Repeating responses as a conversational affordance for linguistic transmission

References

1. Angermeyer, Philipp S.
   2002 Lexical cohesion in multilingual conversation. The International Journal of Bilingualism6(4). 361–393. 10.1177/13670069020060040101
   https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069020060040101 [Google Scholar]
2. Anward, Jan
   2014 Dialogue and tradition: The open secret of language. InSusanne Günthner, Wolfgang Imo & Jörg Bücker (eds.), Grammar and dialogism, 53–75. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Auer, Peter & Frans Hinskens
   2005 The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. InPeter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 335–357. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486623.015
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486623.015 [Google Scholar]
4. Baaren, Rick B. van, Rob W. Holland, Bregje Steenaert & Ad van Knippenberg
   2003 Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39(4). 393–398. 10.1016/S0022‑1031(03)00014‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
5. Baaren, Rick B. van, Rob W. Holland, Kerry Kawakami & Ad van Knippenberg
   2004 Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science15(1). 71–74. 10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2004.01501012.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x [Google Scholar]
6. Bawa, Anshul, Monojit Choudhury & Kalika Bali
   2018 Accommodation of conversational code-choice. InGustavo Aguilar, Fahad AlGhamdi, Victor Soto, Thamar Solorio, Mona Diab & Julia Hirschberg (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Code-Switching, 82–91. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W18‑3210
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-3210 [Google Scholar]
7. Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Tom Schoenemann
   2009 Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language learning59(suppl. 1). 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bennett-Kastor, Tina L.
   1994 Repetition in language development: From interaction to cohesion. InBarbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, VolumeI, 155–171. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beňuš, Štefan, Agustín Gravano & Julia Hirschberg
   2011 Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking. Journal of Pragmatics43. 3001–3027. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.011 [Google Scholar]
10. Bock, Kathryn
    1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology18. 355–387. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
11. Bock, Kathryn & Zenzi M. Griffin
    2000 Journal of Experimental Psychology129(2). 177–192. 10.1037/0096‑3445.129.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 [Google Scholar]
12. Bock, Kathryn, Gary S. Dell, Franklin Chang & Kristine H. Onishi
    2007 Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition104(3). 437–458. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003 [Google Scholar]
13. Boghrati, Reihane, Joe Hoover, Kate M. Johnson, Justin Garten & Morteza Dehghani
    2016 Syntax accommodation in social media conversations. InA. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & J. C. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1463–1468. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bolden, Galina B.
    2009 Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs76(2). 121–143. 10.1080/03637750902828446
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828446 [Google Scholar]
15. Boyd, Robert & Peter J. Richerson
    1985 Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago/London: The University Press of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Jamie Pearson & Janet F. McLean
    2010 Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics42. 2355–2368. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.012 [Google Scholar]
17. Brennan, Susan E. & Herbert H. Clark
    1996 Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22(6). 1482–1493.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brody, Jill
    1986 Repetition as a rhetorical and conversational device in Tojolabal (Mayan). International Journal of American Linguistics52(3). 255–274. 10.1086/466022
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466022 [Google Scholar]
19. Brody, Jill
    1994 Multiple repetitions in Tojolab’al conversation. InBarbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, VolumeII, 3–14. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Brown, Penelope
    1998 Conversational structure and language acquisition: The role of repetition in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology8. 197–221. 10.1525/jlin.1998.8.2.197
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1998.8.2.197 [Google Scholar]
21. Butler, Laurie T. & Dianne C. Berry
    2004 Understanding the relationship between repetition priming and mere exposure. British Journal of Psychology95. 467–487. 10.1348/0007126042369776
    https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369776 [Google Scholar]
22. Bybee, Joan L.
    2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82(4). 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
23. Challis, Bradford H. & Robindra Sidhu
    1993 Dissociative effect of massed repetition on implicit and explicit measures of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition19(1). 115–127.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Brennan
    1991 Grounding in communication. InLauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Behrend (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006 [Google Scholar]
25. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1996 The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. InElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 366–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.011 [Google Scholar]
26. Coupland, Nikolas
    1984 Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language46. 49–70.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Du Bois, John
    2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
28. Egner, Inge
    1996 Other-repetition in question-form: Evidence from a West-African language. InCarla Bazzanella (ed.), Repetition in dialogue, 66–77. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Enfield, Nicholas J.
