465130442
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006465130442 [Google Scholar]
56. Massam, Diane
    2009 Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass3(4). 1076–1096. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00140.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00140.x [Google Scholar]
57. Mazurova, Julia V.
    2009 Semantika lokativnyx preverbov pə- i ṣ̂we- [Semantics of the locative preverbs pə- i ṣ̂we-]. InYakov G. Testelets (ed.), Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Studies in the grammar of West Circassian], 429–453. Мoscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Miller, Amy
    2001 A Grammar of Jamul Tiipay (Mouton Grammar Library 23). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110864823
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864823 [Google Scholar]
59. Miner, Kenneth L.
    1986 Noun Stripping and Loose Incorporation in Zuni. International Journal of American Linguistics52. 242–254. 10.1086/466021
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466021 [Google Scholar]
60. O’Herin, Brian
    2002 Case and Agreement in Abaza. Arlington: SIL International & University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Öztürk, Balkız
    2005 Case, Referentiality and Phrase Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.77
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.77 [Google Scholar]
62. Payne, John
    1980 The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages. Lingua51. 147–186. 10.1016/0024‑3841(80)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
63. Pereltsvaig, Asya
    2006 Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory24(2). 433–500. 10.1007/s11049‑005‑3820‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-3820-z [Google Scholar]
64. Serdobolskaya, Natalia
    2011 Grammaticalization patterns of the Adyghe instrumental case. In Vittorio S. Tomelleri , Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds.), Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus, 515–539. München, Berlin: Otto Sagner.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Smeets, Rieks
    1992 On valencies, actants and actant coding in Circassian. In B. G. Hewitt (ed.), Caucasian Perspectives, 98–144. München, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Stilo, Don
    2009 Case in Iranian: From reduction and loss to innovation and renewal. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 700–715. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sweet, Henry
    1985 An Icelandic Primer. With Grammar, Notes and Glossary. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ilja Seržant
    2018 Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking, 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Xalbad, T. X.
    1975 Vyraženie kategorij opredelennosti i neopredelennosti v abxazo-adygskix jazykax. (=The expression of the categories of definiteness and indefiniteness in the Abkhaz-Adyghe languages.). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
    [Google Scholar]