Volume 43, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Passivization has been characterized as a strictly morphological phenomenon. Some definitions of passivization even require the passive construction to exhibit special verbal morphology. Increasingly, however, there have been descriptions of languages that have “morphology-free” passive constructions. This paper presents data from Ulwa, a Papuan language of the Sepik region of Papua New Guinea, which forms its passive constructions through a syntactic operation. Specifically, passives are formed through the inversion of subject and predicate. Whereas the canonical transitive active sentence in Ulwa has the basic constituent order SOV, the corresponding passive sentence has the order VS, where the S of the passive corresponds to the O of the active. Agent arguments are optional; when they do appear in passive constructions, they are marked as obliques. The Ulwa data support claims that it is possible for passivization to be a syntactic phenomenon that operates on the level of the clause.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arka, I. Wayan & Jeladu Kosmas
    2005 Passive without passive morphology? Evidence from Manggarai. InI. Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies, 87–117. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barclay, Peter
    2008A grammar of Western Dani (LINCOM Grammar Handbooks 01). München: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow, Russell
    2018 A grammar of Ulwa. Mānoa: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
  4. 2019 A syntactic motivation for valency reduction: Antipassive constructions in Ulwa. Oceanic Linguistics58(1). 1–30. 10.1353/ol.2019.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2019.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bostoen, Koen & Léon Mundeke
    2011 Passiveness and inversion in Mbuun (Bantu B87, DRC). Studies in Language35(1). 72–111. 10.1075/sl.35.1.03bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.1.03bos [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobbinah, Alexander
    2008 Das morphologisch unmarkierte Passiv: Typologische Untersuchungen am Beispiel des Bambara. Köln: Universität zu Köln MA thesis.
  8. Cobbinah, Alexander & Friederike Lüpke
    2012 Not cut to fit: Zero coded passives in African languages. InMatthias Brenzinger & Anne-Maria Fehn (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th WOCAL World Congress of African Linguistics, Cologne, 17–21 August 2009, 153–165. Cologne: Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Creissels, Denis
    2007 A sketch of Bambara argument structure. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Grammar and Processing of Verbal Arguments, Leipzig, April 20–21, 2007. Available online atwww.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-Bam.arg.str.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2014 P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics52(4). 911–944. 10.1515/ling‑2014‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Demuth, Katherine
    1989 Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language65(1). 56–80. 10.2307/414842
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414842 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000 Introduction. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Donohue, Mark
    2005 The Palu’e passive: From pragmatic construction to grammatical device. InI. Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies, 59–85. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Durie, Mark
    1988 The so-called passive of Acehnese. Language64(1). 104–113. 10.2307/414788
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414788 [Google Scholar]
  16. Foley, William A.
    1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at theThird Lexical Functional Grammar Conference, Brisbane, 30 June–2 July, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2008 The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. InPeter K. Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 22–44. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Givón, Talmy
    1979On understanding grammar. Orlando: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1993English grammar: A function-based introduction, volumeII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2001Syntax: An introduction, volumeII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haspelmath, Martin
    1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language14. 25–70. 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has [Google Scholar]
  22. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2002 Voice in Western Austronesian: An update. InFay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, 7–15. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2005 The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. InWillem Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Keenan, Edward L.
    1985 Passive in the world’s languages. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 1, first edition, 243–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8. 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer
    2007 Passive in the world’s languages. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume1, second edition, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiparsky, Paul
    2013 Towards a null theory of the passive. Lingua125. 7–33. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Langacker, Ronald W. & Pamela Munro
    1975 Passives and their meaning. Language51(4). 789–830. 10.2307/412694
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412694 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lawler, John M.
    1977 A agrees with B in Acehnese: A problem for relational grammar. InPeter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical relations, syntax and semantics 7, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368866_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368866_010 [Google Scholar]
  30. 1988 On the question of the Acehnese ‘passive’. Language64(1). 114–117. 10.2307/414789
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414789 [Google Scholar]
  31. Laycock, Donald C.
    1973Sepik languages: Checklist and preliminary classification (Pacific Linguistics: Series B, 25). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lüpke, Friederike
    2007 Vanishing voice: The morphologically zero-coded passive of Jalonke. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft14. 173–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McElvenny, James
    2006 Notes on the Mudukumo language of the Yuat River, East Sepik Province, PNG. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
  34. Noonan, Michael
    1994 A tale of two passives in Irish. InBarbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 279–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.27.12noo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.12noo [Google Scholar]
  35. Pitteroff, Marcel
    2015 Unmarked passives: Evidence from German let-middles and let-passives. InThuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds.), NELS 45: Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, volumethree, 233–246. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Palmer, Bill
    2018 Language families of the New Guinea area. InBill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 1–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Riesberg, Sonja
    2014Symmetrical voice and linking in Western Austronesian languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518716
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518716 [Google Scholar]
  38. Shi, Dingxu
    1997 Issues on Chinese passive. Journal of Chinese Linguistics25(1). 41–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language61(4). 821–848. 10.2307/414491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 [Google Scholar]
  40. Siewierska, Anna
    1984The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2013 Passive constructions. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online atwals.info/chapter/107
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker
    2012 Passive agents: Prototypical vs. canonical passives. InDunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 151–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): passive; subject-verb inversion; verbal morphology; word order
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error