    2008 Transmission biases in linguistic epidemiology. Journal of Language Contact2(1). 299–310. 10.1163/000000008792525273
    https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525273 [Google Scholar]
30. Enfield, Nicholas J.
    2014 Natural causes of language: Frames, biases, and cultural transmission. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_533873
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_533873 [Google Scholar]
31. Enfield, Nicholas J. & Jack Sidnell
    2014 Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. InDaniel Dor, Chris Knight & Jerome Lewis (eds.), The social origins of language, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
32. Farrell, Meagan T., Lise Abrams & Katherine K. White
    2012 The role of priming in lexical access and speech production. InNobuaki Hsu & Zacharias Schütt (eds.), Psychology of Priming, 205–244. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fernández, Eva M., Ricardo Augusto de Souza & Agustina Carando
    2017 Bilingual innovations: Experimental evidence offers clues regarding the psycholinguistics of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition20(2). 251–268. 10.1017/S1366728916000924
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000924 [Google Scholar]
34. Ferreira, Victor S. & Kathryn Bock
    2006 The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes21(7–8). 1011–1029. 10.1080/01690960600824609
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609 [Google Scholar]
35. Fricke, Melinda & Gerrit Jan Kootstra
    2016 Primed codeswitching in spontaneous bilingual dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language91. 181–201. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.003 [Google Scholar]
36. Garrod, Simon & Martin J. Pickering
    2013 Dialogue: Interactive alignment and its implications for language learning and language change. InP.-M. Binder & K. Smith (eds.), The language phenomenon: Human communication from milliseconds to millennia, 47–64. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑36086‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36086-2_3 [Google Scholar]
37. Gibson, James J.
    1979 The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gijn, Rik van
    2004 Number in the Yurakaré noun phrase. Linguistics in the Netherlands21. 69–79. 10.1075/avt.21.10gij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.21.10gij [Google Scholar]
39. Gijn, Rik van
    2006 A Grammar of Yurakaré. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen PhD dissertation.
40. Gijn, Rik van, Vincent Hirtzel & Sonja Gipper
    2011 The Yurakaré Archive. Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. https://archive.mpi.nl/ (Last access7 March 2020).
41. Giles, Howard
    1973 Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics15(2). 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Giles, Howard
    2008 Communication Accommodation Theory. InLeslie A. Baxter & Dawn O. Braithwaite (eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives, 161–173. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781483329529.n12
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529.n12 [Google Scholar]
43. Giles, Howard & Peter F. Powesland
    1975 Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland & Justine Coupland
    1991 Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. InHoward Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 1–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001 [Google Scholar]
45. Gipper, Sonja
    2011 Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen PhD dissertation.
46. Gries, Stefan Th
    2005 Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research34(4). 365–399. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑6139‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3 [Google Scholar]
47. Gries, Stefan Th. & Gerrit Jan Kootstra
    2017 Structural priming within and across languages: A corpus-based perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition20(2). 235–250. 10.1017/S1366728916001085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001085 [Google Scholar]
48. Hartsuiker, Robert J., Sarah Bernolet, Sofie Schoonbaert, Sara Speybroeck & Dieter Vanderelst
    2008 Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language58. 214–238. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
49. Hayashi, Makoto
    2010 An overview of the question-response system in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics42(10). 2685–2702. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.006 [Google Scholar]
50. Heath, Jeffrey
    1989 From code-switching to borrowing: A case study of Moroccan Arabic. London: Kegan Paul International.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hirtzel, Vincent
    2010 Le maîtra à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales PhD dissertation.
52. Hoey, Michael
    1991 Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hoey, Michael
    2005 Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Hu, Jiang
    2011 Effects of priming and work relationship on linguistic alignment in computer-mediated communication and human-computer interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
55. Ishikawa, Minako
    1991 Iconicity in discourse: The case of repetition. Text11(4). 553–580. 10.1515/text.1.1991.11.4.553
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.4.553 [Google Scholar]
56. Jäger, Gerhard & Anette Rosenbach
    2008 Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics34. 85–113. 10.1515/THLI.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
57. Jefferson, Gail
    1972 Side sequences. InDavid Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294–338. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Karatsu, Mariko
    2012 Conversational storytelling among Japanese women. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.16 [Google Scholar]
59. Kaschak, Michael P.
    2007 Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition35(5). 925–937. 10.3758/BF03193466
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193466 [Google Scholar]
60. Kiesling, Scott
    2011 Linguistic variation and change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kim, Haeyeon
    2002 The form and function of next-turn repetition in English conversations. Language Research38(1). 51–81.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Kirby, Simon, Tom Griffiths & Kenny Smith
    2014 Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology28. 108–114. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.014 [Google Scholar]
63. Kootstra, Gerrit J. & Pieter Muysken
    2017 Cross-linguistic priming in bilinguals: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language, processing, acquisition, and change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition20(2). 215–218. 10.1017/S1366728916001127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001127 [Google Scholar]
64. Kootstra, Gerrit J. & Hülya Șahin
    2018 Crosslinguistic structural priming as a mechanism of contact-induced language change: Evidence from Papiamento-Dutch bilinguals in Aruba and the Netherlands. Language94(4). 902–930. 10.1353/lan.2018.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0050 [Google Scholar]
65. Levelt, Willem J. M. & Stephanie Kelter
    1982 Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology2. 78–106. 10.1016/0010‑0285(82)90005‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90005-6 [Google Scholar]
66. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Loebell, Helga & Kathryn Bock
    2003 Structural priming across languages. Linguistics41(5). 791–824. 10.1515/ling.2003.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026 [Google Scholar]
68. Luka, Barbara J. & Heidi Choi
    2012 Dynamic grammar in adults: Incidental learning of natural syntactic structures extends over 48 h. Journal of Memory and Language66. 345–360. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
69. Maddux, William W., Elizabeth Mullen & Adam D. Galinsky
    2008 Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(2). 461–468. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
70. Mayer, Mercer
    1969 Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]
71. McCarthy, Michael
    1987 Some vocabulary patterns in conversation. InRonald Carter & Michael McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching, 181–200. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Muysken, Pieter
    2000 Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Nilsson, Jenny
    2015 Dialect accommodation in interaction: Explaining dialect change and stability. Language & Communication41. 6–16. 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.008 [Google Scholar]
