Volume 43, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In Athabascan languages, verbal morphological structure does not follow the cross-linguistically more common and stable ‘layered’ order: derivational and lexical affixes are not necessarily closer to the stem than inflectional affixes. While the emergence of the Athabascan order is understandable through different layers of grammaticalization (Mithun 2011), the question of why this order is relatively stable in the language family has not yet been satisfactorily answered. The distributional properties of cognate Athabascan morphemes reveal historical tendencies for fusion and reordering that suggest that affixes remain in or change their position depending on the semantic relevance to affixes, not necessarily to the alone, as Bybee’s (1985) morphological theory would predict. An additional factor for the stability of non-layered structure of morphemes is the high degree of semantic generality found in affixes between the stem and other lexical and derivational affixes.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Axelrod, Melissa
    1993The semantics of time: Aspectual categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark
    1985 The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry16. 373–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form, vol.3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. InBrian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9780470756393
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins
    1990 On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. InWilliam A. Croft, Suzanne Kemmer & Keith Denning (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.20.04byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.20.04byb [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William A.
    2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language49. 103–120. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  8. Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
    1984Functional syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Givón, Talmy
    2000 Internal reconstruction: As method, as theory. Typological Studies in Language43. 107–160. 10.1075/tsl.43.05giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.43.05giv [Google Scholar]
  10. Givón, Talmy & Loren Bommelyn
    2000 The evolution of de-transitive voice in Tolowa Athabaskan. Studies in language24(1). 41–76. 10.1075/sl.24.1.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.1.03giv [Google Scholar]
  11. Golla, Victor
    1970 Hupa grammar. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
  12. 1985A short practical grammar of Hupa. Hoopa, California: Hoopa Valley Tribe.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1966Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hale, Ken L.
    2001 Navajo verb stem position and the bipartite structure of the Navajo conjunct sector. Linguistic Inquiry32(4). 678–693. 10.1162/002438901753373041
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373041 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hargus, Sharon
    1985 The Lexical Phonology of Sekani. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
  16. 1988The lexical phonology of Sekani. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haspelmath, Martin
    1993 The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics31. 279–309. 10.1515/ling.1993.31.2.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1993.31.2.279 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language, 49. 83–102. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
  19. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Grammaticalization and lexicalization – opposite or orthogonal?InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Bernd Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, vol.158, 21–42. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoijer, Harry E.
    1956 The Chronology of the Athapaskan Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics22(4). 219–232. 10.1086/464374
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464374 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1960 Athapaskan Languages of the Pacific Coast. InStanley Diamond (ed.), Culture in History, 960–77. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1962 Linguistic subgroupings by glottochronology and the comparative method: The Athapaskan Languages. Lingua11. 192–198. 10.1016/0024‑3841(62)90026‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(62)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard, Philip
    1990A dictionary of the verbs of South Slavey. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories: Department of Culture and Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hymes, Dell H.
    1956 Na-Dene and positional analysis of categories. American Anthropologist58. 624–638. 10.1525/aa.1956.58.4.02a00040
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.4.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jung, Dagmar
    1995Distributive in Jicarilla Apache: Between aspect and number. Paper presented at theAthabaskan Language Conference, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kari, James
    1989 Affix positions and zones in the Athapaskan verb complex: Ahtna and Navajo. International Journal of American Linguistics55(4). 424–454. 10.1086/466129
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466129 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1990Ahtna Athabaskan Dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kibrik, Andrej A.
    1996 Transitivity decrease in Navajo and Athabaskan. InEloise Jelinek, Sally Midgette, Keren Rice & Leslie Saxon (eds.), Actor-affecting propositional derivations. Athabascan language studies. Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, 259–303. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Krauss, Michael E. & Victor Golla
    1981 Northern Athapaskan languages. InJune Helm (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Subartic6, 67–85. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Krauss, Michael E.
    1976 Na-Dene. InThomas Sebeok (ed.), Native Languages of the Americas, vol.1, 283–358. New York and London: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑1559‑0_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1559-0_8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Leer, Jeff
    2005 How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. InSharon Hargus & Keren Rice, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4269, 277–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonough, Joyce M.
    2003The Navajo sound system (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 55). Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0207‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0207-3 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mithun, Marianne
    2011 Grammaticalization and explanation. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 177–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Muysken, Pieter
    1986 Approaches to Affix Order. Linguistics24. 629–643. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.3.629
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.3.629 [Google Scholar]
  35. Olson, Maureen & Matilda Martinez
    2007Dictionary of Jicarilla Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Randoja, Tina K.
    1990The phonology and morphology of Halfway River Beaver. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rice, Keren
    2000Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663659
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663659 [Google Scholar]
  38. Spence, Justin
    2013 Language Change, Contact, and Koinéization in Pacific Coast Athabaskan. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley dissertation.
  39. Thomason, Sarah G.
    1980 Morphological instability, with and without language contact. InJacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 359–372, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110823127.359
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823127.359 [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, Chad
    1989 Voice and obviation in Athabaskan and other languages. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.
  41. 1993 The areal prefix hu- in Koyukon Athapaskan. International Journal of American linguistics59(3). 315–333. 10.1086/466201
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466201 [Google Scholar]
  42. Traugott, Elisabeth C.
    2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. InBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–47. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  43. Traugott, Elisabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and constructional changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic & Historical Linguistic 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tuttle, Siri G. & Sharon Hargus
    2004 Explaining variability in affix order: The Athabaskan areal and third person prefixes. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers4. 70–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Vajda, Edward J.
    2017 Patterns of innovation and retention in templatic polysynthesis. InMichael D. Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis, 363–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Willie, MaryAnn
    1991 Pronouns and obviation in Navajo. Tucson: University of Arizona dissertation.
  47. Young, Robert W.
    2000The Navajo verb system: an overview. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Young, Robert W. & William Morgan
    1980The Navajo Language. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1987The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Young, Robert W., William Morgan & Sally Midgette
    1992Analytical lexicon of Navajo. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error