74. Norrick, Neal R.
    1987 Functions of repetition in conversation. Text7(3). 245–264. 10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245 [Google Scholar]
75. Norrick, Neal R.
    1996 Repetition in conversational joking. InCarla Bazzanella (ed.), Repetition in dialogue, 129–139. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2006 On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119(4). 2382–2393. 10.1121/1.2178720
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 [Google Scholar]
77. Pardo, Jennifer S., Rachel Gibbons, Alexandra Suppes & Robert M. Krauss
    2012 Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics40(1). 190–197. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
78. Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod
    2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27. 169–226. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
79. Plaza Martínez, Pedro
    (coord.) 2011 Historia, lengua, cultura y educación de la Nación Yurakaré. Cochabamba: FUNPROEIB Andes/CEPY.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes, in: J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Stuctures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Pomerantz, Anita & John Heritage
    2013 Preference. InJack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 210–228. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Poplack, Shana & David Sankoff
    1984 Borrowing: The synchrony of integration. Linguistics22. 99–135. 10.1515/ling.1984.22.1.99
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1984.22.1.99 [Google Scholar]
83. Rogers, Everett M.
    1995 Diffusion of innovations (fourth edition). New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2015 How usage rescues the system: Persistence as conservation. InAria Adli, Marco García García & Göz Kaufmann (eds.), Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches, 289–315. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346855‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346855-012 [Google Scholar]
85. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology102(1). 161–216. 10.1086/230911
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230911 [Google Scholar]
86. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
87. Schwitalla, Johannes
    2002 Kohäsion statt Kohärenz: Bedeutungsverschiebungen nach dem Sprecherwechsel – vornehmlich in Streitgesprächen. InArnulf Deppermann & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds.), Be-deuten: Wie Bedeutung im Gespräch entsteht, 106–118. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Seamon, John G., Pepper C. Williams, Michael J. Crowley, Irene J. Kim, Samantha A. Langer, Peter J. Orne & Dana L. Wishengard
    1995 The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21(3). 711–721.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Smith, Kenny, Siman Kirby & Henry Brighton
    2003 Iterated learning: A framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life9(4). 371–386. 10.1162/106454603322694825
    https://doi.org/10.1162/106454603322694825 [Google Scholar]
90. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
    1996 On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations. InElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 277–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.006 [Google Scholar]
91. Sperber, Dan
    1985 Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man20(1). 73–89. 10.2307/2802222
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2802222 [Google Scholar]
92. Stivers, Tanya
    2005 Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction38. 131–158. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1 [Google Scholar]
93. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2006 Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197808
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197808 [Google Scholar]
94. Tannen, Deborah
    1987 Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language63(3). 574–605. 10.2307/415006
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415006 [Google Scholar]
95. Tantucci, Vittorio, Jonathan Culpeper & Matteo Di Cristofaro
    2018 Dynamic resonance and social reciprocity in language change: The case of Good morrow. Language Sciences68. 6–21. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.09.004 [Google Scholar]
96. Thomason, Sarah G.
    2001 Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine E. Travis
    2010 Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism15(3). 241–267. 10.1177/1367006910371025
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910371025 [Google Scholar]
98. Trudgill, Peter
    1986 Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Trudgill, Peter
    2010 Investigations in sociohistorical linguistics: Stories of colonisation and contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511760501
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760501 [Google Scholar]
100. Tuten, Donald N.
     2003 Koineization in Medieval Spanish. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110901269
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110901269 [Google Scholar]
101. Urban, Greg
     1994 Repetition and cultural replication: Three examples from Shokleng. InBarbara Johnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Volume2, 145–161. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Watson-Gegeo, Karen Ann & David W. Gegeo
     1986 Calling-out and repeating routines in Kwara’ae children’s language socialization. InBambi B. Schieffelin & Elinor Ochs (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 17–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes
     2006 ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)5. 1556–1559.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Xu, Jun
     2016 Displaying recipiency: Reactive tokens in Mandarin task-oriented interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.6 [Google Scholar]
105. Xu, Yang, Jeremy Cole & David Reitter
     2018 Not that much power: Linguistic alignment is influenced more by low-level linguistic features rather than social power. InIryna Gurevych & Yusuke Miyao (eds.), Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1: Long Papers), 601–610. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/P18‑1056
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1056 [Google Scholar]